Anonymous wrote:She has adult children that she’s paying to “go to school”. She needs to cut that out. They’re adults.
Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
How can you put $18K times 2 ($36K) into your TSPs on a HHI of $100K
Different poster, but they've decided that saving that $36k is more important to them than spending it. And they probably have a modest home (rather than a mcmansion) because it better suits their priorities.
If you save $36K you have $74K left to pay for housing, taxes, medical insurance, food, bills, preschool, part-time nanny, , travel abroad and smartphones (according to OP's own description of their expenses). It just does not add up.
So after taxes what is going to be left is about $54k after taxes (assuming VA).
Taxes on 74k (tsp contributions are not taxed) will be less than $10k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
Your fortunate to have a healthy family, op. Appreciate your good fortune and stay off the internet about it (because you sound like a real asshat).
Anonymous wrote:DC col outside of the unhabitable ghetto areas of DC and pg, are at least double the national median.
The reason DC median appears low is because of the user uninhabitable areas listed above pulling the normal areas down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
How can you put $18K times 2 ($36K) into your TSPs on a HHI of $100K
Different poster, but they've decided that saving that $36k is more important to them than spending it. And they probably have a modest home (rather than a mcmansion) because it better suits their priorities.
If you save $36K you have $74K left to pay for housing, taxes, medical insurance, food, bills, preschool, part-time nanny, , travel abroad and smartphones (according to OP's own description of their expenses). It just does not add up.
So after taxes what is going to be left is about $54k after taxes (assuming VA).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
How can you put $18K times 2 ($36K) into your TSPs on a HHI of $100K
Different poster, but they've decided that saving that $36k is more important to them than spending it. And they probably have a modest home (rather than a mcmansion) because it better suits their priorities.
If you save $36K you have $74K left to pay for housing, taxes, medical insurance, food, bills, preschool, part-time nanny, , travel abroad and smartphones (according to OP's own description of their expenses). It just does not add up.
So after taxes what is going to be left is about $54k after taxes (assuming VA).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
Hey Op- this is inspiring; could you post your budget if you have time? We do have SN costs for one, which have cost about $8000 out of pocket in the last year, but that should go down to $5,000 a year for the next three.
Op here. We make 120. Our budget is not inspiring-we splurge and don't really bargain hunt. That's why I find these stories of 'not making it' on 100k Baffling. Please note I'm not at all recomending our budget, we 'splurge' a lot-groceries, health insurance, travel. but, anyway, here it is:
Roughly $6300/month
$1000-health insurance
$1000-nanny
$2800-rent+util +wifi+cell+parking (2 bed/2bath)
$500-grocery
$500-dining out/coffee
$500-shopping, gifts, travel etc.
Also, we only fund our tsp's at about 60% of the max allowed, sorry to confuse that earlier.
Outside of tsp we're not saving really much right now, but not tapping our substantial savings either.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
How can you put $18K times 2 ($36K) into your TSPs on a HHI of $100K
Different poster, but they've decided that saving that $36k is more important to them than spending it. And they probably have a modest home (rather than a mcmansion) because it better suits their priorities.
If you save $36K you have $74K left to pay for housing, taxes, medical insurance, food, bills, preschool, part-time nanny, , travel abroad and smartphones (according to OP's own description of their expenses). It just does not add up.
So after taxes what is going to be left is about $54k after taxes (assuming VA).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
Hey Op- this is inspiring; could you post your budget if you have time? We do have SN costs for one, which have cost about $8000 out of pocket in the last year, but that should go down to $5,000 a year for the next three.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
How can you put $18K times 2 ($36K) into your TSPs on a HHI of $100K
Different poster, but they've decided that saving that $36k is more important to them than spending it. And they probably have a modest home (rather than a mcmansion) because it better suits their priorities.
If you save $36K you have $74K left to pay for housing, taxes, medical insurance, food, bills, preschool, part-time nanny, , travel abroad and smartphones (according to OP's own description of their expenses). It just does not add up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NPR story on morning edition about family in gaithersburg who can't make it on $100k (struggle to pay utilities/say they can't afford christmas.) Link isn't up yet, sorry.
I don't get it. Yes they have two special needs kids, but that did not seem to be the bulk of their expenses when the reporter asked about it (and i understand state and county programs are pretty good in this area for funding special therapy/school.) She did describe some medical expenses leading to a bankruptcy.
We make not much more than 100K since both going part time to spend more time with our pre-schooler. we live (i think) pretty luxuriously: part time nanny, rent an apt with pool and concierge on metro line, trips abroad, mostly organic groceries, too many starbucks drinks, smartphones. we also have 6 figures in savings (admittedly from before we went part time) and fully fund our TSP's. i can think of so many areas where we could cut back if we had too-cheaper groceries, switching to domestic only trips, moving to a cheaper apartment. How could anyone not be making it on 100K? I'm genuinely confused. All i can think is they are mortgaged to the hilt and house poor.
Apparently this whole NPR series is about people not making it on 100K. i find it a little ridiculous and really insulting to families who are making it on so much less. What am i missing?
How can you put $18K times 2 ($36K) into your TSPs on a HHI of $100K
Different poster, but they've decided that saving that $36k is more important to them than spending it. And they probably have a modest home (rather than a mcmansion) because it better suits their priorities.
If you save $36K you have $74K left to pay for housing, taxes, medical insurance, food, bills, preschool, part-time nanny, , travel abroad and smartphones (according to OP's own description of their expenses). It just does not add up.