Their investment returns were not really that bad. I think it was 11% if I remember correctly. The reason it looks bad is because their new Investment head insisted on rewriting the fair market value assessments for some of their investments. This probably works well for him, because then he can show good returns in the future years, since 2016 was his first year at Harvard. If they had not done that, their investment return would have been respectable. The board turned down his request for even deeper corrections, else it would have looked even worse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jealous haters gonna hate. Even Homer sometimes nods.

typical harvardian hubris...yes you are the best, you are perfect, everyone is jealous of you and hates how fabulous you are

+1
Harvard parents think everyone is jealous. LOL

well the Harvard stereotype of extreme arrogance exists for a reason...

Arrogance is just arrogance. Don't try to fine the reason of arrogance from outside. Dumm

This makes zero sense

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jealous haters gonna hate. Even Homer sometimes nods.

typical harvardian hubris...yes you are the best, you are perfect, everyone is jealous of you and hates how fabulous you are

+1
Harvard parents think everyone is jealous. LOL

well the Harvard stereotype of extreme arrogance exists for a reason...

Arrogance is just arrogance. Don't try to fine the reason of arrogance from outside. Dumm

go back to school to learn english please

The only thing you are proud of is English? Go to kindergarten to learn what manner is.

DP I find it somewhat strange that you can’t string a coherent sentence together and yet you feel compelled to share your thoughts on Harvard’s endowment. And I don’t believe the PP was proud of her English skills, she was merely pointing out that yours are somewhat lacking.