Anonymous wrote:We definitely define work differently as you think people retire from parenting.
Anonymous wrote:We definitely define work differently as you think people retire from parenting.
Anonymous wrote:It may not be to you but it is to her.
You can deride women for limiting their choices then also criticize them when they recognize the fallout from those choices and make appropriate decisions. If you don’t need money you aren’t picking up menial work you don’t enjoy in your 50’s. If you have the option to not work and choose to work in any way you choose, good for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re acting like people take jobs as cashiers for Walmart for “fun”. They don’t, they take those because they need them. I have friends who “work” 3 hours a week at Williams Sonoma or fancy boutique olive oil stores. One works as a gardener for a private residence. One works as a personal trainer a few hours a week. These are choices people make to benefit themselves- not to rock the corporate world at 52. Choices are always a luxury.
So high end service jobs for 3 hours a week. Or doing your hobby for a friend or two.
That’s not debating whether or not to go back to work.
Again, clueless.
Those are things retirees do, which is what this thread is about.
Anonymous wrote:So you also retired from parenting once your children turn 18? It’s just a strange way of looking at parenting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re acting like people take jobs as cashiers for Walmart for “fun”. They don’t, they take those because they need them. I have friends who “work” 3 hours a week at Williams Sonoma or fancy boutique olive oil stores. One works as a gardener for a private residence. One works as a personal trainer a few hours a week. These are choices people make to benefit themselves- not to rock the corporate world at 52. Choices are always a luxury.
So high end service jobs for 3 hours a week. Or doing your hobby for a friend or two.
That’s not debating whether or not to go back to work.
Again, clueless.
Anonymous wrote:You’re acting like people take jobs as cashiers for Walmart for “fun”. They don’t, they take those because they need them. I have friends who “work” 3 hours a week at Williams Sonoma or fancy boutique olive oil stores. One works as a gardener for a private residence. One works as a personal trainer a few hours a week. These are choices people make to benefit themselves- not to rock the corporate world at 52. Choices are always a luxury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For a SAHM, once your kids go off to college - you are retired. Doesn't matter what age you are - this is what retirement looks like.
My kids are still in ES but I list myself as “retired” . My income is interest based from investment.
No, you still have to pick them up, take care of them -- you're still a SAHM.
Okay, but the bank doesn’t care about that.
So? You can be independently wealthy or a trust-fund baby and still be working as a SAHM. My point is that once your kids are out of the house - your job as a SAHM is over and you are retired.
So you’re saying they are retired from something that offered no pay? How odd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For a SAHM, once your kids go off to college - you are retired. Doesn't matter what age you are - this is what retirement looks like.
My kids are still in ES but I list myself as “retired” . My income is interest based from investment.
No, you still have to pick them up, take care of them -- you're still a SAHM.
Okay, but the bank doesn’t care about that.
So? You can be independently wealthy or a trust-fund baby and still be working as a SAHM. My point is that once your kids are out of the house - your job as a SAHM is over and you are retired.