Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone with a triple-digit IQ and the ability to read knows the Wolff book is true.

Do you mean some aspects ring true and confirm individual’s biases? Is this what you mean? And you must mean very low triple digit IQ: the author’s own note - in the beginning of the book - claims he presents conflicting representations and printed accounts of people he trusted more.

This man trusted BANNON — a man who lead a revolution and slit his own wrist during the power grab of governing. Honestly, thisfact alone shocked me bc I have NEVER even read about a strategist doing this previously in history. Learning about it in real time is fascinating palace intrique but, gossip.

Precisely. I'm embarrassed for the liberals who are salivating over what amounts to no more than gossip. The author himself says it's for the reader to decide what's true. So essentially, he's written a novel.

Exactly.

Not exactly. The author said that there were places where there were differing accounts and he provided both to let the reader decide.

Trumpers having a really difficult time with this distinction. They also keep tipping their hand; I don't think there's a Democrat who's reading this book and not taking a jaundiced eye toward it all, using critical thinking, looking for themes.

But I sense that Trumpers, like their dear leader, don't have a lot of experience with books, non-fiction or otherwise.

Funny.... nonfiction is most of what I read. And, I am a Trump supporter.
I can assure you that Wolff’s book is fiction. Possibly in the fantasy realm.

And you haven’t noticed that half of what Trump says is fiction?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone with a triple-digit IQ and the ability to read knows the Wolff book is true.

Do you mean some aspects ring true and confirm individual’s biases? Is this what you mean? And you must mean very low triple digit IQ: the author’s own note - in the beginning of the book - claims he presents conflicting representations and printed accounts of people he trusted more.

This man trusted BANNON — a man who lead a revolution and slit his own wrist during the power grab of governing. Honestly, thisfact alone shocked me bc I have NEVER even read about a strategist doing this previously in history. Learning about it in real time is fascinating palace intrique but, gossip.

Precisely. I'm embarrassed for the liberals who are salivating over what amounts to no more than gossip. The author himself says it's for the reader to decide what's true. So essentially, he's written a novel.

Exactly.

Not exactly. The author said that there were places where there were differing accounts and he provided both to let the reader decide.

Trumpers having a really difficult time with this distinction. They also keep tipping their hand; I don't think there's a Democrat who's reading this book and not taking a jaundiced eye toward it all, using critical thinking, looking for themes.

But I sense that Trumpers, like their dear leader, don't have a lot of experience with books, non-fiction or otherwise.

Funny.... nonfiction is most of what I read. And, I am a Trump supporter.
I can assure you that Wolff’s book is fiction. Possibly in the fantasy realm.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone with a triple-digit IQ and the ability to read knows the Wolff book is true.

Do you mean some aspects ring true and confirm individual’s biases? Is this what you mean? And you must mean very low triple digit IQ: the author’s own note - in the beginning of the book - claims he presents conflicting representations and printed accounts of people he trusted more.

This man trusted BANNON — a man who lead a revolution and slit his own wrist during the power grab of governing. Honestly, thisfact alone shocked me bc I have NEVER even read about a strategist doing this previously in history. Learning about it in real time is fascinating palace intrique but, gossip.

Precisely. I'm embarrassed for the liberals who are salivating over what amounts to no more than gossip. The author himself says it's for the reader to decide what's true. So essentially, he's written a novel.

Exactly.

Not exactly. The author said that there were places where there were differing accounts and he provided both to let the reader decide.

Trumpers having a really difficult time with this distinction. They also keep tipping their hand; I don't think there's a Democrat who's reading this book and not taking a jaundiced eye toward it all, using critical thinking, looking for themes.

But I sense that Trumpers, like their dear leader, don't have a lot of experience with books, non-fiction or otherwise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone with a triple-digit IQ and the ability to read knows the Wolff book is true.

Do you mean some aspects ring true and confirm individual’s biases? Is this what you mean? And you must mean very low triple digit IQ: the author’s own note - in the beginning of the book - claims he presents conflicting representations and printed accounts of people he trusted more.

This man trusted BANNON — a man who lead a revolution and slit his own wrist during the power grab of governing. Honestly, thisfact alone shocked me bc I have NEVER even read about a strategist doing this previously in history. Learning about it in real time is fascinating palace intrique but, gossip.

Precisely. I'm embarrassed for the liberals who are salivating over what amounts to no more than gossip. The author himself says it's for the reader to decide what's true. So essentially, he's written a novel.

