Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://amp.fox2detroit.com/news/local-news/black-teen-misses-bus-gets-shot-at-after-asking-for-directions-in-rochester-hills?__twitter_impression=true
Teen missed the bus. His mom had taken away his phone and was at work. Dad was deployed. He decided to walk to school but got a bit lost. He did what everyone on DCUM always argues their kid can do when their phone has been taken as a punishment: he rang a doorbell to ask for help/directions and was shot at. Luckily the overzealous homeowner missed and their Ring doorbelll camera recorded the entire encounter.
I’m all for taking away their phone as punishment, but not outside of the house. They get it when they leave for school and give it back when they return home. You can even install an app that turns the smartphone into having flip phone capabilities until you enter a master password to allow it to be a smartphone again.
This is a terrible and frightening story. But what did people do before cell phones? How on earth did we all survive?
I was never told to go up to random stranger's houses and knock on their door and I think that is not a wise thing to advise a kid to do. I would have asked a passerby for directions. I'm certainly NOT excusing the individual who tried to shoot this kid, I am only saying that going onto a stranger's property like that can be a risky proposition. It's better to ask a passerby or go into a store to ask for directions.
Anonymous wrote:I’ll wait for the authorities to release the tape before deciding who is racist.
My bet, though is that the teen (who most likely had confrontational behavior with his mom-thus the reason his phone was taken away in the first place) was not so neutral in his body language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something is off did the kid skip school and try to break in to a house
Yes, because people routinely ring doorbells to make their presence known before they rob houses![]()
Actually, yes they do, dumbass. If nobody answers the front door, then they go round the back and break in.
+1. This is a very common thing. Talk to a few cops about it. If someone answers, they try to sell them something, or they act lost. It’s pretty much the definition of casing the joint.
It’s especially dangerous for kids who are home alone and have been told to not answer the door when they don’t know the person. Then a burglary turns into a home invasion.
OK but there is zero reason to believe that this is what this kid was doing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something is off did the kid skip school and try to break in to a house
Yes, because people routinely ring doorbells to make their presence known before they rob houses![]()
Actually, yes they do, dumbass. If nobody answers the front door, then they go round the back and break in.
+1. This is a very common thing. Talk to a few cops about it. If someone answers, they try to sell them something, or they act lost. It’s pretty much the definition of casing the joint.
It’s especially dangerous for kids who are home alone and have been told to not answer the door when they don’t know the person. Then a burglary turns into a home invasion.
Anonymous wrote:Something is off did the kid skip school and try to break in to a house
Anonymous wrote:Dumb conclusion. Not so long ago, NOBODY had a phone, and people didn't accidentally get shot for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something is off did the kid skip school and try to break in to a house
Yes, because people routinely ring doorbells to make their presence known before they rob houses![]()
Actually, yes they do, dumbass. If nobody answers the front door, then they go round the back and break in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something is off did the kid skip school and try to break in to a house
Yes, because people routinely ring doorbells to make their presence known before they rob houses![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw that story, and my first reaction was not: see, the mother shouldn't have taken the teenager's phone away. My second reaction wasn't that either, or my fifth, or probably my 122nd.
Yeah. Talk about missing the point. But, hey, let's blame the mom. Instead of the ahole who shot a kid for no reason.
I agree. Yet another person who lacks critical thinking skills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kids have survived without phones in the past. The bigger question is how did he get lost on the way to school? I use to walk to school. Never heard of anyone getting lost on the way to school. The story seems to be sketchy.
The article says he usually rode the bus and on this day he missed it.
I can totally see how a teenager would think they remembered the bus route and then make a wrong turn.
Especially at 14! !4 year old boys still have a lot of maturation to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw that story, and my first reaction was not: see, the mother shouldn't have taken the teenager's phone away. My second reaction wasn't that either, or my fifth, or probably my 122nd.
Yeah. Talk about missing the point. But, hey, let's blame the mom. Instead of the ahole who shot a kid for no reason.