Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

Anonymous wrote:Do you know who doesn't need a FISA warrant? A state AG.

Uh oh.

Please explain. Thanks

Do you know who doesn't need a FISA warrant? A state AG.

Uh oh.

Anonymous wrote:Mueller better shut down the leaks. I thought he was supposedly so good that he would run an airtight investigation.

Seems as if someone on board thinks it’s appropriate to talk to the press. Possibly one of the many Clinton donors on his team?

Good gracious, this is not hard to understand. Mueller is deliberately filtering this information for public consumption. His team knows SO MUCH more than this stuff we're reading tonight in "breaking news". It's a basic tactic - Mueller turned on the lights in this one area only to watch where these cock roaches will try to scurry off to next. In other words, your boys are shitting bricks tonight.

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Susan Rice lie under oath that she didn't unmask or the Trump lie of being wiretapped via Manafort in Trump Tower?

There is nothing Susan Rice did that was illegal or improper. Even the GOP on the House Intel Committee have stated that. You seem to be the only one banging the drum on her.

Manafort has been the subject of an investigation since at least 2014. He had a court order from the FISA court authorizing surveillance. Just because Trump was stupid enough to hire him, or whatever the circumstances, does't make it wrong.

And you know what? None of this would have happened if Trump and Manafort and Page were not knowing operatives for the Russian government. But f you going to collude against the people of the United States and get caught, then blaming anyone but yourself is a user strategy.

You know what else? This has all been discussed since August, BEFORE THE ELECTION, and yet the GOP still voted for the guy.

And you all want to blame Obama and Rice?

GTFO

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Susan Rice lie under oath that she didn't unmask or the Trump lie of being wiretapped via Manafort in Trump Tower?

When you got information on Clinton through illegal hacking, conservatives on this board said "who cares, is the information true?"

That one may come back to bite you in the ass.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

This

Remember how much blowback Trump got from the lame stream media when he said Obama wiretapped him? Sick!

No the FBI was carrying out a routine counterintelligence investigation. Just because you join a political campaign doesn't give you a free pass to run a criminal operation.

Why no "routine counterintelligence investigation" into the Clinton Foundation when she was hauling in hundreds of millions of dollars while SOS? Weird.

Exactly.

Maybe there was. Who knows. FISA warrants are like that.

The Russian troll bots are in full whataboutism/distract/but her emails mode on social media tonight.

That means the heat is on. Expect some distracting tweets by the crime boss himself tomorrow morning!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

This

Remember how much blowback Trump got from the lame stream media when he said Obama wiretapped him? Sick!

No the FBI was carrying out a routine counterintelligence investigation. Just because you join a political campaign doesn't give you a free pass to run a criminal operation.

Why no "routine counterintelligence investigation" into the Clinton Foundation when she was hauling in hundreds of millions of dollars while SOS? Weird.

Because it's a charity, and their donations are not secret?

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

So I guess criminals should just get a free pass if they are Republicans. Great logic!

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Susan Rice lie under oath that she didn't unmask or the Trump lie of being wiretapped via Manafort in Trump Tower?

I told you in the other thread that no one in the White House unmasks anyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

This

Remember how much blowback Trump got from the lame stream media when he said Obama wiretapped him? Sick!

It started in 2014. Read the article. trump was a fool for hiring someone who was a known foreign operative, who was known to anyone who reads, that he was laundering foreign money and doing nefarious deeds abroad.

I don't think Trump chose to hire Manafort. I think Manafort and his services were a gift from his Russian benefactors.

Which is worse - the Susan Rice lie under oath that she didn't unmask or the Trump lie of being wiretapped via Manafort in Trump Tower?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

This

Remember how much blowback Trump got from the lame stream media when he said Obama wiretapped him? Sick!

No the FBI was carrying out a routine counterintelligence investigation. Just because you join a political campaign doesn't give you a free pass to run a criminal operation.

Why no "routine counterintelligence investigation" into the Clinton Foundation when she was hauling in hundreds of millions of dollars while SOS? Weird.

Shut. The. F*ck. Up. About hillary. No one cares. Stop the whataboutism. This is about the most corrupt administration in history.

These people are insane.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

This

Remember how much blowback Trump got from the lame stream media when he said Obama wiretapped him? Sick!

No the FBI was carrying out a routine counterintelligence investigation. Just because you join a political campaign doesn't give you a free pass to run a criminal operation.

Why no "routine counterintelligence investigation" into the Clinton Foundation when she was hauling in hundreds of millions of dollars while SOS? Weird.

Exactly.