Anonymous wrote:You don’t need to add a big dramatic family fight to your life right now. MIL was protecting you. Maybe she overstepped, or communications were confused, or whatever, but just let it go, OP. There will be other things to worry about. You are in hormone swing city, entering the sleep-deprivation phase, and you and husband are going to get snippy and grumpy. Keep it sweet with each other and family. Apologize to friend. Enjoy your baby! How lovely that this is the biggest problem.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she was trying to shelter you. .
NO. No, MIL cared about who saw the baby first. See the following from the OP:
"My MIL stopped her before she got to the room and told her to leave now. She then proceeded to send her a Facebook message telling her “Our family will be visiting with the baby first. Please stay away from the hospital.” "
That's not a caring MIL, that's a greedy grandma.
I would agree with you if she had been manipulating OP's mom too. But she didn't. She was just keeping the initial meeting family. That is, for better or worse, normal and expected.
Not necessarily--and, regardless, if her initial instinct wasn't to check in with OP's DH at the very least, she's way out of line.
Some people have really close friends. Most people would think friends are tier 2. Without an ability to check with OP's DH (who was in the delivery room) MIL worked with social norms to make a decision. You can tell her BFF is actually a really close friend that you would welcome at future births without making it seem like she's satan for doing something 90% of people would think is normal.
Uh no, not normal at all. It's not normal to comandeer someone's birth and who can visit them in the hospital. In the absence of other information, MIL should have asked OP or her DH.
So MIL should have knocked on the hospital room door when OP's friend showed up when OP was having a hard part of her labor and DH was in there supporting her to ask her a question about some person who isn't family who just showed up? Honestly I wouldn't have sent the facebook message but I would have sent the friend away in that scenario. MIL had a choice between erring on the side of family or busting into a difficult labor to ask a question about visitors. 9 times out of 10 the mother would prefer to not be bothered.
NP but what?! Of course she should have knocked on the door and asked. It wasn't like OP was crowning right then.
OP was saying she was having a hard time. And apparently MIL was not in the room at the time so she had likely been kicked out. If MIL is kicked out she would understandably assume a friend was also not welcome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she was trying to shelter you. .
NO. No, MIL cared about who saw the baby first. See the following from the OP:
"My MIL stopped her before she got to the room and told her to leave now. She then proceeded to send her a Facebook message telling her “Our family will be visiting with the baby first. Please stay away from the hospital.” "
That's not a caring MIL, that's a greedy grandma.
I would agree with you if she had been manipulating OP's mom too. But she didn't. She was just keeping the initial meeting family. That is, for better or worse, normal and expected.
Not necessarily--and, regardless, if her initial instinct wasn't to check in with OP's DH at the very least, she's way out of line.
Some people have really close friends. Most people would think friends are tier 2. Without an ability to check with OP's DH (who was in the delivery room) MIL worked with social norms to make a decision. You can tell her BFF is actually a really close friend that you would welcome at future births without making it seem like she's satan for doing something 90% of people would think is normal.
Uh no, not normal at all. It's not normal to comandeer someone's birth and who can visit them in the hospital. In the absence of other information, MIL should have asked OP or her DH.
So MIL should have knocked on the hospital room door when OP's friend showed up when OP was having a hard part of her labor and DH was in there supporting her to ask her a question about some person who isn't family who just showed up? Honestly I wouldn't have sent the facebook message but I would have sent the friend away in that scenario. MIL had a choice between erring on the side of family or busting into a difficult labor to ask a question about visitors. 9 times out of 10 the mother would prefer to not be bothered.
NP but what?! Of course she should have knocked on the door and asked. It wasn't like OP was crowning right then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she was trying to shelter you. .
NO. No, MIL cared about who saw the baby first. See the following from the OP:
"My MIL stopped her before she got to the room and told her to leave now. She then proceeded to send her a Facebook message telling her “Our family will be visiting with the baby first. Please stay away from the hospital.” "
That's not a caring MIL, that's a greedy grandma.
I would agree with you if she had been manipulating OP's mom too. But she didn't. She was just keeping the initial meeting family. That is, for better or worse, normal and expected.
Not necessarily--and, regardless, if her initial instinct wasn't to check in with OP's DH at the very least, she's way out of line.
Some people have really close friends. Most people would think friends are tier 2. Without an ability to check with OP's DH (who was in the delivery room) MIL worked with social norms to make a decision. You can tell her BFF is actually a really close friend that you would welcome at future births without making it seem like she's satan for doing something 90% of people would think is normal.
Uh no, not normal at all. It's not normal to comandeer someone's birth and who can visit them in the hospital. In the absence of other information, MIL should have asked OP or her DH.
So MIL should have knocked on the hospital room door when OP's friend showed up when OP was having a hard part of her labor and DH was in there supporting her to ask her a question about some person who isn't family who just showed up? Honestly I wouldn't have sent the facebook message but I would have sent the friend away in that scenario. MIL had a choice between erring on the side of family or busting into a difficult labor to ask a question about visitors. 9 times out of 10 the mother would prefer to not be bothered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she was trying to shelter you. .
