Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why I am glad my ds chose to do the IB program. His papers and exams are not only graded by his teachers, but also by the IB examiners. If his teachers aren’t teaching, everyone will know. It holds everyone to a higher standard. He doesn’t have a 4.0, but colleges will know that he is prepared.
Um, no
Wasn’t asking for opinions. He’ll be applying to some top LACs next year with a 34 ACT and a 3.8 UW GPA. We’ll talk then.
Amazing how fast the world of college admissions has changed. Just a year or two ago I'd have said these are good enough for almost any of the top LACs, but now, after what I saw this year., no. Those stats alone are not going to be good enough. {And they are terrific BTW, don't get me wrong}, but those alone won't do it. Apropos of the topic title, stats like that aren't uncommon anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not supposed to be a culling system.
If you can get an A you should get an A.
Even if you don't like it GPA no matter how hard the school is the greatest predictor of college success.
A's are being given away at many schools. Not meaningful.
So what... and C's get degrees. Get a life.
Thanks, but I have a great life. There was mention of why not just grades should be considered for college admissions.Easy A's at many schools complicate the process. I think we're all aware of C students who go to college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why I am glad my ds chose to do the IB program. His papers and exams are not only graded by his teachers, but also by the IB examiners. If his teachers aren’t teaching, everyone will know. It holds everyone to a higher standard. He doesn’t have a 4.0, but colleges will know that he is prepared.
Um, no
Wasn’t asking for opinions. He’ll be applying to some top LACs next year with a 34 ACT and a 3.8 UW GPA. We’ll talk then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why I am glad my ds chose to do the IB program. His papers and exams are not only graded by his teachers, but also by the IB examiners. If his teachers aren’t teaching, everyone will know. It holds everyone to a higher standard. He doesn’t have a 4.0, but colleges will know that he is prepared.
Um, no
Anonymous wrote:Personally I would love to see a 100 point scale, and a push towards greater consistency nationwide. I admit our private school gives a lot of credit in taking AP exams even for the unweighted GPA- I.e a B grade preAP gets up to an A if you get a 5 on the exam. But an A stays an A. So a college really has no way of differentiating our top students.
Anonymous wrote:This is why I am glad my ds chose to do the IB program. His papers and exams are not only graded by his teachers, but also by the IB examiners. If his teachers aren’t teaching, everyone will know. It holds everyone to a higher standard. He doesn’t have a 4.0, but colleges will know that he is prepared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not supposed to be a culling system.
If you can get an A you should get an A.
Even if you don't like it GPA no matter how hard the school is the greatest predictor of college success.
A's are being given away at many schools. Not meaningful.
So what... and C's get degrees. Get a life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not supposed to be a culling system.
If you can get an A you should get an A.
Even if you don't like it GPA no matter how hard the school is the greatest predictor of college success.
I've also seen studies, and a recent Wall Street Journal article this month, that say the opposite. Also, what constitutes college success? DS is currently in advanced physics and calculus courses at a top 20 university but he will get a B in those courses. His cousins, will both graduate from college with nearly straight A's but they refuse to take any math or science courses because of the tough grading. One is majoring in illustration, the other in education. I guess, they are "doing better" in college, but are they really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not supposed to be a culling system.
If you can get an A you should get an A.
Even if you don't like it GPA no matter how hard the school is the greatest predictor of college success.
I've also seen studies, and a recent Wall Street Journal article this month, that say the opposite. Also, what constitutes college success? DS is currently in advanced physics and calculus courses at a top 20 university but he will get a B in those courses. His cousins, will both graduate from college with nearly straight A's but they refuse to take any math or science courses because of the tough grading. One is majoring in illustration, the other in education. I guess, they are "doing better" in college, but are they really?
Your a lunatic. Why the F do you know your nephews grades.
Success is getting a degree in something you will enjoy and beingbable to be gainfully employed. A study shows that students in the top 1/3 of an average college do better job wise than kids in the lower 1/3 of an Ivy. .. simply because the Ivy kids can't handle not bring the best. It's pathetic.
Studies also show kids that think a B is bad score drop out of science at an alarming rate and it's not because they can't do it,it's because their ridiculous parents can't handle B's.
It's not a cullingbsystrm. We need an educated country, we should educate everybody we can and who wants an education.
It is my DS (son) not nephew. And, I know his grades because he tells me. He just called and said he got a 69 on advanced physics test but he isn't worried because he'll pass the class. We said "ok," carry on. One could argue that he doesn't need to tell me his grades, but we are paying the bills. (I also know a bit about his female cousins' grades because the parents tell us.) The point being, in college, just like in high school, grades are not the definitive definition of success.
Your comments imply that you think that your nieces are not successful or that your son is somehow better than them because he’s majoring in a science and they’re majoring in education/illustration. Why?
NP. You're being deliberately obtuse and argumentative. Clearly getting a degree in illustration (WTF?) is not as intellectually rigorous or demanding. In fact, one could argue that it doesn't even belong in a university, as is the case in much of the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not supposed to be a culling system.
If you can get an A you should get an A.
