Anonymous
06/05/2018 09:03
Subject: Re:Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Conservatives want to blame everyone else for how they voted, because he is an embarrassment. Own your choices, Republicans. You chose him and you can fix this mess.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:53
Subject: Re:Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Wikileaks is a Russia propaganda arm website and information cache. I will not click on it.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:50
Subject: Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming the media.
People were tired of your reverse racism, plain and simple.
You ran Hillary, a piss-poor candidate health wise and who worked overtime to alienate half the country. Yes, the "white privilege" as you categorized them said enough of this BS.
Mook told her she could triangulate on different segments and pull all the minorities together whilst demonizing the "irreedeemable deplorables". It didn't work.
The media WAS OVERWHELMINGLY IN THE TANK for Hillary.
I can see why you believe that. the Kremlin worked very hard to make you feel it is true. Example A: Hillary had a chest infection and they convinced you she's "piss-poor candidate health wise". Example B: More than half the country voted for Hillary. Example C: Most of the posters on this board are "white privilege", even the liberals.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:37
Subject: Re:Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:33
Subject: Re:Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More proof: all the "push polling" by the media... "Hillary has a 97% chance of winning, so just stay home, Republicans".
Didn't work.
Push polling is done by the pollsters, not by the media.
And the media runs the polls constantly as their lead stories. And those who work for the polling firms jump back and forth between media outlets and polling. Stop being obtuse.
You've seen it many times: "A new NYTIMES/GEEKSURVEY poll finds ......"
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:30
Subject: Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Couldn't run Hillary's speeches. No one showed up. LOLZ
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:29
Subject: Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
You're acting like that's the single case.
Hillary was swirling in the media all day everyday. WTF do you think her and her crew was doing when they disappeared for days at a time?
Planting news with the help of the NY Times, Wapo and every journalist under the sun.
Cut the crap.
Hillary was swirling in the media all day everyday. WTF do you think her and her crew was doing when they disappeared for days at a time?
Planting news with the help of the NY Times, Wapo and every journalist under the sun.
Cut the crap.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:26
Subject: Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming the media.
People were tired of your reverse racism, plain and simple.
You ran Hillary, a piss-poor candidate health wise and who worked overtime to alienate half the country. Yes, the "white privilege" as you categorized them said enough of this BS.
Mook told her she could triangulate on different segments and pull all the minorities together whilst demonizing the "irreedeemable deplorables". It didn't work.
The media WAS OVERWHELMINGLY IN THE TANK for Hillary.
Which is why the media showed EVERY SINGLE TRUMP SPEECH live, real time, mutliple times a day, and almost never ran anyone else's speeches at all. It was calculated that Trump captured hundreds of millions in free media exposure, particularly from CNN. When the full Zucker story comes out, it won't be pretty for him or the network.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:24
Subject: Re:Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous wrote:More proof: all the "push polling" by the media... "Hillary has a 97% chance of winning, so just stay home, Republicans".
Didn't work.
Push polling is done by the pollsters, not by the media.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:23
Subject: Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous wrote:There has been speculation that it was after the White House Correspondent's dinner that Trump may have finally decided to run for president. During that dinner, Obama mocked Trump mercilessly even as Trump sat there and had to listen to it.
We know that Trump is thin-skinned and what Obama did to him must have been humiliating. But if the speculation has any basis - and, yes, Trump has flirted with running for decades - it would be the ultimate irony that a bunch of jokes about Trump by Obama was the catalyst for Trump seeking the presidency and ultimately winning the election .......... and in the process undoing much of what Obama thought would be his legacy.
If being a black president triggering all the racists and morons is a mantle for responsibility, then sure.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:18
Subject: Re:Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous wrote:More proof: all the "push polling" by the media... "Hillary has a 97% chance of winning, so just stay home, Republicans".
Didn't work.
Actually, that could have backfired the ither way. Since. Hillary has a 97% chance of winning! why should I bother standing in line for two hours to vote for a sure thing?
