Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like not eating peanut butter in public should become thought of as a social norm instead of an accommodation. If this is lethal why take the risk. That’s insane. I feel like it should come with an FDA warning label.
BUT... where does this start and stop? For other children peanuts are fine but some or all of the following are life and death:
eggs (including baked into muffins and cookies)
dairy (yes, this means milk but also yogurt, cheese, cream cheese, ice cream...)
meat (yup - this is real)
soy
legumes like peas, beans, etc - and like peanuts, since they are a legume not a nut
seeds (like sesame seeds or pine nuts - again, a seed not a nut)
tree nuts - including almonds, hazelnuts, macadamia, cashews, pecans, pistachios, brazil.... and whatever nuts I'm forgetting right now
but some people (like me) are allergic only to almonds, not to ALL tree nuts - so it gets more confusing
I direct a preschool program - and we won't allow peanuts or tree nuts or both when a child who attends is allergic to one or more of these. BUT.... we currently have a child who is allergic to eggs and peanuts - but we only say no to peanuts - not eggs. Is that right? It's a double standard, isn't it? But children with allergies have limited food choices because of their allergies (and depending on the # of allergies this can be a problem) BUT we shouldn't require all children attending a preschool to stay away from the same foods for no reason and create limits to their food too, right?
I mean, at one point we had a child who was allergic to SEVEN items on the list above - which obviously seriously limited her food options - is that what all 75 other children at our school should do? Obviously not.