Anonymous wrote:Um, what? Yale is ranked 3rd from 4th last year, Princeton has been 1 for the last 7 years.
The biggest movers in the top 30 are Harvey Mudd (went up by 9), NYU (went up by 6) and Haverford (went down by 6), but most schools are 0-2 positions of where they were last year.
Anonymous wrote:Wake Forest (#27) above Michigan (#28)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Predictions?
SMU big gains.
Northeastern continues to rise.
When I was in college in the Boston area in the late 1980s Northeastern was a fourth tier commuter school. It has gamed the system more transparently than any other school.
And still sucks.
Gamed the system, or offered a differentiated product that proved to be popular? Maybe it partly went up in the rankings because the graduates did well at what they were doing? I don't know much about northeastern, but I do know your answer was ridiculous.
BU was also a fourth rate school once.... bfd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to see if there will be any shake-ups in the top 20.
There never are.
Don't know if it qualifies as a shake up, but Yale has dropped out of the top 3 in a tie for 5th. Duke drops down a notch to #9.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Predictions?
SMU big gains.
Northeastern continues to rise.
When I was in college in the Boston area in the late 1980s Northeastern was a fourth tier commuter school. It has gamed the system more transparently than any other school.
And still sucks.
Gamed the system, or offered a differentiated product that proved to be popular? Maybe it partly went up in the rankings because the graduates did well at what they were doing? I don't know much about northeastern, but I do know your answer was ridiculous.
Still is.
BU was also a fourth rate school once.... bfd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Predictions?
SMU big gains.
Northeastern continues to rise.
When I was in college in the Boston area in the late 1980s Northeastern was a fourth tier commuter school. It has gamed the system more transparently than any other school.
And still sucks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to see if there will be any shake-ups in the top 20.
There never are.
Anonymous wrote:Wake Forest (#27) above Michigan (#28)?
Anonymous wrote:Wake Forest (#27) above Michigan (#28)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:William and Mary drops a lot.
Maybe I'm judging solely by the caliber of kids going from NOVA, but that's hard to imagine. No connection to WM, but I 't see it.
Anonymous wrote:Actually, UChicago vs Yale is 24:76.
Parchment is a good tool to see how schools do cross-admit wise. It's especially accurate when you look at schools in the same tier (so UChicago vs Yale would be representative, where as UChicago vs Penn State might not).
http://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=University+of+Chicago&with=Yale+University
This tool says a lot. HYPSM win against pretty much everyone else. However, Williams does not win so readily against other LACs- more go to Swarthmore and Pomona. In essence, HYPMS are really in a tier of their own, but Williams and Amherst aren't so much higher than other top LACs.