Even if you don't like it GPA no matter how hard the school is the greatest predictor of college success.
I've also seen studies, and a recent Wall Street Journal article this month, that say the opposite. Also, what constitutes college success? DS is currently in advanced physics and calculus courses at a top 20 university but he will get a B in those courses. His cousins, will both graduate from college with nearly straight A's but they refuse to take any math or science courses because of the tough grading. One is majoring in illustration, the other in education. I guess, they are "doing better" in college, but are they really?
Your a lunatic. Why the F do you know your nephews grades.
Success is getting a degree in something you will enjoy and beingbable to be gainfully employed. A study shows that students in the top 1/3 of an average college do better job wise than kids in the lower 1/3 of an Ivy. .. simply because the Ivy kids can't handle not bring the best. It's pathetic.
Studies also show kids that think a B is bad score drop out of science at an alarming rate and it's not because they can't do it,it's because their ridiculous parents can't handle B's.
It's not a cullingbsystrm. We need an educated country, we should educate everybody we can and who wants an education.
It is my DS (son) not nephew. And, I know his grades because he tells me. He just called and said he got a 69 on advanced physics test but he isn't worried because he'll pass the class. We said "ok," carry on. One could argue that he doesn't need to tell me his grades, but we are paying the bills. (I also know a bit about his female cousins' grades because the parents tell us.) The point being, in college, just like in high school, grades are not the definitive definition of success.
Your comments imply that you think that your nieces are not successful or that your son is somehow better than them because he’s majoring in a science and they’re majoring in education/illustration. Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not supposed to be a culling system.
If you can get an A you should get an A.
Even if you don't like it GPA no matter how hard the school is the greatest predictor of college success.
I've also seen studies, and a recent Wall Street Journal article this month, that say the opposite. Also, what constitutes college success? DS is currently in advanced physics and calculus courses at a top 20 university but he will get a B in those courses. His cousins, will both graduate from college with nearly straight A's but they refuse to take any math or science courses because of the tough grading. One is majoring in illustration, the other in education. I guess, they are "doing better" in college, but are they really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not supposed to be a culling system.
If you can get an A you should get an A.
Even if you don't like it GPA no matter how hard the school is the greatest predictor of college success.
I've also seen studies, and a recent Wall Street Journal article this month, that say the opposite. Also, what constitutes college success? DS is currently in advanced physics and calculus courses at a top 20 university but he will get a B in those courses. His cousins, will both graduate from college with nearly straight A's but they refuse to take any math or science courses because of the tough grading. One is majoring in illustration, the other in education. I guess, they are "doing better" in college, but are they really?
Your a lunatic. Why the F do you know your nephews grades.
Success is getting a degree in something you will enjoy and beingbable to be gainfully employed. A study shows that students in the top 1/3 of an average college do better job wise than kids in the lower 1/3 of an Ivy. .. simply because the Ivy kids can't handle not bring the best. It's pathetic.
Studies also show kids that think a B is bad score drop out of science at an alarming rate and it's not because they can't do it,it's because their ridiculous parents can't handle B's.
It's not a cullingbsystrm. We need an educated country, we should educate everybody we can and who wants an education.
It is my DS (son) not nephew. And, I know his grades because he tells me. He just called and said he got a 69 on advanced physics test but he isn't worried because he'll pass the class. We said "ok," carry on. One could argue that he doesn't need to tell me his grades, but we are paying the bills. (I also know a bit about his female cousins' grades because the parents tell us.) The point being, in college, just like in high school, grades are not the definitive definition of success.
Your comments imply that you think that your nieces are not successful or that your son is somehow better than them because he’s majoring in a science and they’re majoring in education/illustration. Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not supposed to be a culling system.
If you can get an A you should get an A.
Even if you don't like it GPA no matter how hard the school is the greatest predictor of college success.
I've also seen studies, and a recent Wall Street Journal article this month, that say the opposite. Also, what constitutes college success? DS is currently in advanced physics and calculus courses at a top 20 university but he will get a B in those courses. His cousins, will both graduate from college with nearly straight A's but they refuse to take any math or science courses because of the tough grading. One is majoring in illustration, the other in education. I guess, they are "doing better" in college, but are they really?
Your a lunatic. Why the F do you know your nephews grades.
Success is getting a degree in something you will enjoy and beingbable to be gainfully employed. A study shows that students in the top 1/3 of an average college do better job wise than kids in the lower 1/3 of an Ivy. .. simply because the Ivy kids can't handle not bring the best. It's pathetic.
Studies also show kids that think a B is bad score drop out of science at an alarming rate and it's not because they can't do it,it's because their ridiculous parents can't handle B's.
It's not a cullingbsystrm. We need an educated country, we should educate everybody we can and who wants an education.
It is my DS (son) not nephew. And, I know his grades because he tells me. He just called and said he got a 69 on advanced physics test but he isn't worried because he'll pass the class. We said "ok," carry on. One could argue that he doesn't need to tell me his grades, but we are paying the bills. (I also know a bit about his female cousins' grades because the parents tell us.) The point being, in college, just like in high school, grades are not the definitive definition of success.