Anonymous wrote:Your sister and possibly your parents, if they're her support system, need to get to adoption-related counseling stat.
Signed, an adoptee who's found her birth family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If people don't want to be contacted by long lost relatives, why on earth do they put their DNA profiles up on the internet? People who get DNA tests have the option to make it public or not. Why make it public and then get mad about it?
Well, a lot of the times it's the "secret" relatives coming out of the woodwork that blows things up and causes the drama.
My adopted cousin went through something similar. She found relatives using one of the ancestry DNA sites and contacted them. Her adoption was closed as well. Turns out that it was closed because her bio mom had her in college and kept it a big secret from her family. My cousin contacting family members blew up bio mom's secret. She then had to tell HER still alive parents that she'd had a baby in college that she placed up for adoption as well as tell her siblings and her current husband/kids.
IMO, if your adoption was closed, it was closed for a reason and you shouldn't go looking for answers/bio parents. I only say that after seeing all the drama my cousin's exploration caused and all of the heartbreak she went through. Lots of "if I didn't want you in my life then, what makes you think I'd want you now?" type emails exchanged back and forth. She still stalks her bio mom's kid's Instagram pages and it has an overall negative effect on her, IMO. She watches them have this life with their mom that she imagined she'd get in her head. It's not like she had a bad life with my aunt & uncle either, it's just she built up a fantasy that didn't play out and instead of just cutting all ties, she stalks the kids and makes it worse for herself. Before watching her go through this, I was very much in favor of adoptees contacting and finding their bio parents.
Anonymous wrote:The birth mothers family and kids may not have known about the adoption so when they opted to be contacted it was likely they assumed distant cousins or something, not a sister.
This just brings up so many more issues with adoption and limited access to abortion.
Anonymous wrote:Let's see here.
Closed adoption.
Birth mother adamant she not be contacted.
I don't see any reason for misunderstanding here.
Your sister needs to leave them all alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The whole idea behind a closed and sealed adoption is just part of the whole 'evil' regime of shaming women and protecting men. Sorry, but the parties won't have privacy. However, the mother and siblings owe her nothing except the information at hand. She should not expect a "family."
Totally agree.
Anonymous wrote:If people don't want to be contacted by long lost relatives, why on earth do they put their DNA profiles up on the internet? People who get DNA tests have the option to make it public or not. Why make it public and then get mad about it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with your sister. Her bio family could have chosen not to do ancestry.com or checked the box that they not be contacted. They put themselves out there. Anyone who does that sort of test should understand by now that birth or other secrets could be revealed.
From my sister's case, her found siblings had no idea their mother had had another child. It was a family secret. They might have just thought they'd find cousins not the secret love child of their mom.
NP here but, tough. Such is life. They are adults, and this child's birth was presumably decades ago. It is not that child's fault they were born-- life happens.
Life is very tough, thanks for being kind about it. My sister is the product of a rape/incest (rape by family member). The family is of course very Catholic so it has caused quite a stir with her bio family. Imagine finding out that your mom had a child, that she was raped, and it was by her own stepfather who you grew up with and called him Pappi.
Yeah it isn't her fault she is alive, but she is a reminder of something awful to them all. No one wants to talk to her.
And the child should pay the price for all of that decades later because people don't want to cope with it? Nope. Sorry. They don't have to invite her to Christmas dinner, but they can certainly be respectful and kind towards the child and answer questions.