Anonymous wrote:Retain an attorney to approach HR seeking to overturn this. Threaten legal action if you must. Be sure the attorney doesn't identify you, saying that the client does not want to face retaliation for this effort.
Meanwhile, announce publicly and loudly that you are going to redistribute your bonus once you get the tax implications worked out. Then wait and see if the bonus gets overturned.
If overturned, then you get out of it without paying a dime, AND you get the good karma that you WOULD have redistributed the bonus. You could even give an "on the spot" gift card to Starbucks or someplace to lock in that karma.
Since you are an anonymous complainant to HR, you could even publicly eviscerate HR for stepping in and being Scrooge.
If HR says the bonus redistribution is fine, then OK, redistribute. But hold back a decent chunk and blame it on the accountant saying you'd be double-taxed or something given your personal situation. You can't get away with not paying at all, but if you handle this right you can minimize the damage.
Anonymous wrote:
I don't find this sexist, but very wrong.
You reward the employee for their work... if they are a high performer, they should get compensated appropriately. Not based on what other financial factors they have.
What if they were independently wealthy? Does that mean that they should work for free?
What if it were you? No bonus because you had money... but others get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would check with HR on this. Basically this lead is paying people an extra bonus out of her pocket on top of what the company is paying. That’s not ok.
This. Is what she’s doing even allowed?
Yeah this seems questionable. I'd check with HR.
Anonymous wrote:OP - how about you give people $500 each, so at least they're getting something extra.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here. Our VP was in the room when the first leader said he's splitting his. He literally went "I'm cashing this baby today and bringing everyone 1/4th of it tomorrow". Vp didn't say anything other than "congrats to all, you all are hard workers and deserving" etc etc. This isn't a super high amount btw. Leader bonus is under 5k and teammate bonus is under 1k.
Didn't you initially say leader D was a woman, and this was her "fun job"?
It doesn't really matter, right?
....so this entire scenario is a lie that you made up?
Either she is a woman with a rich spouse and this is her fun job, OR
he is a man and in the meeting he said "I'm cashing this baby today and bringing everyone 1/4th of it tomorrow."
Those are two very distinct (and detailed) scenarios, so all I can conclude is that this is an entirely fictitious hypothetical that you've completely made up for...some reason. Either way, makes sense why you're brushing off everyone who says to talk to the boss / HR
I do not see how the gender makes a difference. The scenario is clearly a combination of both of the ones you posted above.
Team Leader D could be a man or a woman, but he/she has a rich spouse and so this is a "fun" job. He/she also said in a meeting "I'm cashing this baby today and bringing everyone 1/4th of it tomorrow."
I suspect what you're implying is that men are unlikely to be the ones with higher-paid spouses and "fun" jobs, in which case, pot, meet kettle.
Anonymous wrote:OP - how about you give people $500 each, so at least they're getting something extra.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here. Our VP was in the room when the first leader said he's splitting his. He literally went "I'm cashing this baby today and bringing everyone 1/4th of it tomorrow". Vp didn't say anything other than "congrats to all, you all are hard workers and deserving" etc etc. This isn't a super high amount btw. Leader bonus is under 5k and teammate bonus is under 1k.
Didn't you initially say leader D was a woman, and this was her "fun job"?