Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Capacity_Utilization_FallProjections17-26_Final_Web.pdf
At least one school is already severely off the projections, so don't look at these as having any reflection on actual reality. Despite being provided numbers to the contrary, APS stuck with their 757 projection for McKinley. Final numbers don't come in until 30 September but it looks to be over 800.
I think Colin Brown staid 790 at back to school night earlier this week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Capacity_Utilization_FallProjections17-26_Final_Web.pdf
At least one school is already severely off the projections, so don't look at these as having any reflection on actual reality. Despite being provided numbers to the contrary, APS stuck with their 757 projection for McKinley. Final numbers don't come in until 30 September but it looks to be over 800.
I think Colin Brown staid 790 at back to school night earlier this week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Capacity_Utilization_FallProjections17-26_Final_Web.pdf
At least one school is already severely off the projections, so don't look at these as having any reflection on actual reality. Despite being provided numbers to the contrary, APS stuck with their 757 projection for McKinley. Final numbers don't come in until 30 September but it looks to be over 800.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And then you have schools like Carlin Springs, Randolph and Barcroft that are not over crowded because half of the families that are not in low income high rises send their kids to choice schools to avoid low performing schools!
If the boundaries were seriously redrawn so that those schools were not so hopelessly lower performing spots would open up at the choice schools. Then parents from seriously overcrowded schools (and are overcrowded because they are high performing) could have slots into the choice schools.
That would relieve some over crowding.
Sure, but my child will not be leaving their choice school to attend their GS 3 neighborhood school, so that the dumplings of North Arlington can have more space.
Anonymous wrote:There are two different HB's being talked about here: HB Woodlawn, grades 6-12, being moved to Roslyn into a new building, and Hoffman-Boston, an ES Pre-K-5, in south Arlington that has changed dramatically over the last few years (SOL scores way up, but not sure whether that tracks demographic changes or something extraordinary happening at the school, or both). I shortened Hoffman-Boston's name upthread to "HB" just so I wouldn't have to type it out, but I was not referring to the program that is being moved to Rosslyn. Both are smaller schools, but one is smaller by design (HB Woodlawn) and one just happens to have a lower enrollment than surrounding elementary schools (Hoffman-Boston), and may have a lower capacity because it's an older building.
Anonymous wrote:And then you have schools like Carlin Springs, Randolph and Barcroft that are not over crowded because half of the families that are not in low income high rises send their kids to choice schools to avoid low performing schools!
If the boundaries were seriously redrawn so that those schools were not so hopelessly lower performing spots would open up at the choice schools. Then parents from seriously overcrowded schools (and are overcrowded because they are high performing) could have slots into the choice schools.
That would relieve some over crowding.
Anonymous wrote:The HB kids are comfy - that is all that matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hoffman Boston is a GS 8.
Oakridge is a GS 8.
Be HB is inferior. Ok.
It's Drew that they would be reassigned to, not HB.
Anonymous wrote:Hoffman Boston is a GS 8.
Oakridge is a GS 8.
Be HB is inferior. Ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard Oakridge was chaos yesterday- 8 kindergarten classes. Henry will move to the new school but probably will still be over capacity- the surrounding neighborhoods are filled with toddlers who will in K in 2020 at the new school.
There are 6 kindergarten classes at Oakridge. (And two pre-K.) It may be in chaos frequently, but not for that reason.
![]()
Is there any room to physically expand the Oakridge campus? Or is it geographically constrained?
With 800+ kids, I seriously hope it won't be expanded further. They just took out part of a playground to add to the trailers.![]()