Anonymous wrote:I am in complete agreement that pockets of high-income families should not be "gerrymandered" in to the schools they want, but that is not the case for these few Rolling Valley subdivisions that go to Key/Lee. If, for instance, those subdivisions were high rise apartments with low income families I would absolutely feel the same way - that those few kids who spent 7 years at Rolling Valley building friendships, community, and support networks not to mention belonging to the same pools, sports teams, and churches as the RVES kids that go to West Springfield HS should absolutely be able to continue on with their community.
It's such a tiny group of people. If it were more equal then a split is fine, but it's only a very small group of kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS (at least in the eastern part of the county) has blatantly set up a system of high SES/low SES schools. It has concentrated poverty at certain schools in a misguided effort to provide “enhanced services” for lower income populations at those schools. It’s not working.
+1. I've heard it was done intentionally as well. They will have to do an entire redistricting at the elementary, middle, and high school level to fix it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS (at least in the eastern part of the county) has blatantly set up a system of high SES/low SES schools. It has concentrated poverty at certain schools in a misguided effort to provide “enhanced services” for lower income populations at those schools. It’s not working.
+1. I've heard it was done intentionally as well. They will have to do an entire redistricting at the elementary, middle, and high school level to fix it.
Anonymous wrote:FCPS (at least in the eastern part of the county) has blatantly set up a system of high SES/low SES schools. It has concentrated poverty at certain schools in a misguided effort to provide “enhanced services” for lower income populations at those schools. It’s not working.
Anonymous wrote:FCPS (at least in the eastern part of the county) has blatantly set up a system of high SES/low SES schools. It has concentrated poverty at certain schools in a misguided effort to provide “enhanced services” for lower income populations at those schools. It’s not working.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not all of Hunt valley went to Lee. Just the area across the parkway. I’m curious about this because hunt valley is pretty full and it seems like they would want to address that. But then it would probably involve newington forest and south county.
Hunt valley is not very full.
My kids classes are between 24 to 2i kids.
We have no trailer classrooms. There is on trailer on campus and that is for something like music.
It is a nice, smaller school.
And yes, most of Hunt Valley has always been zoned for West Springfield High School. It has WSHS and over a half dozen other elementary schools between HV and Lee. There is not logical reason to have HV attending Lee when there are so many other schools that are closer.
Anonymous wrote:I am in complete agreement that pockets of high-income families should not be "gerrymandered" in to the schools they want, but that is not the case for these few Rolling Valley subdivisions that go to Key/Lee. If, for instance, those subdivisions were high rise apartments with low income families I would absolutely feel the same way - that those few kids who spent 7 years at Rolling Valley building friendships, community, and support networks not to mention belonging to the same pools, sports teams, and churches as the RVES kids that go to West Springfield HS should absolutely be able to continue on with their community.
It's such a tiny group of people. If it were more equal then a split is fine, but it's only a very small group of kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow!!! Closing Lee. It makes sense since the other schools can absorb the kids but wow!
Don't get too excited. This is just conjecture by a random person posting on an anonymous forum.
Anonymous wrote:Rezone those Rolling Valley kids to Saratoga Elementary. Then they will be completely in the Lee pyramid. All of those Rolling Valley kids that attend Key and Lee are near Rolling and the Parkway so they are close to Saratoga.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lee is a low performing school. Aren't smaller schools and smaller class sizes a priority for underperforming schools?
Yes, however segregation seems to have a more negative effect than smaller class size and schools. At least that's what's come out of most of the reports. Ideally there is some of both. Integration and smaller class sizes.
Smaller class sizes and smaller school sizes are not the same thing. The former may allow for more personal attention and instruction; the latter tends to lead to fewer course options, weak PTSAs, and extra-curricular programs that struggle to get off the ground.
FCPS has neglected Lee for many years, aided and abetted by weak school board members who don't stick up for the school. They should not be moving any kids out of West Springfield to Lee at the present time. Period.
I've posted before about Lee. FCPS and Fairfax County are addressing Lee HS by the renovation and revitalization of the mall. It's a long term plan.
You do not know what you are talking about... and you keep talking about it. Do you live anywhere near Lee/Springfield/the mall? If you did, you would know that that area has nothing to do with "revitalizing" Lee. Nothing. The mall is fine. But, it ain't gonna improve Lee.
Yes, I do live in the area and yes, home prices have gone up.
Anonymous wrote:Not all of Hunt valley went to Lee. Just the area across the parkway. I’m curious about this because hunt valley is pretty full and it seems like they would want to address that. But then it would probably involve newington forest and south county.
Anonymous wrote:Wow!!! Closing Lee. It makes sense since the other schools can absorb the kids but wow!