Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP your 17 year old did not choose to have kids - you did. It's your job, not hers.
Also, this article has been making some rounds. You might find reading it helpful.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/10/when-kids-have-to-parent-their-siblings-it-affects-them-for-life/543975
Oh boo hiss. The mom isn't asking her to breastfeed.
Chores are chores and part of being a family.
Absolutely. Contribute to the household is one thing, but being a caretaker for others is something else - she didn't choose to have kids and should not be required to pick up after others. Pick up after herself? Absolutely. If you want her to take care of your kids, maybe you should pay her?
Do your kids only wash their own dinner plate after dinner?
How is this similar? I'm thinking something like - if someone cook/prep, the others clean. It's a tradeoff.
Are the younger siblings doing something that really helps the older sister, where there's a sort of even exchange of duties? If so, what? But being the oldest does not mean you have to provide free childcare. If you want her to take care of others, pay her - but she's not a free babysitter.
And I say that as the youngest child in a large family.
I am a middle child of five wo I do not have a beef with this.
BUT...
The younger kids were drug and carted all over God's green earth growing up to the older siblings' activities, plays, recitals, practices, games, etc etc. The older kids rarely if ever attend the younger siblings events or activities, if ever. If they are theboldest especially, they give the youngest siblings a fraction of the support that the younger siblings get back over the years growing up, even more so if there is more than a 2-4 year age difference.
This seems to hold true with every family I know that has more than two kids (like OPs family).
So the younger kids have given older sibling so much more than the older sibling gives to the younger ones. The teen years (helping to sit or drive, helping with homework, etc.) is a tiny way that teenage older siblings can give back to their younger siblings.
Anonymous wrote:Asking the 17 year old to drop off her younger siblings if it's on her way and does not interfere with getting to school on time is reasonable. I would consider this to be an age appropriate contribution to the household.
Asking the 17 year old to provide daily after school care is unreasonable. Once or twice a week is okay but not everyday. Doesn't she have after school activities/job/sports? Besides, you chose to have more children, she didn't. Older kids are not free built in baby sitters.
If OP has sons, hopefully she expects the same of them.[/quote]
Probably not. But I'm sure she whines about about carrying the emotional load and majority of the housework while contributing to the "why do woman have to do everything!" mantra.
Anonymous wrote:How is she supposed to get herself to school on time and take her little sisters to school?
Anonymous wrote: In the morning I have to go to work and she refuses to take her own sisters to school. Then after school she refuses to babysit them. I am appalled by this.
Anonymous wrote:Some of you people are ridiculous. No wonder you are raising such despicable, selfish, entitled teens. Part of being in a family is contributing. Asking a teen to drive a sibling to school in the morning is perfectly reasonable. Especially if you are paying for the car, gas, and insurance. The afternoons might not work some days because of after school activities. But there is no reason a teen should not be responsible for babysitting. I drove my sisters all over everywhere. Just part of living in a family. We are very, very close. I have five children and the older ones help out when needed. Families work together.
Anonymous wrote:Asking her to drive them to school, if it's close or on the way and you're paying for her car / gas, is fair. Expecting her to be your after school care provider is NOT. Absolutely not.
Anonymous wrote:Some of you people are ridiculous. No wonder you are raising such despicable, selfish, entitled teens. Part of being in a family is contributing. Asking a teen to drive a sibling to school in the morning is perfectly reasonable. Especially if you are paying for the car, gas, and insurance. The afternoons might not work some days because of after school activities. But there is no reason a teen should not be responsible for babysitting. I drove my sisters all over everywhere. Just part of living in a family. We are very, very close. I have five children and the older ones help out when needed. Families work together.
Anonymous wrote:I thought drivers under 18 couldn't have other children in the car?
Anonymous wrote:LOL. Take away her car! No access to car unless she can use car privleges to help her family. Take away her phone. No phone privleges unless she watches her family after school--that is a family communication tool, not her personal property.