Anonymous wrote:Yes, he's in a few from the pre-kid days. Usually we were taking a couple picture when we were dressed nicely so that's what made the profile picture. I have some alone too. Now it's normally me with one/both of my kids.
My only nit is people who put ONLY their kids or ONLY their spouse in the picture. The profile pic is supposed to be yours, so if you aren't in it, what's the point? But I also don't spend too much time analyzing it.
Anonymous wrote:I had to go look. I am typically of he sentiment that it's MY profile, so pics should be of me.
95 profile pics, and most are just me. However:
1 of me & DH at our wedding reception
6 of me & the baby
1 Warhol cat (pink pussy)
1 of me & the dog I used after I put him to sleep
2 drawings of me
1 stack of books
2 of me & ex-DH @ 18 & 22
1 of me and a girlfriend when she was PG
1 of me & my old cat
1 of me & a niece & nephew
2 of one of my cats
1 of me and the dean and my PhD advisor at graduation
1 of a cartoon character
1 of a cookie

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone's overthinking this. When ANYONE is with someone in their profile pic, it's just because the person liked that pic of herself and thought it'd be rude to crop it.
Girl I will crop anyone, anytime, even my kids and husband.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone's overthinking this. When ANYONE is with someone in their profile pic, it's just because the person liked that pic of herself and thought it'd be rude to crop it.
Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't a person post a profile photo together with their spouse? I mean, what's the issue?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. In fact, I am not even friends with my DH on Facebook - by our choice.
Well, that's just weird.