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:11
Subject: Re:Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
More proof: all the "push polling" by the media... "Hillary has a 97% chance of winning, so just stay home, Republicans".
Didn't work.
Didn't work.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 08:07
Subject: Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Stop blaming the media.
People were tired of your reverse racism, plain and simple.
You ran Hillary, a piss-poor candidate health wise and who worked overtime to alienate half the country. Yes, the "white privilege" as you categorized them said enough of this BS.
Mook told her she could triangulate on different segments and pull all the minorities together whilst demonizing the "irreedeemable deplorables". It didn't work.
The media WAS OVERWHELMINGLY IN THE TANK for Hillary.
People were tired of your reverse racism, plain and simple.
You ran Hillary, a piss-poor candidate health wise and who worked overtime to alienate half the country. Yes, the "white privilege" as you categorized them said enough of this BS.
Mook told her she could triangulate on different segments and pull all the minorities together whilst demonizing the "irreedeemable deplorables". It didn't work.
The media WAS OVERWHELMINGLY IN THE TANK for Hillary.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 07:55
Subject: Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it ah-mazing that if you look at the county map of each presidential election, you see all the countries that were blue and elected Obama twice turned red to elect Trump?
Why, those Americans that elected our first black president turned racist and elected a Nazi. My gosh.
How fickle.
Because it got way out of hand. There was a backlash and the "deplorables" unchecked their white privilege and said enough of this BS.
That's what happens when you gin up identity politics like democrats have for the past 20 years. People eventually say ENOUGH!
Yes, exactly. People got fed up with the racist anti-white BS, which had gone too far - and still is. It's worse now, in fact, since the election. Just a few months ago we even had some liberal U of IL professor insist we shouldn't teach Pythagorean Theory because it makes it appear that white Europeans (Greeks specifically in this case) were advanced in their thinking - and is therefore racist. And "black only" day on campus, where students beat up a whitey professor because he didn't vacate the premises. And a class on "the problem of whiteness." Enough is enough!
(I was in Greece at an ancient amphitheater where a whisper carried through loud and clear to the upper "seats." The Greeks using mathematics to figure that out. Shoukd the tour guide not have told us that because it makes it seem as if Europeans are smart?)
The real reason Trump got elected is right above^^ Right wing media loves to perpetuate lies.
The professor you are talking about never insisted we shouldn't teach "Pythagorean Theory" by which you mean the Pythagorean Theorem. That is a lie. She is a mathematician, and her point is that the name is Greek even though four separate cultures discovered it previous to him. The Chinese, Indians, Mesopotamians, and Babylonians all knew about it. But we say Pythagoras discovered it, and then racists say "why are all the major discoveries by Europeans?"
She does not oppose teaching the theorem. She just wants to show how we are reinforcing the idea that Europeans made everything.
Anonymous
06/05/2018 07:23
Subject: Was Obama indirectly responsible for Trump becoming president?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it ah-mazing that if you look at the county map of each presidential election, you see all the countries that were blue and elected Obama twice turned red to elect Trump?
Why, those Americans that elected our first black president turned racist and elected a Nazi. My gosh.
How fickle.
Because it got way out of hand. There was a backlash and the "deplorables" unchecked their white privilege and said enough of this BS.
That's what happens when you gin up identity politics like democrats have for the past 20 years. People eventually say ENOUGH!
Yes, exactly. People got fed up with the racist anti-white BS, which had gone too far - and still is. It's worse now, in fact, since the election. Just a few months ago we even had some liberal U of IL professor insist we shouldn't teach Pythagorean Theory because it makes it appear that white Europeans (Greeks specifically in this case) were advanced in their thinking - and is therefore racist. And "black only" day on campus, where students beat up a whitey professor because he didn't vacate the premises. And a class on "the problem of whiteness." Enough is enough!
(I was in Greece at an ancient amphitheater where a whisper carried through loud and clear to the upper "seats." The Greeks using mathematics to figure that out. Shoukd the tour guide not have told us that because it makes it seem as if Europeans are smart?)