Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do you know that he's a good journalist on education specifically?
Because. I. Read. The. Book.
It is well-researched and well-argued. I'm university professor and part of my job is evaluating research and scholarship by other people, and this struck me as a very solid and persuasive book, overall. FWIW, it also received numerous excellent reviews. Did I agree with every single statement in it? No, of course not. There were a few bits where I thought he needed more, or didn't ask questions he should have asked or discuss issues he should have discussed, etc. But as a product, myself, of several super-duper elite institutions (fancy prep school, fancy college, fancy scholarship to fancy foreign country, fancy professional school, and succession of fancy jobs at elite institutions and universities), and with kids at an expensive elite private school, I found the book thought-provoking and useful. It made me think somewhat differently about how to steer my own children when college frenzy begins.
Read it and judge for yourself. Maybe it will not change your views, but maybe it will.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He used to be the New York Times food critic, and had also covered the White House and been a movie critic, before moving to the op-ed side. In other words, hard to say that education is his specialty so I take his views with no greater credibility than any other journalist writing on the subject.
That Bruni? Oh for heaven's sake, why would I spent time reading his opinion on colleges in America. Thanks for letting me know. I had heard of the book. What a waste of time that would have been. He probably had it ghosted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This may be hard to believe, but it's actually quite possible for people with nice diplomas to be successful human beings too.
+1
I went to an elite uni in my home country. Most of my "professional" friends in the US have HYPS degrees. Lovely people, and just brilliant. Articulate, polished, well-networked. Most of my local "mom" friends went to JMU, VCU, GMU, etc. Also lovely people, but nowhere near as bright or successful. Obviously, just my personal experience, but the difference really is glaring. Are they both happy? Sure, probably in their own way. But they are not equivalent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This may be hard to believe, but it's actually quite possible for people with nice diplomas to be successful human beings too.
+1
I went to an elite uni in my home country. Most of my "professional" friends in the US have HYPS degrees. Lovely people, and just brilliant. Articulate, polished, well-networked. Most of my local "mom" friends went to JMU, VCU, GMU, etc. Also lovely people, but nowhere near as bright or successful. Obviously, just my personal experience, but the difference really is glaring. Are they both happy? Sure, probably in their own way. But they are not equivalent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From my experience, many education consultants in DC also have the same view as Mr. Bruni. In fact, I've even heard the Director of Admissions at a Big 3 make many of these same points.
Seems ironic, given how hard Big 3-type schools try to outplace so many of their students in HYPS-type schools.
Anonymous wrote:This may be hard to believe, but it's actually quite possible for people with nice diplomas to be successful human beings too.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, it took less than three minutes for the first sneering response to be posted. Probably not a DCUM record, but most impressive, PP. Please don't keep being you.
Anonymous wrote:So is going to George Mason ok? Is that what you want for your kids?
Anonymous wrote:So is going to George Mason ok? Is that what you want for your kids?
Anonymous wrote:From my experience, many education consultants in DC also have the same view as Mr. Bruni. In fact, I've even heard the Director of Admissions at a Big 3 make many of these same points.
Anonymous wrote:Of course, there is this thing called "research." Good journalists tend to be rather good at the whole research thing. Maybe consider reading the book before deciding you couldn't possibly learn anything from it?
Anonymous wrote:Congratulations, you cited a single thread on an anonymous message board where the posters are predominately from the DC area. That hardly refutes my claim that only a small minority of Americans think this way, and I don't know anyone personally who posted in the thread.