Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rule of thumb is 100 at 5'0 and 5 lbs for every inch after. So at 5'3 110-115 is going to be best probably. Obviously there's outliers, please nobody who is 123 and looks great come for me.

This is so dumb. That gives me 135 lbs to play with. At 170, I was a size 8, small 10, and looked great. If I lost weight, I looked ill.

There is absolutely no way you looked good at 5'3 and 170 pounds. Even if you are large boned. Just no way. Fwiw, a size 8 in vanity sizing would have been a size 14 twenty years ago. 170 at your height is extremely unhealthy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:130 and 5'3 isn't thin. The problem is that it's considered thin in the US bc we are a nation of fatties.

Wow

well, i hate to say it but it's true. US is a nation of fatties.

- np

And bitches, apparently.

Not really. One isn't being a bitxh by admitting most Americans are fat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:130 and 5'3 isn't thin. The problem is that it's considered thin in the US bc we are a nation of fatties.

Wow

well, i hate to say it but it's true. US is a nation of fatties.

- np

And bitches, apparently.

Anonymous wrote:Rule of thumb is 100 at 5'0 and 5 lbs for every inch after. So at 5'3 110-115 is going to be best probably. Obviously there's outliers, please nobody who is 123 and looks great come for me.

This is so dumb. That gives me 135 lbs to play with. At 170, I was a size 8, small 10, and looked great. If I lost weight, I looked ill.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:130 and 5'3 isn't thin. The problem is that it's considered thin in the US bc we are a nation of fatties.

Wow

well, i hate to say it but it's true. US is a nation of fatties.

- np

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even at 105 pounds, I was still larger than a four on bottom.

These women are all talking vanity sizes. Ann Taylor Loft 2-4. A 00 at AT literally falls off of me, it's insane. A 2 there is maybe a real 6.

We are talking about the sizes that are available to us at the stores we shop at. It's. It's not our fault many companies vanity size. That's why I only buy jeans by waistband size and length.

Anonymous wrote:Even at 105 pounds, I was still larger than a four on bottom.

Yes- all women are built differently.

Anonymous wrote:Even at 105 pounds, I was still larger than a four on bottom.

These women are all talking vanity sizes. Ann Taylor Loft 2-4. A 00 at AT literally falls off of me, it's insane. A 2 there is maybe a real 6.

OP, you also need to take age into account, not just height & weight.

Even at 105 pounds, I was still larger than a four on bottom.

Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'3 and waver between 115 and 120, but I'm an endurance athlete and have very low body fat and a lot of muscle. At this weight I wear a size 24 Jean and XXS in athleta (larger in tops because I have small implants).

I'm same height and size, but stuck between 105-110. You must be serious muscle. Jealous.

I think 120 is ideal ideal.

I am 5'2", and blubbery at 130. I need to be 115 to 120. That is a size 4.

In my twenties I was 120 and 19% body fat. I was lifting weights. It was a good look and weight.

Op you will feel great between 110-120

Anonymous wrote:130 and 5'3 isn't thin. The problem is that it's considered thin in the US bc we are a nation of fatties.

Wow