Anonymous wrote:I don't really get why we have still so many option schools in Arlington.
When I was growing up as a student in APS Page (now ATS) was an option school to provide a more "traditional" style of education with contained classrooms and one teacher only back when we were all in open pods and changing teachers for different subjects. It was for people who really wanted a different learning environment (um, like HB used to be) and who would benefit from the specific differences. Like HB it evolved into an exclusive, competitive, self-selected escape hatch from the "norm" that is the rest of APS.
I think if you opened a "regular" APS elementary that is self-selected and lottery based, even with regular APS curriculum/teaching style, you would get the ATS "results." So basically what makes it successful is a motivated and self selected community.
I see more purpose for bilingual education which benefits native speakers of both languages.
I think if you're going to have an option school which provides a special "experience" you should have to demonstrate why your child specifically would benefit from that environment (like ATS or HB - which would also result in people not getting to take advantage of both in succession). Just my random thoughts.
Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting that ATS draws most from Ashlawn and McK since the SOL scores are so similar at those schools. Not as familiar with Glebe's test scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting that ATS draws most from Ashlawn and McK since the SOL scores are so similar at those schools. Not as familiar with Glebe's test scores.
I would encourage all parents to look and study the most recent APS transfer report: https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Transfer-Report-2016-17.pdf
And think really hard about how the only county wide program we have numbers on currently (ATS) draws already so heavily from NW and N Arlington and then think what it would look like if it moved further north. I am a N Arlington parent and if we're going to have these programs to help close achievement gaps ATS isn't that program. I am also not as sold on immersion, I think the campbell model and Drew are great programs. Moving or just keeping ATS is a favor to the wealthy parents in the North and upper middle class parents in S Arlington. It is not a solution to solving our diversity issues.
Look at what a county wide program does to surrounding ES boundaries. Look at Ashlawn's current boundary, it looks so crazy due to its proximity to ATS. APS staff will not release transfer data by planning unit but using the report above is helpful in seeing who these programs are really truly helping.
Further the ATS model is not what parents and educational experts are going towards which is to back track on early reading/math standards, eliminate ES homework and value unstructured play both at and away from school to help kids develop the social skills they need to be good middle and high school students. This isn't the ATS model.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting that ATS draws most from Ashlawn and McK since the SOL scores are so similar at those schools. Not as familiar with Glebe's test scores.
I would encourage all parents to look and study the most recent APS transfer report: https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Transfer-Report-2016-17.pdf
And think really hard about how the only county wide program we have numbers on currently (ATS) draws already so heavily from NW and N Arlington and then think what it would look like if it moved further north. I am a N Arlington parent and if we're going to have these programs to help close achievement gaps ATS isn't that program. I am also not as sold on immersion, I think the campbell model and Drew are great programs. Moving or just keeping ATS is a favor to the wealthy parents in the North and upper middle class parents in S Arlington. It is not a solution to solving our diversity issues.
Look at what a county wide program does to surrounding ES boundaries. Look at Ashlawn's current boundary, it looks so crazy due to its proximity to ATS. APS staff will not release transfer data by planning unit but using the report above is helpful in seeing who these programs are really truly helping.
Further the ATS model is not what parents and educational experts are going towards which is to back track on early reading/math standards, eliminate ES homework and value unstructured play both at and away from school to help kids develop the social skills they need to be good middle and high school students. This isn't the ATS model.
Option Schools/Programs
Option Schools/Programs provide specialized instructional programs. APS:
* Provides equitable access to option schools/programs for all students, including students with disabilities and English learners;
* Provides a rational and transparent process for admission to option schools/programs, which is differentiated to support the integrity of the instructional models;
* Offers preschool at each of the elementary option schools/programs; and
* Adjusts enrollment levels at the option schools/programs as needed.
Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting that ATS draws most from Ashlawn and McK since the SOL scores are so similar at those schools. Not as familiar with Glebe's test scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another vote for eliminating them. Or at least the ones that aren't really distinct options. Like ATS & Campbell. Let's do it!
+1000 - What is distinct about ATS? They have good scores, but I assume due to demographics and self selection and not the "program".
Anonymous wrote:Another vote for eliminating them. Or at least the ones that aren't really distinct options. Like ATS & Campbell. Let's do it!
Anonymous wrote:If APS/SB want to rely on a successful Arlington Tech program as a way to not build a fourth HS, they must support option schools. So it's unlikely they'd do anything to them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Language immersion certainly has value. And Key is pretty diverse socioeconomically & ethnically. We are zoned for Taylor & send our kid to Key. We certainly aren’t trying to “escape bad neighborhood schools.” I know many families zoned for Taylor and other “good” schools who value having their kids learn another language and choose immersion.
In general, more choices are better, not worse.
I agree. Unfortunately, APS is no longer in a position to try to provide added value to the education of a small subset of students.
We're not talking about a small subset of students, though. It's a substantial number, and it would be higher if there were more opportunity/space available. If you think they're providing added value, you should be arguing for expanding them, not shuttering them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Language immersion certainly has value. And Key is pretty diverse socioeconomically & ethnically. We are zoned for Taylor & send our kid to Key. We certainly aren’t trying to “escape bad neighborhood schools.” I know many families zoned for Taylor and other “good” schools who value having their kids learn another language and choose immersion.
In general, more choices are better, not worse.
I agree. Unfortunately, APS is no longer in a position to try to provide added value to the education of a small subset of students.