Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ladies, been following the news lately? No man wants to be the next headline. We are walking on eggshells. I'm thinking of storing a blank contract on my phone that I get signed before doing anything. Mood killer but at least I won't have to sweat if I did or said the wrong thing.

Smart. Women have ruined good things with good men by accusing every man of being a rapist. If I were a man, I would just wave one big goodbye to urban American women.

Part of the reason foreign women are so much more desirable. American women and their definition of "sexual assault" have made them a laughing stock.

Anonymous wrote:Ladies, been following the news lately? No man wants to be the next headline. We are walking on eggshells. I'm thinking of storing a blank contract on my phone that I get signed before doing anything. Mood killer but at least I won't have to sweat if I did or said the wrong thing.

Smart. Women have ruined good things with good men by accusing every man of being a rapist. If I were a man, I would just wave one big goodbye to urban American women.

Ladies, been following the news lately? No man wants to be the next headline. We are walking on eggshells. I'm thinking of storing a blank contract on my phone that I get signed before doing anything. Mood killer but at least I won't have to sweat if I did or said the wrong thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?

Being a gentleman isn’t indifferent per se, it’s just not begging for it like you’re desperate.

He waits for her to invite him in. That has nothing to do with "being a gentleman" it just means he is passive: that is generally NOT a positive attribute especially for a male.
Conversely, if he (actively) invited himself in, that's not "begging for it" or "desperate".

Passive? You're nuts.

No he is right. The passive man is not generally seen in a positive light, especially by women no matter what they say. The passive man is friend zoned the more assertive man gets laid. Simply the way it is.

You sound like you've reading too much Red Pill stuff.

You saying PP is wrong? You think a guy who waits to be invited in gets laid more than a guy who makes it clear he's interested in sex and expects to be invited in? I think you are just bothered by the fact it is totally true. Why is that?

Well said. It is just plain stupidity to think a passive man gets laid more than a man who makes his interest clear. After all, every great "romance" novel or movie centers around the nice guy too timid to make a move. Apparently, 'red pill" poster hasnt noticed most of these characters tend to be decisive and bold types. Study after study shows women respond and find assert and dominate far more sexually appealing than passive or even nice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?

Being a gentleman isn’t indifferent per se, it’s just not begging for it like you’re desperate.

He waits for her to invite him in. That has nothing to do with "being a gentleman" it just means he is passive: that is generally NOT a positive attribute especially for a male.
Conversely, if he (actively) invited himself in, that's not "begging for it" or "desperate".

Passive? You're nuts.

No he is right. The passive man is not generally seen in a positive light, especially by women no matter what they say. The passive man is friend zoned the more assertive man gets laid. Simply the way it is.

You sound like you've reading too much Red Pill stuff.

No but you sound like a guy who probably should. You are ABSOLUTELY dumb if you think being passive is more successful with women than being assertive. The extreme side example is easy to see "nice guy" zero women, friend zoned constantly, a-hole never short on women. You know its not an accident so many women complain men are a-holes and jerks.....they tend to respond to that more than reeling in a passive nice guy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?

Being a gentleman isn’t indifferent per se, it’s just not begging for it like you’re desperate.

He waits for her to invite him in. That has nothing to do with "being a gentleman" it just means he is passive: that is generally NOT a positive attribute especially for a male.
Conversely, if he (actively) invited himself in, that's not "begging for it" or "desperate".

Passive? You're nuts.

No he is right. The passive man is not generally seen in a positive light, especially by women no matter what they say. The passive man is friend zoned the more assertive man gets laid. Simply the way it is.

You sound like you've reading too much Red Pill stuff.

You saying PP is wrong? You think a guy who waits to be invited in gets laid more than a guy who makes it clear he's interested in sex and expects to be invited in? I think you are just bothered by the fact it is totally true. Why is that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?

Being a gentleman isn’t indifferent per se, it’s just not begging for it like you’re desperate.

He waits for her to invite him in. That has nothing to do with "being a gentleman" it just means he is passive: that is generally NOT a positive attribute especially for a male.
Conversely, if he (actively) invited himself in, that's not "begging for it" or "desperate".

Passive? You're nuts.

No he is right. The passive man is not generally seen in a positive light, especially by women no matter what they say. The passive man is friend zoned the more assertive man gets laid. Simply the way it is.

You sound like you've reading too much Red Pill stuff.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think a guy who is indifferent to sex is "better" than a guy who consistently wants it?

Being a gentleman isn’t indifferent per se, it’s just not begging for it like you’re desperate.

He waits for her to invite him in. That has nothing to do with "being a gentleman" it just means he is passive: that is generally NOT a positive attribute especially for a male.
Conversely, if he (actively) invited himself in, that's not "begging for it" or "desperate".

Passive? You're nuts.

No he is right. The passive man is not generally seen in a positive light, especially by women no matter what they say. The passive man is friend zoned the more assertive man gets laid. Simply the way it is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Online porn has made it MUCH easier for men to go without sex. It's easier now to play it cool with a girlfriend when you know that everything fantasy imaginable is available online. I think men were pushier about sex a generation ago basically due to desperation.

That's the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

It *is* dumb, but how the hell have you avoided hearing about the insane jibbering our president is vomiting all over Twitter? I want to live in your world, PP.

Why is it that someone always try to bring politics into everything.

He's got a side piece.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Online porn has made it MUCH easier for men to go without sex. It's easier now to play it cool with a girlfriend when you know that everything fantasy imaginable is available online. I think men were pushier about sex a generation ago basically due to desperation.

That's the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

Why do you think it's dumb?

OP, he sounds like my last BF. In fact, based on timing, it might even be him. Save yourself and tell E to take a hike.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Online porn has made it MUCH easier for men to go without sex. It's easier now to play it cool with a girlfriend when you know that everything fantasy imaginable is available online. I think men were pushier about sex a generation ago basically due to desperation.

That's the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

It *is* dumb, but how the hell have you avoided hearing about the insane jibbering our president is vomiting all over Twitter? I want to live in your world, PP.

Because with men being accused left and right, he's being careful. You are inviting him up.. He's not forcing his way in.

Anonymous wrote:

HoCo333 wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Online porn has made it MUCH easier for men to go without sex. It's easier now to play it cool with a girlfriend when you know that everything fantasy imaginable is available online. I think men were pushier about sex a generation ago basically due to desperation.

*

Yuck, if a guy can get more satisfaction from watching a computer screen than from being in bed with a woman then he has a problem. But whatever makes you guys happy!

I think some women can get what they want from a wand.

I think some men can get what they want online.

To each their own.