Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a situation in my own family, right down to the age of MIL and BFF. Weird and sad.
In my family's situation, there's no fix and no way to help. Any sort of interference would only make an awful situation even worse.
The son has made his choices blatantly clear -- his loyalty lies with his wife. Wife has been difficult (at best) since the earliest days. She's an awful person and the son is equally culpable. People try to avoid saying it, because "he's a nice guy" but there's no excuse for either of them. I tried to keep an open mind for a long time, but eventually realized that was equivalent to condoning their behavior. It's a complex situation and a very sad one for the whole family.
If they've been BFFs for that long, MIL is likely just venting her frustration at seeing her dear friend hurt over and over. There's nothing for you to actually do.
OP here. thank you; you understand. I don't understand people attacking me -- these are not superficial relationships. these people are essentially family, and this rift has caused major problems in what used to be a happy group.
I'm trying to figure out a way to see if we are talking about the same situation, because the similarities are significant. Did MIL's friend just retire?
No, she still works.
Anonymous wrote:If you'd like to stand up for this woman, I'd do subtle things. Like tell the Son/DIL how wonderful MIL-BFF is to your children. How she's so patient and loving and your kids just adore her. How she's generous and kind with them. How lucky your kids are to have a Bonus Grandma in their lives. Things like that.
If they tell you what a witch she is, response with something like "huh. That has not been our experience with MIL-BFF".
That's about it. You can't force people to spend time or to act loving.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a situation in my own family, right down to the age of MIL and BFF. Weird and sad.
In my family's situation, there's no fix and no way to help. Any sort of interference would only make an awful situation even worse.
The son has made his choices blatantly clear -- his loyalty lies with his wife. Wife has been difficult (at best) since the earliest days. She's an awful person and the son is equally culpable. People try to avoid saying it, because "he's a nice guy" but there's no excuse for either of them. I tried to keep an open mind for a long time, but eventually realized that was equivalent to condoning their behavior. It's a complex situation and a very sad one for the whole family.
If they've been BFFs for that long, MIL is likely just venting her frustration at seeing her dear friend hurt over and over. There's nothing for you to actually do.
OP here. thank you; you understand. I don't understand people attacking me -- these are not superficial relationships. these people are essentially family, and this rift has caused major problems in what used to be a happy group.
I'm trying to figure out a way to see if we are talking about the same situation, because the similarities are significant. Did MIL's friend just retire?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a situation in my own family, right down to the age of MIL and BFF. Weird and sad.
In my family's situation, there's no fix and no way to help. Any sort of interference would only make an awful situation even worse.
The son has made his choices blatantly clear -- his loyalty lies with his wife. Wife has been difficult (at best) since the earliest days. She's an awful person and the son is equally culpable. People try to avoid saying it, because "he's a nice guy" but there's no excuse for either of them. I tried to keep an open mind for a long time, but eventually realized that was equivalent to condoning their behavior. It's a complex situation and a very sad one for the whole family.
If they've been BFFs for that long, MIL is likely just venting her frustration at seeing her dear friend hurt over and over. There's nothing for you to actually do.
OP here. thank you; you understand. I don't understand people attacking me -- these are not superficial relationships. these people are essentially family, and this rift has caused major problems in what used to be a happy group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a situation in my own family, right down to the age of MIL and BFF. Weird and sad.
In my family's situation, there's no fix and no way to help. Any sort of interference would only make an awful situation even worse.
The son has made his choices blatantly clear -- his loyalty lies with his wife. Wife has been difficult (at best) since the earliest days. She's an awful person and the son is equally culpable. People try to avoid saying it, because "he's a nice guy" but there's no excuse for either of them. I tried to keep an open mind for a long time, but eventually realized that was equivalent to condoning their behavior. It's a complex situation and a very sad one for the whole family.
If they've been BFFs for that long, MIL is likely just venting her frustration at seeing her dear friend hurt over and over. There's nothing for you to actually do.
OP here. thank you; you understand. I don't understand people attacking me -- these are not superficial relationships. these people are essentially family, and this rift has caused major problems in what used to be a happy group.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a situation in my own family, right down to the age of MIL and BFF. Weird and sad.
In my family's situation, there's no fix and no way to help. Any sort of interference would only make an awful situation even worse.
The son has made his choices blatantly clear -- his loyalty lies with his wife. Wife has been difficult (at best) since the earliest days. She's an awful person and the son is equally culpable. People try to avoid saying it, because "he's a nice guy" but there's no excuse for either of them. I tried to keep an open mind for a long time, but eventually realized that was equivalent to condoning their behavior. It's a complex situation and a very sad one for the whole family.
If they've been BFFs for that long, MIL is likely just venting her frustration at seeing her dear friend hurt over and over. There's nothing for you to actually do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about how you've been together with them multiple times even though she only gets to see him every 6-8 weeks. Why were you there? Was it the friend's choice or her son and daughter-in-law who invited you?
because I've been with my husband for years. these are pretty longstanding relationships all around.
Your OP says she only sees them every 6-8 months and that the boy is only 4 years old. No way you've been present for every meeting so this all sounds like a bunch of BS you've cooked up.