Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This always makes me secretly glad for my middle of the pack January month kid.
Yeah, uh, that kid will be one of the oldest.
No, I think middle??
Yes I have an summer young one who I sent on time and I hated hearing that red shirted kids would be over a year older. With my Jan bday kid I have less of a reaction hearing about redshirted kids bc it's only 6 months older.
Re: sports, it's interesting. I read the chapter about this in one of Malcolm Gladwell's books. But at the same time, I see that the kids who are REALLY good are better than kids multiple years older than them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If schools don't want parents to redshirt, they need to tone down the early elementary years. Otherwise, we will continue to have kids who turn 7 in kindergarten.
"Schools" are doing this because the privatization movement (supported by both parties) has convinced the general public that the raving inequalities in our schools aren't due to poverty (which they are), but due to poor teaching. Until the public wisens up and starts working to reduce inequalities--which begin long before the first day of preschool--nothing's going to get better. Go read a Diane Ravitch book if you're honestly interested in learning more.
Diane Ravitch...what is this, 1987?
Definitely an example of a stupid American proud to wallow in ignorance. She's the forefront of the anti-privatization movement in the US, and her text Reign of Error continues to be the top text in federal education legislation on Amazon, 3 years and 414 reviews later with a 4.7 average.
That book is the gold standard for destroying every BS argument for charter schools and privatization ever created. The PP is definitely a fool, and doubtless someone who sees herself as "educated" on the issues despite eating all the anti-public school garbage she's been fed over the last decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This always makes me secretly glad for my middle of the pack January month kid.
Yeah, uh, that kid will be one of the oldest.
No, I think middle??
Yes I have an summer young one who I sent on time and I hated hearing that red shirted kids would be over a year older. With my Jan bday kid I have less of a reaction hearing about redshirted kids bc it's only 6 months older.
Re: sports, it's interesting. I read the chapter about this in one of Malcolm Gladwell's books. But at the same time, I see that the kids who are REALLY good are better than kids multiple years older than them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If schools don't want parents to redshirt, they need to tone down the early elementary years. Otherwise, we will continue to have kids who turn 7 in kindergarten.
"Schools" are doing this because the privatization movement (supported by both parties) has convinced the general public that the raving inequalities in our schools aren't due to poverty (which they are), but due to poor teaching. Until the public wisens up and starts working to reduce inequalities--which begin long before the first day of preschool--nothing's going to get better. Go read a Diane Ravitch book if you're honestly interested in learning more.
Diane Ravitch...what is this, 1987?
Definitely an example of a stupid American proud to wallow in ignorance. She's the forefront of the anti-privatization movement in the US, and her text Reign of Error continues to be the top text in federal education legislation on Amazon, 3 years and 414 reviews later with a 4.7 average.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This always makes me secretly glad for my middle of the pack January month kid.
Yeah, uh, that kid will be one of the oldest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If schools don't want parents to redshirt, they need to tone down the early elementary years. Otherwise, we will continue to have kids who turn 7 in kindergarten.
"Schools" are doing this because the privatization movement (supported by both parties) has convinced the general public that the raving inequalities in our schools aren't due to poverty (which they are), but due to poor teaching. Until the public wisens up and starts working to reduce inequalities--which begin long before the first day of preschool--nothing's going to get better. Go read a Diane Ravitch book if you're honestly interested in learning more.
Diane Ravitch...what is this, 1987?
Anonymous wrote:I know a few kids who repeated a preK or K year -- but I'm always surprised by red-shirting. Are families paying for an entire year more of daycare? I can't imagine any of the public school families I know having the resources to throw 15-20K at this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If schools don't want parents to redshirt, they need to tone down the early elementary years. Otherwise, we will continue to have kids who turn 7 in kindergarten.
"Schools" are doing this because the privatization movement (supported by both parties) has convinced the general public that the raving inequalities in our schools aren't due to poverty (which they are), but due to poor teaching. Until the public wisens up and starts working to reduce inequalities--which begin long before the first day of preschool--nothing's going to get better. Go read a Diane Ravitch book if you're honestly interested in learning more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know a few kids who repeated a preK or K year -- but I'm always surprised by red-shirting. Are families paying for an entire year more of daycare? I can't imagine any of the public school families I know having the resources to throw 15-20K at this.
All of us with kids born after the cut off automatically pay an extra year of daycare. Especially in this area, lots of people manage.
Anonymous wrote:If schools don't want parents to redshirt, they need to tone down the early elementary years. Otherwise, we will continue to have kids who turn 7 in kindergarten.
Anonymous wrote:I know a few kids who repeated a preK or K year -- but I'm always surprised by red-shirting. Are families paying for an entire year more of daycare? I can't imagine any of the public school families I know having the resources to throw 15-20K at this.