Anonymous wrote:Thomson has a lot of OOB siblings from before it was "cool" to live downtown. So it's impossible to get in even with proximity (which we had).
Don't forget the MD kids still going there. Since DCPS doesn't care about residency issues (check the MD plates in the am...) no one is getting into Thomson for years to come.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GGW should pull the article. The authors clearly have no understanding of the lottery, preferences, and feeders.
That stuff was extraneous, but the article still highlights important data re which schools are doing better than anticipated with at-risk kids.
While it may not be relevant to your school search, certainly both DCPS and charters should be looking at what these schools are doing and try to emulate it.
The fate of at-risk kids affects everyone with a child in the city. We should applaud those schools that are helping these kids succeed.
It is relevant to why people choose Two Rivers over L-T and why peopke leave L-T in upper grades. They want to basically call everyone a racist and anti-poor for the crime of wanting a good middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GGW should pull the article. The authors clearly have no understanding of the lottery, preferences, and feeders.
That stuff was extraneous, but the article still highlights important data re which schools are doing better than anticipated with at-risk kids.
While it may not be relevant to your school search, certainly both DCPS and charters should be looking at what these schools are doing and try to emulate it.
The fate of at-risk kids affects everyone with a child in the city. We should applaud those schools that are helping these kids succeed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GGW should pull the article. The authors clearly have no understanding of the lottery, preferences, and feeders.
That stuff was extraneous, but the article still highlights important data re which schools are doing better than anticipated with at-risk kids.
While it may not be relevant to your school search, certainly both DCPS and charters should be looking at what these schools are doing and try to emulate it.
The fate of at-risk kids affects everyone with a child in the city. We should applaud those schools that are helping these kids succeed.
Anonymous wrote:GGW should pull the article. The authors clearly have no understanding of the lottery, preferences, and feeders.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:@Anonymous at 11:09am
I hear you on test prep but I just googled Thomson and it is apparently an IB primary years school. (The only one in DC...?) Can't just be drill/kill all day I imagine?
Exactly, and they have Chinese and Spanish. So many of the downtown parents are driving their kids to white charters all over the city - with a great school right there. So...what does that say about these liberated downtown parents?
From what I have heard from "liberated families" is they don't want to put up with the behavioral problems (foul language, unpleasant home life that gets discussed, etc). There is also a fear that their child will get picked on or become a target of anger. I am reporting this but do not agree with these statements, just so we are clear. They don't want anything to interfere with their child's learning.
So there are no behavioral problems in schools with lots of white kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:@Anonymous at 11:09am
I hear you on test prep but I just googled Thomson and it is apparently an IB primary years school. (The only one in DC...?) Can't just be drill/kill all day I imagine?
Exactly, and they have Chinese and Spanish. So many of the downtown parents are driving their kids to white charters all over the city - with a great school right there. So...what does that say about these liberated downtown parents?
From what I have heard from "liberated families" is they don't want to put up with the behavioral problems (foul language, unpleasant home life that gets discussed, etc). There is also a fear that their child will get picked on or become a target of anger. I am reporting this but do not agree with these statements, just so we are clear. They don't want anything to interfere with their child's learning.
I'm another white family that lives within walking distance of Thomson (I have a 2nd grader) and couldn't get in. I tried. So the real story on Thomson is that it's a school doing a great job with at-risk kids, NOT that it is a school that white families won't consider. It is also a school with a very large immigrant population - both latinx and Chinese. As of 15-16, it was 50% Hispanic, 20% black, 20% Asian, and 10% other.
If you're walking distance, you're not IB? What is your IB?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:@Anonymous at 11:09am
I hear you on test prep but I just googled Thomson and it is apparently an IB primary years school. (The only one in DC...?) Can't just be drill/kill all day I imagine?
Exactly, and they have Chinese and Spanish. So many of the downtown parents are driving their kids to white charters all over the city - with a great school right there. So...what does that say about these liberated downtown parents?
From what I have heard from "liberated families" is they don't want to put up with the behavioral problems (foul language, unpleasant home life that gets discussed, etc). There is also a fear that their child will get picked on or become a target of anger. I am reporting this but do not agree with these statements, just so we are clear. They don't want anything to interfere with their child's learning.
So there are no behavioral problems in schools with lots of white kids?
This is offensive. We're at a Title I school and have not seen anything like this from students or parents. We're at a well-run Title I school where the principal whips kids in shape, and that may be the difference. But please do not generalize. As shocking as this may be to you, low-income parents also care about their children's education and well being.
Some, but nowhere near as many. It is not a social norm of awful behavior. And there are fewer behavior problems among the parents, like hitting their kids at school or threatening school staff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:@Anonymous at 11:09am
I hear you on test prep but I just googled Thomson and it is apparently an IB primary years school. (The only one in DC...?) Can't just be drill/kill all day I imagine?
Exactly, and they have Chinese and Spanish. So many of the downtown parents are driving their kids to white charters all over the city - with a great school right there. So...what does that say about these liberated downtown parents?
From what I have heard from "liberated families" is they don't want to put up with the behavioral problems (foul language, unpleasant home life that gets discussed, etc). There is also a fear that their child will get picked on or become a target of anger. I am reporting this but do not agree with these statements, just so we are clear. They don't want anything to interfere with their child's learning.
So there are no behavioral problems in schools with lots of white kids?
This is offensive. We're at a Title I school and have not seen anything like this from students or parents. We're at a well-run Title I school where the principal whips kids in shape, and that may be the difference. But please do not generalize. As shocking as this may be to you, low-income parents also care about their children's education and well being.
Some, but nowhere near as many. It is not a social norm of awful behavior. And there are fewer behavior problems among the parents, like hitting their kids at school or threatening school staff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:@Anonymous at 11:09am
I hear you on test prep but I just googled Thomson and it is apparently an IB primary years school. (The only one in DC...?) Can't just be drill/kill all day I imagine?
Exactly, and they have Chinese and Spanish. So many of the downtown parents are driving their kids to white charters all over the city - with a great school right there. So...what does that say about these liberated downtown parents?
From what I have heard from "liberated families" is they don't want to put up with the behavioral problems (foul language, unpleasant home life that gets discussed, etc). There is also a fear that their child will get picked on or become a target of anger. I am reporting this but do not agree with these statements, just so we are clear. They don't want anything to interfere with their child's learning.
So there are no behavioral problems in schools with lots of white kids?
Some, but nowhere near as many. It is not a social norm of awful behavior. And there are fewer behavior problems among the parents, like hitting their kids at school or threatening school staff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:@Anonymous at 11:09am
I hear you on test prep but I just googled Thomson and it is apparently an IB primary years school. (The only one in DC...?) Can't just be drill/kill all day I imagine?
Exactly, and they have Chinese and Spanish. So many of the downtown parents are driving their kids to white charters all over the city - with a great school right there. So...what does that say about these liberated downtown parents?
From what I have heard from "liberated families" is they don't want to put up with the behavioral problems (foul language, unpleasant home life that gets discussed, etc). There is also a fear that their child will get picked on or become a target of anger. I am reporting this but do not agree with these statements, just so we are clear. They don't want anything to interfere with their child's learning.
So there are no behavioral problems in schools with lots of white kids?