Exactly.

Not exactly. The author said that there were places where there were differing accounts and he provided both to let the reader decide.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone with a triple-digit IQ and the ability to read knows the Wolff book is true.

Do you mean some aspects ring true and confirm individual’s biases? Is this what you mean? And you must mean very low triple digit IQ: the author’s own note - in the beginning of the book - claims he presents conflicting representations and printed accounts of people he trusted more.

This man trusted BANNON — a man who lead a revolution and slit his own wrist during the power grab of governing. Honestly, thisfact alone shocked me bc I have NEVER even read about a strategist doing this previously in history. Learning about it in real time is fascinating palace intrique but, gossip.

Precisely. I'm embarrassed for the liberals who are salivating over what amounts to no more than gossip. The author himself says it's for the reader to decide what's true. So essentially, he's written a novel.

Exactly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone with a triple-digit IQ and the ability to read knows the Wolff book is true.

Do you mean some aspects ring true and confirm individual’s biases? Is this what you mean? And you must mean very low triple digit IQ: the author’s own note - in the beginning of the book - claims he presents conflicting representations and printed accounts of people he trusted more.

This man trusted BANNON — a man who lead a revolution and slit his own wrist during the power grab of governing. Honestly, thisfact alone shocked me bc I have NEVER even read about a strategist doing this previously in history. Learning about it in real time is fascinating palace intrique but, gossip.

Precisely. I'm embarrassed for the liberals who are salivating over what amounts to no more than gossip. The author himself says it's for the reader to decide what's true. So essentially, he's written a novel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TL;DR Trump is ignorant, borderline illiterate and throws tantrums when he doesn’t get his way.

https://www.axios.com/the-wolff-lines-on-trump-that-ring-unambiguously-true-2522675021.html

And yet ... yet ... he beat The Harvey-Enabling Grifter. Millions will die!

Would love to go on, but I need to get back to looking lovingly at my 401(k) statement.

Elitist.

signed -- the other half of America that owns no stocks and doesn't GAF about the Dow.

The half of American that doesn't pay federal income tax? There's a big overlap, you know.

And why don't they pay federal income tax?

DP.. because their wages are too low, because Rs are against a living wage, because Rs like cheap labor (ie, farmers and construction business owners who vote overwhelmingly Rs).

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/01/05/trumps-deportation-vow-spurs-california-farmers-into-action.html

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/17/labor-shortage-for-washington-state-farmers-highlights-immigration-issues.html

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-20/-i-need-more-mexicans-a-kansas-farmer-s-message-to-trump

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone with a triple-digit IQ and the ability to read knows the Wolff book is true.

Do you mean some aspects ring true and confirm individual’s biases? Is this what you mean? And you must mean very low triple digit IQ: the author’s own note - in the beginning of the book - claims he presents conflicting representations and printed accounts of people he trusted more.

This man trusted BANNON — a man who lead a revolution and slit his own wrist during the power grab of governing. Honestly, thisfact alone shocked me bc I have NEVER even read about a strategist doing this previously in history. Learning about it in real time is fascinating palace intrique but, gossip.

Precisely. I'm embarrassed for the liberals who are salivating over what amounts to no more than gossip. The author himself says it's for the reader to decide what's true. So essentially, he's written a novel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone with a triple-digit IQ and the ability to read knows the Wolff book is true.

Do you mean some aspects ring true and confirm individual’s biases? Is this what you mean? And you must mean very low triple digit IQ: the author’s own note - in the beginning of the book - claims he presents conflicting representations and printed accounts of people he trusted more.

This man trusted BANNON — a man who lead a revolution and slit his own wrist during the power grab of governing. Honestly, thisfact alone shocked me bc I have NEVER even read about a strategist doing this previously in history. Learning about it in real time is fascinating palace intrique but, gossip.

Precisely. I'm embarrassed for the liberals who are salivating over what amounts to no more than gossip. The author himself says it's for the reader to decide what's true. So essentially, he's written a novel.

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine that Henry Holt publisher legal group did not vet every word in this book and listened to the tapes. Now, it is possible some people lied to Wolff, but he still had tapes with them talking about t-rump.

Anonymous wrote:Washington is a small town, and the fact that DJT is unfit and that he is being led around by legions of incompetents is an open secret here. If you are part of the political class here, you know that much of what Wolff wrote is not new at all.