Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
and what exactly is a "typical neighborhood DCPS"? Many DCPS schools have very high engagement level. This just sounds like some pro-charter meme you pulled out of your ass.
Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
and what exactly is a "typical neighborhood DCPS"? Many DCPS schools have very high engagement level. This just sounds like some pro-charter meme you pulled out of your ass.
They're more engaged by the very effort it took to research and get into a charter, i.e., they're not sitting back and taking the path of least effort (the neighborhood DCPS).
That's not really a high bar. What - an internet connection? Lots of parents seek out OOB DCPS seats.
Think harder
Yes, if certain charters can keep out families without internet, I'm sure they would. (They definitely did create barriers like access to car and internet back in the pre-common lottery era.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
and what exactly is a "typical neighborhood DCPS"? Many DCPS schools have very high engagement level. This just sounds like some pro-charter meme you pulled out of your ass.
They're more engaged by the very effort it took to research and get into a charter, i.e., they're not sitting back and taking the path of least effort (the neighborhood DCPS).
That's not really a high bar. What - an internet connection? Lots of parents seek out OOB DCPS seats.
Think harder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
and what exactly is a "typical neighborhood DCPS"? Many DCPS schools have very high engagement level. This just sounds like some pro-charter meme you pulled out of your ass.
They're more engaged by the very effort it took to research and get into a charter, i.e., they're not sitting back and taking the path of least effort (the neighborhood DCPS).
That's not really a high bar. What - an internet connection? Lots of parents seek out OOB DCPS seats.
Think harder
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
and what exactly is a "typical neighborhood DCPS"? Many DCPS schools have very high engagement level. This just sounds like some pro-charter meme you pulled out of your ass.
They're more engaged by the very effort it took to research and get into a charter, i.e., they're not sitting back and taking the path of least effort (the neighborhood DCPS).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
and what exactly is a "typical neighborhood DCPS"? Many DCPS schools have very high engagement level. This just sounds like some pro-charter meme you pulled out of your ass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
It's hard to know whether some of these are deliberate. The fact that getting to some charter campuses without a car is practically impossible may be a screening device, but It may also be that real estate near public transit is just too pricy for newer charters.
The decision to have aftercare prices of $350+ per month per child, howver, is definitely sending a message.
Certain buzzwords in the mission statement (immersion, Montessori, progressive, expeditionary learning) tend to attract middle class parents. That may be moot though. Those schools are full, and most new charters coming online are just expansions of existing charters or national charter chains. There are no new LAMBs opening, because everyone has figured out that you can't meet the requirements (special ed, lcentral location) on the current budget. They can't compete with the economies of scale of the school district with just one campus.
Non title 1 DCPS schools have aftercare around $350+ too. $350 is not bad. Now $450-$550 is steep. Charters don’t get free facilities so can’t afford to subsidize aftercare.
Anonymous wrote:Charters can essentially pick their students through barriers to entry and subtle (and not-so-subtle) signals to parents who (consciously or not) choose to self-segregate.
Just the fact that they get more engaged families (who exercise choice) makes them stronger than your typical neighborhood DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We left an HRC for a Title I DCPS. The teachers are far more qualified, there is more structure and organization, and you have more recourse/supervision. For my kid with an IEP I have decided that I will never again do a charter. L
+1 For easier to hold DCPS accountable and get services your child is legally eligible to receive.
Anonymous wrote:We left an HRC for a Title I DCPS. The teachers are far more qualified, there is more structure and organization, and you have more recourse/supervision. For my kid with an IEP I have decided that I will never again do a charter. L
Anonymous wrote:Don't forget too that there are quite a few charters which are low performing and serve the same populations as the lower performing DCPS. We hear very little detail about those on this site.