NO. No, MIL cared about who saw the baby first. See the following from the OP:
"My MIL stopped her before she got to the room and told her to leave now. She then proceeded to send her a Facebook message telling her “Our family will be visiting with the baby first. Please stay away from the hospital.” "
That's not a caring MIL, that's a greedy grandma.
I would agree with you if she had been manipulating OP's mom too. But she didn't. She was just keeping the initial meeting family. That is, for better or worse, normal and expected.
Not necessarily--and, regardless, if her initial instinct wasn't to check in with OP's DH at the very least, she's way out of line.
Some people have really close friends. Most people would think friends are tier 2. Without an ability to check with OP's DH (who was in the delivery room) MIL worked with social norms to make a decision. You can tell her BFF is actually a really close friend that you would welcome at future births without making it seem like she's satan for doing something 90% of people would think is normal.
Uh no, not normal at all. It's not normal to comandeer someone's birth and who can visit them in the hospital. In the absence of other information, MIL should have asked OP or her DH.
So MIL should have knocked on the hospital room door when OP's friend showed up when OP was having a hard part of her labor and DH was in there supporting her to ask her a question about some person who isn't family who just showed up? Honestly I wouldn't have sent the facebook message but I would have sent the friend away in that scenario. MIL had a choice between erring on the side of family or busting into a difficult labor to ask a question about visitors. 9 times out of 10 the mother would prefer to not be bothered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she was trying to shelter you. .
NO. No, MIL cared about who saw the baby first. See the following from the OP:
"My MIL stopped her before she got to the room and told her to leave now. She then proceeded to send her a Facebook message telling her “Our family will be visiting with the baby first. Please stay away from the hospital.” "
That's not a caring MIL, that's a greedy grandma.
I would agree with you if she had been manipulating OP's mom too. But she didn't. She was just keeping the initial meeting family. That is, for better or worse, normal and expected.
Not necessarily--and, regardless, if her initial instinct wasn't to check in with OP's DH at the very least, she's way out of line.
Some people have really close friends. Most people would think friends are tier 2. Without an ability to check with OP's DH (who was in the delivery room) MIL worked with social norms to make a decision. You can tell her BFF is actually a really close friend that you would welcome at future births without making it seem like she's satan for doing something 90% of people would think is normal.
Uh no, not normal at all. It's not normal to comandeer someone's birth and who can visit them in the hospital. In the absence of other information, MIL should have asked OP or her DH.
So MIL should have knocked on the hospital room door when OP's friend showed up when OP was having a hard part of her labor and DH was in there supporting her to ask her a question about some person who isn't family who just showed up? Honestly I wouldn't have sent the facebook message but I would have sent the friend away in that scenario. MIL had a choice between erring on the side of family or busting into a difficult labor to ask a question about visitors. 9 times out of 10 the mother would prefer to not be bothered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she was trying to shelter you. .
NO. No, MIL cared about who saw the baby first. See the following from the OP:
"My MIL stopped her before she got to the room and told her to leave now. She then proceeded to send her a Facebook message telling her “Our family will be visiting with the baby first. Please stay away from the hospital.” "
That's not a caring MIL, that's a greedy grandma.
I would agree with you if she had been manipulating OP's mom too. But she didn't. She was just keeping the initial meeting family. That is, for better or worse, normal and expected.
Not necessarily--and, regardless, if her initial instinct wasn't to check in with OP's DH at the very least, she's way out of line.
Some people have really close friends. Most people would think friends are tier 2. Without an ability to check with OP's DH (who was in the delivery room) MIL worked with social norms to make a decision. You can tell her BFF is actually a really close friend that you would welcome at future births without making it seem like she's satan for doing something 90% of people would think is normal.
Uh no, not normal at all. It's not normal to comandeer someone's birth and who can visit them in the hospital. In the absence of other information, MIL should have asked OP or her DH.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she was trying to shelter you. .
NO. No, MIL cared about who saw the baby first. See the following from the OP:
"My MIL stopped her before she got to the room and told her to leave now. She then proceeded to send her a Facebook message telling her “Our family will be visiting with the baby first. Please stay away from the hospital.” "
That's not a caring MIL, that's a greedy grandma.
I would agree with you if she had been manipulating OP's mom too. But she didn't. She was just keeping the initial meeting family. That is, for better or worse, normal and expected.
Not necessarily--and, regardless, if her initial instinct wasn't to check in with OP's DH at the very least, she's way out of line.
Some people have really close friends. Most people would think friends are tier 2. Without an ability to check with OP's DH (who was in the delivery room) MIL worked with social norms to make a decision. You can tell her BFF is actually a really close friend that you would welcome at future births without making it seem like she's satan for doing something 90% of people would think is normal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she was trying to shelter you. .
NO. No, MIL cared about who saw the baby first. See the following from the OP:
"My MIL stopped her before she got to the room and told her to leave now. She then proceeded to send her a Facebook message telling her “Our family will be visiting with the baby first. Please stay away from the hospital.” "
That's not a caring MIL, that's a greedy grandma.
I would agree with you if she had been manipulating OP's mom too. But she didn't. She was just keeping the initial meeting family. That is, for better or worse, normal and expected.
Not necessarily--and, regardless, if her initial instinct wasn't to check in with OP's DH at the very least, she's way out of line.