Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Prestige" is so subjective. As an example in China, GW is thought of as being almost in the same category as an Ivy.
It is a good school but surely not a match for an Ivy....it is interesting to see how other countries look at our schools, the big H is still seen as the holy grail while many admit they heard of Princeton, go figure.
This is a huge exaggeration. Sure in China GW has a bigger reputation than you would expect but nowhere close to the ivies, Stanford.
Anonymous wrote:There is some correlation because 25% of the survey draws from peer assessment, of which 2/3 comes from college administrators and 1/3 comes from high school counselors.
But the actual ranking of prestige is different from the US News list: https://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/college-rankings-blog/2013/02/28/which-universities-are-ranked-highest-by-college-officials
As you can see, there are a lot of public schools in here which do poorly on the overall rank. US New's methodology inherently favors schools with a ton of money. Princeton ranks #1 because it has the highest endowment per student of any college in the country and therefore can make its class sizes small/faculty ratios low/etc. Public schools don't anywhere near the same financial resources for undergraduates.
Anonymous wrote:"Prestige" is so subjective. As an example in China, GW is thought of as being almost in the same category as an Ivy.
It is a good school but surely not a match for an Ivy....it is interesting to see how other countries look at our schools, the big H is still seen as the holy grail while many admit they heard of Princeton, go figure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1a. Harvard, Stanford, MIT
1b. Yale, Princeton
2. Columbia, Penn, Dartmouth
3a. Chicago, Duke, Brown, Cornell
1a. Harvard, Stanford, MIT
1b. Yale, Princeton
2a. Columbia, Penn, Chicago
2b. Dartmouth, Duke, Brown, Cornel
Fixed it for you. Dartmouth is a lower ivy along with Brown and Cornell. Columbia and Penn are kind of in the middle, definitely way above Dartmouth.
No, it's not. Chicago is also 50% larger, thus Dartmouth spaces are more prestigious. Chicago would be in the 10-13 range were it not for shameless rankings gaming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1a. Harvard, Stanford, MIT
1b. Yale, Princeton
2. Columbia, Penn, Dartmouth
3a. Chicago, Duke, Brown, Cornell
1a. Harvard, Stanford, MIT
1b. Yale, Princeton
2a. Columbia, Penn, Chicago
2b. Dartmouth, Duke, Brown, Cornel
Fixed it for you. Dartmouth is a lower ivy along with Brown and Cornell. Columbia and Penn are kind of in the middle, definitely way above Dartmouth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that the US News rankings does not always align itself with what most people would consider the top schools to be, based on general prestige. An example is that Berkeley and Emory are both tied at 21. I would bet that most of the population is a lot more familiar with Berkeley and that it carries a bigger wow factor among the general population than Emory. How much correlation do you think the rankings have with overall name recognition and prestige that the colleges carry with the overall population?
You had to dig all the way down to No. 21 before you could find an apparent disconnect?
No there were others, starting with Harvard being listed as #2, but I didn't think it was necessary to list each disconnect, I just listed the first one that popped into my mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that the US News rankings does not always align itself with what most people would consider the top schools to be, based on general prestige. An example is that Berkeley and Emory are both tied at 21. I would bet that most of the population is a lot more familiar with Berkeley and that it carries a bigger wow factor among the general population than Emory. How much correlation do you think the rankings have with overall name recognition and prestige that the colleges carry with the overall population?
You had to dig all the way down to No. 21 before you could find an apparent disconnect?
Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that the US News rankings does not always align itself with what most people would consider the top schools to be, based on general prestige. An example is that Berkeley and Emory are both tied at 21. I would bet that most of the population is a lot more familiar with Berkeley and that it carries a bigger wow factor among the general population than Emory. How much correlation do you think the rankings have with overall name recognition and prestige that the colleges carry with the overall population?
Anonymous wrote:The things white peoples worry about.![]()
Anonymous wrote:1a. Harvard, Stanford, MIT
1b. Yale, Princeton
2. Columbia, Penn, Dartmouth
3a. Chicago, Duke, Brown, Cornell
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1a. Harvard, Stanford, MIT
1b. Yale, Princeton
2. Columbia, Penn, Dartmouth
3a. Chicago, Duke, Brown, Cornell
Whoa, Dartmouth is in the same class as Columbia and Penn? Sure....
Clueless troll. People in the know recognize who goes to Dartmouth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1a. Harvard, Stanford, MIT
1b. Yale, Princeton
2. Columbia, Penn, Dartmouth
3a. Chicago, Duke, Brown, Cornell
Whoa, Dartmouth is in the same class as Columbia and Penn? Sure....
Clueless troll. People in the know recognize who goes to Dartmouth.