Anonymous wrote:So this was just about his actions after the war. Did this class start after the war? Did they talk about seizing his land and taking away his right to vote? What is it that you thought they should have put in the slides about his postwar years?
"I haven't been on DCUM in a while and after seeing these responses I don't plan to post again" Uggh. People have just gone off the deep end with their superiority complexes and anti Trump propaganda. It's so obvious that people who post statements like that have never had an in depth discussion about race before Trump. This discussion is very light. No one who has discussed race before would leave a discussion like this based on frustration.
Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't OP actually post what document was used to teach from and where the inaccuracy is.
Anonymous wrote:Yikes. That's disconcerting. Is this curriculum pushed down from Richmond? Bunch of racist rednecks down there so not too surprising.
I take that back. Sounds like there are redneck racists all over VA. WTF?!
If understanding historical facts makes you a "redneck racist", then I guess you are correct. You seem to want to change history to match your own personal point of view.
I seriously doubt that the information about Lee's opposition to slavery is presented in a vacuum.
Yikes. That's disconcerting. Is this curriculum pushed down from Richmond? Bunch of racist rednecks down there so not too surprising.
I take that back. Sounds like there are redneck racists all over VA. WTF?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it troubling that my child's 7th grade history class is being taught that Robert E Lee's legacy was that he opposed slavery -(even though he had slaves and fought against the union in the civil war)?
Yikes. That's disconcerting. Is this curriculum pushed down from Richmond? Bunch of racist rednecks down there so not too surprising.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it troubling that my child's 7th grade history class is being taught that Robert E Lee's legacy was that he opposed slavery -(even though he had slaves and fought against the union in the civil war)?
Anonymous wrote:I find it troubling that you seem opposed to the idea that people are nuanced.
Would you be troubled if they were taught that President Clinton's legacy includes support for women's rights?
Anonymous wrote:Prove slavery happened! Prove segregation happened! Prove red lining had an impact on the black family!
There is absolutely no one stating these things didn't happen or aren't happening now. You are projecting based on false accusations.