Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What ultimately stopped me from lobbying for a 4th comprehensive was its location in the south and the fact that it would ultimately be made disproportionately of FARMs students. W-L is a great site for bringing North and South together, and the Career Center is more centrally located in the same way.
But I agree that Kenmore has superior land available to it and the whole thing makes me angry. But ... once a student population is around 45% FARMs, it's a bit doomed in terms of achievement, and that's the way a Kenmore High seemed, to me, likely to be zoned under this School Board's way of doing things.
Not very different from Wakefield today.
Anonymous wrote:What ultimately stopped me from lobbying for a 4th comprehensive was its location in the south and the fact that it would ultimately be made disproportionately of FARMs students. W-L is a great site for bringing North and South together, and the Career Center is more centrally located in the same way.
But I agree that Kenmore has superior land available to it and the whole thing makes me angry. But ... once a student population is around 45% FARMs, it's a bit doomed in terms of achievement, and that's the way a Kenmore High seemed, to me, likely to be zoned under this School Board's way of doing things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But won't the Career Center remain an option school, not a neighborhood school? Is the school board's plan to require the Career Center, which I thought was being billed as a hands-on learning almost vo-tech type school with no arts or sports options on site as a neighborhood school for local residents?
That's what the plan was. Now the immediate neighborhood sees an opportunity to grab the school for themselves to create a wealthier HS, for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of folks seem to think the Career Center site is a shoe-in for a fourth comprehensive high school. But a lot of people think Kenmore makes more sense, regardless of the current traffic complaint. So, given the current process to add seats to the Career Center site and the very limited budget and phased approach to increasing capacity there, why should that be the location for a fourth comprehensive high school? Considering the various programs and the elementary school currently there, and the acreage being less than a third of the acreage at Kenmore, how/why would this make sense? How/why would this be the most efficient and feasible solution to high school capacity in the timeframe needed?
It’s not just a “severe” traffic complaint, and the fact that the local neighborhood fought tooth and nails against this in full force.
In addition to that, Murphy’s staff had done a comprehensive analysis of several sites last year and found that the main problem was a “lack of egress” and that the property borders to Fairfax County and issues that pertained to that. With that full analysis Murphy’s staff ruled the Kenmore site completely out for further consideration for a high school or any other school (they had hoped for an additional elementary school there at one time, too, which had been shot down, too). You can probably still find the papers of that analysis online. It’s not happening at the Kenmore site. That ship has sailed.
Anonymous wrote:There is a meeting tonight if you have strong opinion about this
Anonymous wrote:It occurs to me that any way a 4th HS happens, Arlington Forest and Glen Carlyn are going to be rezoned to Wakefield because they'll have to expand that boundary N if the school loses all its SE PU's to a new HS at the Career Center.
Anonymous wrote:APS has a walk zone map for the Career Center.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-FEQerA0GASuh_Ej9s6zBf7IROLwIZiCYsn8rbiUt20/edit?usp=sharing
It seems to pulling a lot from North Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Arlington Tech is unlikely to ever shed the vocational school tag. This isn’t necessarily fair given what they are trying to do with the program and I love vocational schools. But perceptions will persist and it won’t really appeal to the Type A demographic that dominates Arlington.
Unless they pump a ton of money into science labs (or things like that) and somehow make it “elite,” the number of kids zoned to Yorktown who go there will be painfully low. It won’t make a dent into overcrowding. And, because of that, the money put into it will be a waste.
The kids going there now have come pretty equally from Yorktown, W-L, Wakefield zones.
I've heard anecdotes of students returning to their neighborhood schools -- is anyone tracking how many do that, and whether the returns are also balanced among schools?
Anonymous wrote:
Arlington Tech is unlikely to ever shed the vocational school tag. This isn’t necessarily fair given what they are trying to do with the program and I love vocational schools. But perceptions will persist and it won’t really appeal to the Type A demographic that dominates Arlington.
Unless they pump a ton of money into science labs (or things like that) and somehow make it “elite,” the number of kids zoned to Yorktown who go there will be painfully low. It won’t make a dent into overcrowding. And, because of that, the money put into it will be a waste.