Anonymous wrote:
Happy with him? I don't know that to be the case. Would you run for office today? I wouldn't.

You need a lot of money to run. More than that, it's a poisonous environment. Who the hell in their right mind runs for office?

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Then why are you so incensed?

Republicans aren’t incensed — we are thrilled! More crazy Dems to alienate normal, hardworking American voters! The Democrats are rapidly becoming the Party of Moonbats.

Republicans have an actual Nazi running for Congress.

Tell the whole story, Jeff. The person running has identified as a Nazi and cannot be stopped by the GOP from running under that state's laws.

The only thing they can do is put forth a write-in campaign to stop the shenanigans. For all we know, it's a democrat running in Nazi drag for the headlines.

There is the actual Nazi in Illinois. The Republicans could have run a candidate against him in the primary if they didn't think he was an appropriate representative of their party. Since he was unopposed, I guess the Republicans were happy with him. In California, there is an anti-Semite Holocaust denier who ran in the open primary, beating a Democrat and an Independent (while another Democrat got the most votes). Again, Republicans could have run another Republican or backed the Independent. That's the whole story.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Then why are you so incensed?

Republicans aren’t incensed — we are thrilled! More crazy Dems to alienate normal, hardworking American voters! The Democrats are rapidly becoming the Party of Moonbats.

Republicans have an actual Nazi running for Congress.

Tell the whole story, Jeff. The person running has identified as a Nazi and cannot be stopped by the GOP from running under that state's laws.

The only thing they can do is put forth a write-in campaign to stop the shenanigans. For all we know, it's a democrat running in Nazi drag for the headlines.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Then why are you so incensed?

Republicans aren’t incensed — we are thrilled! More crazy Dems to alienate normal, hardworking American voters! The Democrats are rapidly becoming the Party of Moonbats.

Republicans have an actual Nazi running for Congress.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Then why are you so incensed?

Republicans aren’t incensed — we are thrilled! More crazy Dems to alienate normal, hardworking American voters! The Democrats are rapidly becoming the Party of Moonbats.

Republicans have an actual Nazi running for Congress.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Socialism is such a scary word. Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? Or is your issue one of vocabulary?

Yes, her positions are incompatible with private property rights. Just implementing taxes so you can have your dream utopia (free healthcare, a government job for everyone, free education, housing as a human right, etc., etc.,etc.) through "the collective" is not what the founders envisioned.

Why should anyone bother working? So they can pay 80% of their pay check to her to spend as she sees fit? It's childish nonsense. You realize there are economic realities and money doesn't grow on trees, right?



I'm surprised you even had to ask the question.

jsteele wrote:Socialism is such a scary word. Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? Or is your issue one of vocabulary?

jsteele wrote:Socialism is such a scary word. Can you point out her specific policies with which you disagree? Or is your issue one of vocabulary?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Then why are you so incensed?

Republicans aren’t incensed — we are thrilled! More crazy Dems to alienate normal, hardworking American voters! The Democrats are rapidly becoming the Party of Moonbats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Then why are you so incensed?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Then why are you so incensed?

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.

Anonymous wrote:The only reason they have “free” university in Europe is because they restrict who goes especially in Germany . The left here is so focused on equality of outcome they’d be outraged at college spots going mostly to whites and Asians

Anonymous wrote:If she represents the future of the Democratic Party, then we can be sure the Dems will have difficulty winning elections in the coming years.