Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the women that I know, those who married men from a class or so below them are unhappy.
They’re used to a certain lifestyle and when the husband can’t match it, they’re frustrated and unhappy.
The class doesn’t matter as much of the husband is a high earner. But if not, it’s very very hard.
Agree? Disagree?
It's not about money, it's about views, opinions, preferences, habits, customs etc. Those require money to a certain extent but not overwhelmingly.
Let's put it this way. Marry a guy who makes less money? Sure, why not. Marry a guy who thinks children do not need language or piano lessons? Nope. Marry a guy who wears Target clothing? Sure, why not. Marry a guy who never cracks a book open, never goes to the theater or opera, never wants to do anything cultural? Nope.
Marriage is easier when you have compatible views on how money ought to be spent, how children ought to be raised, what is important to check off etc. These views differ very much across classes, and navigating them is hard work. Marriage is hard to begin with, no point making it harder than it needs to be.
I married someone from a different continent, different religion, makes less money than me, but has compatible views on child-rearing and values. We have a good marriage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's easier for men to "marry down" than it is for women. That's why you see old rich guys with young, often uneducated, women. The opposite is less common. Even highly-successful, rich, women prefer to marry even richer men, if possible.
There are a million threads on DCUM started by women who are disappointed by their lower-SES husbands. They talk of "losing respect" for their husband's career trajectory or earnings, or apparent lack of refinement. Sometimes his "trashy" inlaws are a problem too. It seems like women are just wired to want a provider, even if they don't necessarily need one.
This is true.
Men don’t care about a woman’s origins or social status. Once married a nobody woman acquired the social status of her husband. And this is the problem. An UMC woman who marries into a LMC family will feel the loss in social status. Unless her LMc born husband is outstandingly rich and successful. Even then, redneck in laws and distant cousins can be a problem.
Anonymous wrote:From the women that I know, those who married men from a class or so below them are unhappy.
They’re used to a certain lifestyle and when the husband can’t match it, they’re frustrated and unhappy.
The class doesn’t matter as much of the husband is a high earner. But if not, it’s very very hard.
Agree? Disagree?
Anonymous wrote:I think it's easier for men to "marry down" than it is for women. That's why you see old rich guys with young, often uneducated, women. The opposite is less common. Even highly-successful, rich, women prefer to marry even richer men, if possible.
There are a million threads on DCUM started by women who are disappointed by their lower-SES husbands. They talk of "losing respect" for their husband's career trajectory or earnings, or apparent lack of refinement. Sometimes his "trashy" inlaws are a problem too. It seems like women are just wired to want a provider, even if they don't necessarily need one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class difference can still matter regardless of income though it’s not true for everyone. Different tastes in food, housing, entertainment, vacations, education expectations for the children, experiences to give children. It would be miserable to disagree on so much. People can be raised with similar family incomes but still have different “class” values and tastes. But higher class tastes are certainly more expensive.
Disney vs Europe
Rooms to Go vs Antiques
Chain restaurant vs fresh food
Private school vs public
I think those fall less into differences based on upper class versus lower class, and more into differences based on douchebag versus not douchebag.
Signed, a very wealthy person (family money plus am a high earner married to a high earner) who loves disney, olive garden, public schools and state universities.
Well I love Disney (but not if it's my only trip for the year) but let's not go too far. Olive Garden? Hard pass. And some state universities are ok. UVA? Fine. UMD? Hard pass. Same with public schools. Bethesda? Fine. DC? No way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class difference can still matter regardless of income though it’s not true for everyone. Different tastes in food, housing, entertainment, vacations, education expectations for the children, experiences to give children. It would be miserable to disagree on so much. People can be raised with similar family incomes but still have different “class” values and tastes. But higher class tastes are certainly more expensive.
Disney vs Europe
Rooms to Go vs Antiques
Chain restaurant vs fresh food
Private school vs public
I think those fall less into differences based on upper class versus lower class, and more into differences based on douchebag versus not douchebag.
Signed, a very wealthy person (family money plus am a high earner married to a high earner) who loves disney, olive garden, public schools and state universities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class difference can still matter regardless of income though it’s not true for everyone. Different tastes in food, housing, entertainment, vacations, education expectations for the children, experiences to give children. It would be miserable to disagree on so much. People can be raised with similar family incomes but still have different “class” values and tastes. But higher class tastes are certainly more expensive.
Disney vs Europe
Rooms to Go vs Antiques
Chain restaurant vs fresh food
Private school vs public
Don't be ridiculous. I go to Paris Disneyland and Tokyo Disneyland![]()
I also listen to NPR and classical music.
I also like burgers and fries.
Stop it with the categorizing.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's easier for men to "marry down" than it is for women. That's why you see old rich guys with young, often uneducated, women. The opposite is less common. Even highly-successful, rich, women prefer to marry even richer men, if possible.
There are a million threads on DCUM started by women who are disappointed by their lower-SES husbands. They talk of "losing respect" for their husband's career trajectory or earnings, or apparent lack of refinement. Sometimes his "trashy" inlaws are a problem too. It seems like women are just wired to want a provider, even if they don't necessarily need one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Personally I think that education levels/ aspirations are more important than money or SES. And even then, for some “uneven” couples it works just fine.... it would not work for me though...
Pretty sure men don’t give a flying f’ about a woman’s education level beyond a certain minimum. Having been married, I can attest that diplomas on the wall were irrelevant. Even knowledge of current events was less relevant than, say, enjoying window shopping together or showering together. Not minding each other’s bullshit, which in the case of a DCUM woman seems to be feeling life should really have coughed up Cary Grant to her.
Anonymous wrote:Personally I think that education levels/ aspirations are more important than money or SES. And even then, for some “uneven” couples it works just fine.... it would not work for me though...
Anonymous wrote:Personally I think that education levels/ aspirations are more important than money or SES. And even then, for some “uneven” couples it works just fine.... it would not work for me though...