Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because there are too many bleeding hearts in charge.
Not in DC, but close enough - in VA Jury cried over illegal immigrant woman's story and paid her fine themselves. This woman was a cleaning service employee and stole three rings including engagement ring from the client's house (white) and was given just a small fine as punishment that made her $5 richer. Because she is illegally in the country, pregnant and Mexican - all excuses lined up just right.
If she was white and a US citizen she would never vote - for example - for gun ownership rights again. That is today's liberal justice.

Bleeding hearts aren’t limited to liberals.
When I hear folks crying about the removal of Confederate statues and hear them whining about the “war against whites” and hear em wishing for a return to the good ol’ days when women and minorities and non-Christians “knew their place” that damn sure sounds like some bleeding hearts bullshit to me, only difference is that it’s emanating from a perspective on the opposite end of the subjective spectrum.

Anonymous wrote:
But it's up in formerly safe neighborhoods like Woodley Park. The predators are migrating.

Anonymous wrote:Because there are too many bleeding hearts in charge.
Not in DC, but close enough - in VA Jury cried over illegal immigrant woman's story and paid her fine themselves. This woman was a cleaning service employee and stole three rings including engagement ring from the client's house (white) and was given just a small fine as punishment that made her $5 richer. Because she is illegally in the country, pregnant and Mexican - all excuses lined up just right.
If she was white and a US citizen she would never vote - for example - for gun ownership rights again. That is today's liberal justice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no doubt a PC/race aspect, in fact a strong one. Democrats have been becoming very pro criminal, and they will do anything to lower instances of criminal acts committed by minorities. For example, if you look at the marijuana legalization done in DC, it was done in several steps. The only reason they decriminalized it wasn't because they were pro pot, it was because they were saying too many blacks were being arrested for pot offenses. When it was decrimalized, they decided to set the fine for it based upon what they felt blacks could afford. Then after that they legalized it, though you can only legally do it at home, and you can't buy it. I can smell people smoking pot all over columbia heights, and even downtown by metro center on occasion. very brazenly being done, because they know if there were arrests for it public, they'd say there's a racial disparity, and then they'd just make smoking pot in public legal so blacks don't bear the brunt of the arrests.

Who gives a sh#t? Seriously. Do you whine this much about people smoking cigarettes? If not, please shut up.

There's also the very real disparity: if you can afford to hire an attorney, you can escape any consequences for smoking marijuana. This is true pretty much EVERYWHERE in the United States. I see the legalization of pot as being helpful to POOR people, regardless of color. Rich folks have been beating drug charges for decades.

NP - what? Last time I checked, it's legal to smoke cigs outside in public. Weed, not so much. I don't much like my young kids inhaling powerful, skunky second-hand pot smoke when we're just going about our business.

Anybody like inhaling toxic carbon emissions?
If not shut up, no complaints cause it’s legal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no doubt a PC/race aspect, in fact a strong one. Democrats have been becoming very pro criminal, and they will do anything to lower instances of criminal acts committed by minorities. For example, if you look at the marijuana legalization done in DC, it was done in several steps. The only reason they decriminalized it wasn't because they were pro pot, it was because they were saying too many blacks were being arrested for pot offenses. When it was decrimalized, they decided to set the fine for it based upon what they felt blacks could afford. Then after that they legalized it, though you can only legally do it at home, and you can't buy it. I can smell people smoking pot all over columbia heights, and even downtown by metro center on occasion. very brazenly being done, because they know if there were arrests for it public, they'd say there's a racial disparity, and then they'd just make smoking pot in public legal so blacks don't bear the brunt of the arrests.

Who gives a sh#t? Seriously. Do you whine this much about people smoking cigarettes? If not, please shut up.

There's also the very real disparity: if you can afford to hire an attorney, you can escape any consequences for smoking marijuana. This is true pretty much EVERYWHERE in the United States. I see the legalization of pot as being helpful to POOR people, regardless of color. Rich folks have been beating drug charges for decades.

Anonymous wrote:There's no doubt a PC/race aspect, in fact a strong one. Democrats have been becoming very pro criminal, and they will do anything to lower instances of criminal acts committed by minorities. For example, if you look at the marijuana legalization done in DC, it was done in several steps. The only reason they decriminalized it wasn't because they were pro pot, it was because they were saying too many blacks were being arrested for pot offenses. When it was decrimalized, they decided to set the fine for it based upon what they felt blacks could afford. Then after that they legalized it, though you can only legally do it at home, and you can't buy it. I can smell people smoking pot all over columbia heights, and even downtown by metro center on occasion. very brazenly being done, because they know if there were arrests for it public, they'd say there's a racial disparity, and then they'd just make smoking pot in public legal so blacks don't bear the brunt of the arrests.

Anonymous wrote:There's no doubt a PC/race aspect, in fact a strong one. Democrats have been becoming very pro criminal, and they will do anything to lower instances of criminal acts committed by minorities. For example, if you look at the marijuana legalization done in DC, it was done in several steps. The only reason they decriminalized it wasn't because they were pro pot, it was because they were saying too many blacks were being arrested for pot offenses. When it was decrimalized, they decided to set the fine for it based upon what they felt blacks could afford. Then after that they legalized it, though you can only legally do it at home, and you can't buy it. I can smell people smoking pot all over columbia heights, and even downtown by metro center on occasion. very brazenly being done, because they know if there were arrests for it public, they'd say there's a racial disparity, and then they'd just make smoking pot in public legal so blacks don't bear the brunt of the arrests.

Anonymous wrote:There's no doubt a PC/race aspect, in fact a strong one. Democrats have been becoming very pro criminal, and they will do anything to lower instances of criminal acts committed by minorities. For example, if you look at the marijuana legalization done in DC, it was done in several steps. The only reason they decriminalized it wasn't because they were pro pot, it was because they were saying too many blacks were being arrested for pot offenses. When it was decrimalized, they decided to set the fine for it based upon what they felt blacks could afford. Then after that they legalized it, though you can only legally do it at home, and you can't buy it. I can smell people smoking pot all over columbia heights, and even downtown by metro center on occasion. very brazenly being done, because they know if there were arrests for it public, they'd say there's a racial disparity, and then they'd just make smoking pot in public legal so blacks don't bear the brunt of the arrests.

Anonymous wrote:Because the inmates are running the asylum......obviously.

Anonymous wrote:Laws aren't enforced, MPD has a "no chase policy," youth offenders aren't even given so much as a slap on the wrist...why is DC so soft on crime?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Violent crime in the nation’s capital has plunged dramatically throughout the year, as 2017 enters its final month. Violent crime is down 23 percent compared to this time last year, according to D.C. police crime data.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wtop.com/dc/2017/11/violent-crime-drops-dc-2017-nears-end/amp/

But it's up in formerly safe neighborhoods like Woodley Park. The predators are migrating.

They must be migrating out of the District altogether if it’s down 23 percent citywide.

The statistics are for crimes that are actually acknowledged. There are many more crimes committed that the police don't pursue or arrest. We are leaving DC because our once nice neighborhood is filled with petty BS that the cops shrug and say "hey, life in the big city."