Anonymous wrote:Everyone has touched on a lot of the aspects. For me, (and you can take this as a positive or a negative, it’s both) it was easier to “hover” more and become a helicopter parent. With all of the additional involvement in private schools, it’s very tempted to over insert yourself. I have to take a step back sometimes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, this is really helpful. We are looking at private, but haven't made a final decision yet. DH doesn't have any experience with private school, whereas I do (though it was only for HS). These insights help frame our thinking!
thumb up for private school over public school
My son who just recently graduated from college could have attended public Langley HS. Instead his mother sent him to Sidwell and it was the best thing we did for him. Private school taught him critical thinking which is something they taught in public school. My daughter didn't get accepted into Sidwell so she attended Langley HS and don't get me wrong, Langley HS is a good school but it is NOT Sidwell. She was a good student at Langley HS but she is really struggling at UVA.
my 2c
OP here. I totally agree. I went to public for ES and MS, and then Andover for HS. It completely changed me (for the better!). In my MS--despite its being a strong public school--it wasn't "cool" to enjoy learning. I got made fun of for answering questions. The kids just wanted to get A's so they could go to a good college and make a ton of money.
At Andover, everyone is a nerd and has their own passion. It was awesome. I learned how to think critically on a level I think my local HS would not have provided. I learned how to cope with a ton of academic pressure. I learned that, even though I was at the top of my class in MS, I would never be the smartest kid in any of my classes at Andover. I had friends who tested out of BC calculus their freshman year. They ended up doing an independent math seminar. I had a friend who invented a new geometry theorem. I had a friend whose curation work at one of Andover's museums won her a Rhodes scholarship. These kids were just on a different level, and it was a very humbling experience.
Anyway, long story short -- I think a strong private HS can be an incredible experience. In some ways, it can almost ruin college for a kid because you basically end up going to the rough equivalent of a liberal arts college for high school (that's a different story altogether, and speaks to the importance of picking the right college for a kid who has had such a robust HS experience). I just don't have exposure to lower school privates, so it's helpful to hear other people's experiences.
Thanks for sharing your perspective. What school would you consider sending your kids to in the DMV? I ask because while I didn't go to Andover, I went to Boarding school in England and had an awesome experience. Unfortunately, I don't think we can afford boarding school for our son and he has a brother that is 2 1/2 years younger than him and I really can't see splitting them up.
Anonymous wrote:Funny how public v private pretty much makes zero difference when actually out in the workforce. I see no evidence that private school kids in my field are better critical thinkers, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, this is really helpful. We are looking at private, but haven't made a final decision yet. DH doesn't have any experience with private school, whereas I do (though it was only for HS). These insights help frame our thinking!
thumb up for private school over public school
My son who just recently graduated from college could have attended public Langley HS. Instead his mother sent him to Sidwell and it was the best thing we did for him. Private school taught him critical thinking which is something they taught in public school. My daughter didn't get accepted into Sidwell so she attended Langley HS and don't get me wrong, Langley HS is a good school but it is NOT Sidwell. She was a good student at Langley HS but she is really struggling at UVA.
my 2c
OP here. I totally agree. I went to public for ES and MS, and then Andover for HS. It completely changed me (for the better!). In my MS--despite its being a strong public school--it wasn't "cool" to enjoy learning. I got made fun of for answering questions. The kids just wanted to get A's so they could go to a good college and make a ton of money.
At Andover, everyone is a nerd and has their own passion. It was awesome. I learned how to think critically on a level I think my local HS would not have provided. I learned how to cope with a ton of academic pressure. I learned that, even though I was at the top of my class in MS, I would never be the smartest kid in any of my classes at Andover. I had friends who tested out of BC calculus their freshman year. They ended up doing an independent math seminar. I had a friend who invented a new geometry theorem. I had a friend whose curation work at one of Andover's museums won her a Rhodes scholarship. These kids were just on a different level, and it was a very humbling experience.
Anyway, long story short -- I think a strong private HS can be an incredible experience. In some ways, it can almost ruin college for a kid because you basically end up going to the rough equivalent of a liberal arts college for high school (that's a different story altogether, and speaks to the importance of picking the right college for a kid who has had such a robust HS experience). I just don't have exposure to lower school privates, so it's helpful to hear other people's experiences.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks, everyone. One additional question: Did you ever feel as though the school was catering *too* much to your kid? In other words, was your kid getting a sense of entitlement? We really want to balance making sure our kid gets a high quality education with trying to avoid her feeling a sense of entitlement. I know it's really hard to do, and that there are plenty of entitled kids in public schools, but I wonder if it's a risk in having such small class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:Went from APS to private. Biggest difference was the lack of standardized testing and all that involves.
Anonymous wrote:APS through 5th, then private. Also had a child who went K-12 at APS. Biggest differences we saw:
* Much stronger writing instruction -- and in virtually every class (history, science, even math)
* (Obviously) much smaller classes (average size 12-15) -- means that more introverted students are invited into the conversation every day. They cover a lot of material more quickly, as fewer distractions. Lots of class discussions.
