Anonymous wrote:It is interesting that while most posters agree that tattoos are hideous, they reject the idea that they may cause people to pre-judge the owner. Of course this is true if the tattoo is discrete and usually or always covered by clothing. But would your feelings be the same if you were interviewing a candidate and they had a visible face/neck/hand tattoo? It would certainly give me pause.
To the OP.....why would you cause potentially irreparable damage to your relationship with your son and diminish his future over a one-off incident? It seems spiteful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Using "me and DH" in the nominative case instead of "DH and I" is more underclass these days than a tattoo. And I loathe tattoos.
OP, so many worse things that he could have done. This too will pass.
I agree. It's like nails on a chalkboard, even reading it. But somewhat funny in this context.
Anonymous wrote:Total control freak mom. He's 19. Take a breath and move on. It could be worse. He could be working for Trump
Anonymous wrote:Lady you are off your rocker.
Also, your grammar offends me far more than any tattoo.
Anonymous wrote:Using "me and DH" in the nominative case instead of "DH and I" is more underclass these days than a tattoo. And I loathe tattoos.
OP, so many worse things that he could have done. This too will pass.
Anonymous wrote:Using "me and DH" in the nominative case instead of "DH and I" is more underclass these days than a tattoo. And I loathe tattoos.
OP, so many worse things that he could have done. This too will pass.
Anonymous wrote:Lady you are off your rocker.
Also, your grammar offends me far more than any tattoo.
Anonymous wrote:That is pretty extreme of you. Tell him it was a dumb decision and leave it alone. His tattoo is no reflection on his college performance. You are just throwing your authority around