Anonymous wrote:In late Spring we accepted a full price, all cash offer from a buyer who started with a low ball offer. We had three offers that first week, two at full price. After the inspection, buyer requested 15% in lowered price. House located where market not as hot as immediate D.C. area, and in basically sound condition. Buyer walked when we said no to lower price. Lesson learned? We lost two other buyers, continued carrying empty house with summer maintenance required, and market slowed down mid-summer. Lesson learned? If a buyer is a pain in the neck initially, will continue to generate drama for the seller. It's not worth it. I will never accept a lowballer's offer again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Op here, I offered 4% off the asking price.
Just curious, if your final offer is 4% off the asking price (e.g. $28K below a $700K list price), then what in the world was your original offer? -4% is already pretty lowball for a final bid.
If the property doesn't have another bid, then the property is overpriced. A "lowball" offer than is accepted is the right price for that property. If it wasn't, someone would be paying more, amiright?
This is true in seller's markets. However, there are some neighborhoods where people are just not looking and you are waiting for buyers to consider the neighborhood. The OP said that this was not the DC area and outside of bigger housing markets, homes can sit for a while when buyers are not considering the neighborhood. Comps are the best indicator of the value of the home rather than trying to second guess the market.
No - it's true in all markets. Buyer(s), sellers, house, location, comps, time of year, interest rates, economy - they are all in constant motion. The price of a house is likely different in the spring than the fall, different on a busy street vs quiet, and so on. On that day, when a seller accepts a 'lowball' offer, that's the value of the house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Op here, I offered 4% off the asking price.
Just curious, if your final offer is 4% off the asking price (e.g. $28K below a $700K list price), then what in the world was your original offer? -4% is already pretty lowball for a final bid.
If the property doesn't have another bid, then the property is overpriced. A "lowball" offer than is accepted is the right price for that property. If it wasn't, someone would be paying more, amiright?
This is true in seller's markets. However, there are some neighborhoods where people are just not looking and you are waiting for buyers to consider the neighborhood. The OP said that this was not the DC area and outside of bigger housing markets, homes can sit for a while when buyers are not considering the neighborhood. Comps are the best indicator of the value of the home rather than trying to second guess the market.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Op here, I offered 4% off the asking price.
Just curious, if your final offer is 4% off the asking price (e.g. $28K below a $700K list price), then what in the world was your original offer? -4% is already pretty lowball for a final bid.
If the property doesn't have another bid, then the property is overpriced. A "lowball" offer than is accepted is the right price for that property. If it wasn't, someone would be paying more, amiright?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the only way to make it more enticing is to raise it.
I'd raise mine a little. You were dumb to offer the highest you were willing to pay as an opening offer. Does no one understand the basics of bargaining any more?
Or what, the cartoonish version of meeting in the middle? Uh, I offered 750k on a 760k listing, and we settled on 755k? Win one for the realtors. That’s fake bargaining — kabuki theater.
Sure but that's the way it is done. You don't have to like it.
I doubt very much OP offered 10 grand lower on a 760 offering. If he did this thread wouldn't exist
Op here, I offered 4% off the asking price.
Just curious, if your final offer is 4% off the asking price (e.g. $28K below a $700K list price), then what in the world was your original offer? -4% is already pretty lowball for a final bid.
If the property doesn't have another bid, then the property is overpriced. A "lowball" offer than is accepted is the right price for that property. If it wasn't, someone would be paying more, amiright?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the only way to make it more enticing is to raise it.
I'd raise mine a little. You were dumb to offer the highest you were willing to pay as an opening offer. Does no one understand the basics of bargaining any more?
Or what, the cartoonish version of meeting in the middle? Uh, I offered 750k on a 760k listing, and we settled on 755k? Win one for the realtors. That’s fake bargaining — kabuki theater.
Sure but that's the way it is done. You don't have to like it.
I doubt very much OP offered 10 grand lower on a 760 offering. If he did this thread wouldn't exist
Op here, I offered 4% off the asking price.
Just curious, if your final offer is 4% off the asking price (e.g. $28K below a $700K list price), then what in the world was your original offer? -4% is already pretty lowball for a final bid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the only way to make it more enticing is to raise it.
I'd raise mine a little. You were dumb to offer the highest you were willing to pay as an opening offer. Does no one understand the basics of bargaining any more?
Or what, the cartoonish version of meeting in the middle? Uh, I offered 750k on a 760k listing, and we settled on 755k? Win one for the realtors. That’s fake bargaining — kabuki theater.
Sure but that's the way it is done. You don't have to like it.
I doubt very much OP offered 10 grand lower on a 760 offering. If he did this thread wouldn't exist
Op here, I offered 4% off the asking price.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the only way to make it more enticing is to raise it.
I'd raise mine a little. You were dumb to offer the highest you were willing to pay as an opening offer. Does no one understand the basics of bargaining any more?
Or what, the cartoonish version of meeting in the middle? Uh, I offered 750k on a 760k listing, and we settled on 755k? Win one for the realtors. That’s fake bargaining — kabuki theater.
Sure but that's the way it is done. You don't have to like it.
I doubt very much OP offered 10 grand lower on a 760 offering. If he did this thread wouldn't exist
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the only way to make it more enticing is to raise it.
I'd raise mine a little. You were dumb to offer the highest you were willing to pay as an opening offer. Does no one understand the basics of bargaining any more?
Or what, the cartoonish version of meeting in the middle? Uh, I offered 750k on a 760k listing, and we settled on 755k? Win one for the realtors. That’s fake bargaining — kabuki theater.