Anonymous
Post 10/09/2018 15:37     Subject: Riverdale
Anyone else see a resemblance between Archie and Colin Farrell?

https://www.gofugyourself.com/photos/the-riverdale-cast-hits-the-promotional-circuit/celebrities-visit-build-series-10
Anonymous
Post 08/29/2018 16:18     Subject: Riverdale
Anonymous wrote:I think season 2 is ridiculous.


I agree, for me it was disappointing after enjoying season one.

I think that's what you are saying?
Anonymous
Post 08/29/2018 16:02     Subject: Re:Riverdale
Excited for season 3. Just read it is going to be a lot less dark. More high school and less murder. They are actually going to show the kids going to class, studying, LOL.

Can't wait!
Anonymous
Post 08/29/2018 13:19     Subject: Riverdale
I would say it depends on how mature the 12 year old is.
Anonymous
Post 08/29/2018 12:21     Subject: Riverdale
I don't think it's appropriate for 12 year olds. This season was pretty dark. Season 1, maybe.

But your 14 year old has probably already seen some episodes, whether you know it or not.
Anonymous
Post 08/29/2018 12:04     Subject: Re:Riverdale
Is this appropriate for 12 and 14 DCs?
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2018 09:26     Subject: Riverdale
Last night's episode was really strong--loved the 'core four' together. I do think this mob thing will get old though.
Anonymous
Post 02/20/2018 10:42     Subject: Re:Riverdale
Anonymous wrote:This is a really good show! I am surprised how much I like it.

Man, Molly Ringwald looks bad. It was hard for me to watch her.


I absolutely love the casting of all the parents. I'm amazed at how much Jughead and F.P. look alike.
Anonymous
Post 02/18/2018 18:23     Subject: Re:Riverdale
This is a really good show! I am surprised how much I like it.

Man, Molly Ringwald looks bad. It was hard for me to watch her.
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2018 15:17     Subject: Riverdale
I wish that tehy'd convert it to something like the Archie's Weird Mysteries cartoon
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2018 02:24     Subject: Riverdale
Anonymous wrote:I don't mind the Lodges being latino--I think the all while comic needs a little updating. I do find the casualness regarding teen sex rather odd. I guess growing up in the era of Dawson's Creek sets a standard but shouldn't Betty (the 16 year old good girl) sleeping with Jughead at least warrant a conversation?


I haven't met many white girls named veronica have you? I have met many latinas named Veronica
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2018 17:08     Subject: Riverdale
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I loved the first season of the show, but now it’s really gone off the deep end. There’s like two murders, an affair, and a blackmailing before the first commercial break.


It does seem like they are setting themselves up for a limited run. It's like what my writing teacher used to say, "you break it, you buy it." They include all these scenes for shock value without any real story purpose but then the writers are stuck in a world where all these ridiculous things have happened to no end...it's a definite way to lose viewers.


They spent a total of like 60 seconds of airtime on Betty and Jug having sex for the first time and then gave half of the episode to the killing of the random drug dealer. Poor decision making by the writers.


Even though I realize that they aren't trying to be a typical high school show, the fact that they glossed over the main couple's first times seems like a misstep. Ultimately, what will keep viewers coming back is their connections to the characters and the relationships, not the ridiculous, far fetched storylines.
Anonymous
Post 02/09/2018 14:47     Subject: Riverdale
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I loved the first season of the show, but now it’s really gone off the deep end. There’s like two murders, an affair, and a blackmailing before the first commercial break.


It does seem like they are setting themselves up for a limited run. It's like what my writing teacher used to say, "you break it, you buy it." They include all these scenes for shock value without any real story purpose but then the writers are stuck in a world where all these ridiculous things have happened to no end...it's a definite way to lose viewers.


They spent a total of like 60 seconds of airtime on Betty and Jug having sex for the first time and then gave half of the episode to the killing of the random drug dealer. Poor decision making by the writers.
Anonymous
Post 02/09/2018 13:47     Subject: Riverdale
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I loved the first season of the show, but now it’s really gone off the deep end. There’s like two murders, an affair, and a blackmailing before the first commercial break.


It does seem like they are setting themselves up for a limited run. It's like what my writing teacher used to say, "you break it, you buy it." They include all these scenes for shock value without any real story purpose but then the writers are stuck in a world where all these ridiculous things have happened to no end...it's a definite way to lose viewers.


+1. Well put.
Anonymous
Post 02/09/2018 13:18     Subject: Riverdale
Anonymous wrote:I loved the first season of the show, but now it’s really gone off the deep end. There’s like two murders, an affair, and a blackmailing before the first commercial break.


It does seem like they are setting themselves up for a limited run. It's like what my writing teacher used to say, "you break it, you buy it." They include all these scenes for shock value without any real story purpose but then the writers are stuck in a world where all these ridiculous things have happened to no end...it's a definite way to lose viewers.