Anonymous wrote:Hardy has had a suspension problem.
Per the last equity report, 87 of 434 students were suspended 1 or more days (none were expelled) in one school year.
The suspended students were of ALL races and demographic groups (white, black, Asian and Latino).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
The point is Hardy will now have a principal with these skills, which is fantastic. And with an enrollment of under 500, I bet he'll actually be able to find the time to apply his mediation skills directly and also prepare his leadership team. Honestly, I'm very optimistic about the future of Hardy and everyone who loves to come onto this board to bitch and gripe about Hardy isn't going to grind me down.
Most principals --especially Hardy's -- are simply not going to have time to mediate conflicts between students. Now, maybe if he gets a VP who he feels comfortable delegating a lot of duties, OK, he could do it, but really principals spend most of their time on organizational management and not direct intervention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
The point is Hardy will now have a principal with these skills, which is fantastic. And with an enrollment of under 500, I bet he'll actually be able to find the time to apply his mediation skills directly and also prepare his leadership team. Honestly, I'm very optimistic about the future of Hardy and everyone who loves to come onto this board to bitch and gripe about Hardy isn't going to grind me down.
Most principals --especially Hardy's -- are simply not going to have time to mediate conflicts between students. Now, maybe if he gets a VP who he feels comfortable delegating a lot of duties, OK, he could do it, but really principals spend most of their time on organizational management and not direct intervention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
The point is Hardy will now have a principal with these skills, which is fantastic. And with an enrollment of under 500, I bet he'll actually be able to find the time to apply his mediation skills directly and also prepare his leadership team. Honestly, I'm very optimistic about the future of Hardy and everyone who loves to come onto this board to bitch and gripe about Hardy isn't going to grind me down.
Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
Anonymous wrote:The need for better, more responsive, more immediate and more trasnparent dealings with discipline was a big issue for parents at Hardy. And while I did not sit on the selection panel, I would bet they had at least one question for the candidates about their views on discipline. aWhile some seem to be reading the touting of fewer suspensions under Mr. Cooke as perhaps condoning or being too forgiving of poor or disruptive behavior, I actually think his experience means he's going to show up at Hardy having more tools and effective processes to apply to discipline problems. I personally think DCPS choosing to highlight this "acheivement" in Mr. Cooke's bio statement is tone deaf and not understanding what Hardy parents (particularly feeder school families) need or want to hear. But that's not Mr. Cooke's fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's fantastic that one of his accomplishments is a reduction in suspensions. That's great news!
Signed,
Parent whose kids attend a WOTP ES and the idea of suspensions is something I didn't even know I needed to consider until I started getting the sales pitches on going IB to Hardy.
And what is that a 'fantastic accomplishment'? From what I observe almost daily on the sidewalks of Tenleytown, DC schools, particularly Wilson, could use more suspensions -- and even expulsions!
Wow the reactionary and racist nature of DCUM never fails but still surprises me. One of the least effective ways to change behavior is through suspensions and expulsions. In fact, it reinforces and extends the behavior issues. The point is to address the antecedents to prevent the 'need' for these actions. Which starts with stopping thinking from a racist mindset of thinking of kids who have not been supported to succeed in school and/or home as 'thugs'
So you're assuming that all of the major delinquents among Wilson students are minorities? What does that say about you?!
Ah, the old "You noticed a racist dog whistle so it's YOU who are racist" switcheroo! Bzzt, thanks for playing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's fantastic that one of his accomplishments is a reduction in suspensions. That's great news!
Signed,
Parent whose kids attend a WOTP ES and the idea of suspensions is something I didn't even know I needed to consider until I started getting the sales pitches on going IB to Hardy.
And what is that a 'fantastic accomplishment'? From what I observe almost daily on the sidewalks of Tenleytown, DC schools, particularly Wilson, could use more suspensions -- and even expulsions!
Wow the reactionary and racist nature of DCUM never fails but still surprises me. One of the least effective ways to change behavior is through suspensions and expulsions. In fact, it reinforces and extends the behavior issues. The point is to address the antecedents to prevent the 'need' for these actions. Which starts with stopping thinking from a racist mindset of thinking of kids who have not been supported to succeed in school and/or home as 'thugs'
So you're assuming that all of the major delinquents among Wilson students are minorities? What does that say about you?!