* A real effort to ensure every student is engaged in something outside of coursework. Participation in extra- curriculars is required, and they work with students to ensure they find their passions.
Not a knock on APS -- we were very happy with our older child's education. But as more students are in APS schools, it is simply harder for teachers to meet each child where they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, this is really helpful. We are looking at private, but haven't made a final decision yet. DH doesn't have any experience with private school, whereas I do (though it was only for HS). These insights help frame our thinking!
thumb up for private school over public school
My son who just recently graduated from college could have attended public Langley HS. Instead his mother sent him to Sidwell and it was the best thing we did for him. Private school taught him critical thinking which is something they taught in public school. My daughter didn't get accepted into Sidwell so she attended Langley HS and don't get me wrong, Langley HS is a good school but it is NOT Sidwell. She was a good student at Langley HS but she is really struggling at UVA.
my 2c
OP here. I totally agree. I went to public for ES and MS, and then Andover for HS. It completely changed me (for the better!). In my MS--despite its being a strong public school--it wasn't "cool" to enjoy learning. I got made fun of for answering questions. The kids just wanted to get A's so they could go to a good college and make a ton of money.
At Andover, everyone is a nerd and has their own passion. It was awesome. I learned how to think critically on a level I think my local HS would not have provided. I learned how to cope with a ton of academic pressure. I learned that, even though I was at the top of my class in MS, I would never be the smartest kid in any of my classes at Andover. I had friends who tested out of BC calculus their freshman year. They ended up doing an independent math seminar. I had a friend who invented a new geometry theorem. I had a friend whose curation work at one of Andover's museums won her a Rhodes scholarship. These kids were just on a different level, and it was a very humbling experience.
Anyway, long story short -- I think a strong private HS can be an incredible experience. In some ways, it can almost ruin college for a kid because you basically end up going to the rough equivalent of a liberal arts college for high school (that's a different story altogether, and speaks to the importance of picking the right college for a kid who has had such a robust HS experience). I just don't have exposure to lower school privates, so it's helpful to hear other people's experiences.
Interesting. We just made the decision to NOT send DC to a private boarding up in New England for precisely this reason. What would college teach DC that would be more or better than a potential board experience? This is not to say that boards are bad because places like Andover and SPS are great schools. But aside from churning more DCs to the Ivies than private options here in DC, I'm not convinced that the right DC private couldn't also strongly benefit and harness top intellectual talent, prepping DC for an Ivie or equivalent for college. Again, I like the boards, but it's also nice for kids to be able to enjoy the ride a bit. They will all reach that harkness level of academic nirvana in college. A different view.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, this is really helpful. We are looking at private, but haven't made a final decision yet. DH doesn't have any experience with private school, whereas I do (though it was only for HS). These insights help frame our thinking!
thumb up for private school over public school
My son who just recently graduated from college could have attended public Langley HS. Instead his mother sent him to Sidwell and it was the best thing we did for him. Private school taught him critical thinking which is something they taught in public school. My daughter didn't get accepted into Sidwell so she attended Langley HS and don't get me wrong, Langley HS is a good school but it is NOT Sidwell. She was a good student at Langley HS but she is really struggling at UVA.
my 2c
OP here. I totally agree. I went to public for ES and MS, and then Andover for HS. It completely changed me (for the better!). In my MS--despite its being a strong public school--it wasn't "cool" to enjoy learning. I got made fun of for answering questions. The kids just wanted to get A's so they could go to a good college and make a ton of money.
At Andover, everyone is a nerd and has their own passion. It was awesome. I learned how to think critically on a level I think my local HS would not have provided. I learned how to cope with a ton of academic pressure. I learned that, even though I was at the top of my class in MS, I would never be the smartest kid in any of my classes at Andover. I had friends who tested out of BC calculus their freshman year. They ended up doing an independent math seminar. I had a friend who invented a new geometry theorem. I had a friend whose curation work at one of Andover's museums won her a Rhodes scholarship. These kids were just on a different level, and it was a very humbling experience.
Anyway, long story short -- I think a strong private HS can be an incredible experience. In some ways, it can almost ruin college for a kid because you basically end up going to the rough equivalent of a liberal arts college for high school (that's a different story altogether, and speaks to the importance of picking the right college for a kid who has had such a robust HS experience). I just don't have exposure to lower school privates, so it's helpful to hear other people's experiences.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks, everyone. One additional question: Did you ever feel as though the school was catering *too* much to your kid? In other words, was your kid getting a sense of entitlement? We really want to balance making sure our kid gets a high quality education with trying to avoid her feeling a sense of entitlement. I know it's really hard to do, and that there are plenty of entitled kids in public schools, but I wonder if it's a risk in having such small class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:We haven't found that. There is a lot of accountability for turning in work on time, showing up on time, etc --- in fact more than we found at APS. We have also insisted our kids have summer jobs, etc -- underscoring the importance of working not expecting things to be delivered to you. Good luck with your decision!