Which one of you will run for president next? I would love to vote for you . Honest, generous, genius, competent people state your name please and you will have my vote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-commits-testify-under-oath-100-percent-n770451

What could possibly go wrong with that?

You really believe him,?

I believe there are some bluffs about to be called in the next six months. Congress already asked for the "tapes".

Anonymous wrote:
I find it hilarious so many people are stating things like "Comey outwitted him, Comey is playing chess", etc. That is the very definition of a banana republic, a soft coup. Their 'guy' didn't get elected so they are going to band together and kick him out office.

This is the absolute, 100% OPPOSITE of a soft coup.

This is using the legal process lawfully and deliberately, to protect our country from a man who is unfit to serve.

And Trump is doing this all to himself. If he would shut up, and learn how to be President, and listen to his legal advisers, he'd have no problem staying in his position.

Anonymous wrote:Where are the tapes? Trump said there are tapes - bring them out!

Perhaps Billy Bush has them.

There is no doubt in my mind that they will find something if they want to. And if they get him out of office, then Pence becomes the next victim. Then Ryan, though the republicans might stop there, since they have their globalist in office.

I find it hilarious so many people are stating things like "Comey outwitted him, Comey is playing chess", etc. That is the very definition of a banana republic, a soft coup. Their 'guy' didn't get elected so they are going to band together and kick him out office.

Clinton clearly broke the law - intent means nothing in those sort of cases, except for in the sentencing phase. We now know that there was collusion between Obama's DOJ and Comey in favor of Hillary. Not even a blip in the press radar.

That Ryan is not speaking out on that is pretty damning.

The addition of Dreeben is interesting. Every law scholar and legal professional I follow is unanimous in that he is a mastermind at criminal law and utterly faithful to the constitution.

To the people saying there's no proof yet: so you understand Watergate took 2 years? This is infinitely wider than watergate. This investigation could literally take years to conduct and wrap up. Unfortunately we are stuck with Trump during that time unless he blessedly resigns. The "lack" of proof right after a special counsel has been appointed does not vindicate you or the trump team, believe me. It's ludicrous to suggest.

Where are the tapes? Trump said there are tapes - bring them out!

I really wish we had some kind of split screen with a West Wing cam of Priebus or Kasowicz's face at that moment.

But what would the obligatory special bar cocktails for Trump Testimony Day be called?
I like an "Orange Russian".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-commits-testify-under-oath-100-percent-n770451

What could possibly go wrong with that?

You really believe him,?

I believe that if Clinton can be supoenaed about Pauls Jones, Mueller will find a way to subpoena Trump and put him under oath. (For the 85 IQ Trumpkin set, these are orders, nor requests or suggestions). What Trump wants, or is "100%," or even 0% willing to to do has nothing to do with his big orange butt ending up with a purjury problem. Again-- see Bill Clinton.

Anonymous wrote:http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-commits-testify-under-oath-100-percent-n770451

What could possibly go wrong with that?

You really believe him,?

I did. Here's what I found:

http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202789177543/Mueller-Enlists-Top-Criminal-Law-Expert-for-Russia-Probe?slreturn=20170509223834

The National Law Journal June 9, 2017

Deputy SG Michael Dreeben, who has argued more than 100 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, will assist Bob Mueller on a part-time basis, according to those familiar with the arrangement. The move signals that Mueller may be seeking advice on complex areas of criminal law, including what constitutes obstruction of justice.

Anonymous wrote:Lot of lunatics ranting here. Not much else.

Still waiting for fireworks.......and nothing. Still waiting.......

Google Deputy Solicitor General Dreeban, as in the DOJ attorney now detailed to assist Mueller in his investigation of obstruction of justice.

Anonymous wrote:Lot of lunatics ranting here. Not much else.

Still waiting for fireworks.......and nothing. Still waiting.......

It's not a hollywood movie. Public corruption cases are, by and large, boring. Fortunately the special prosecutor will be unconcerned with how well entertained you are by it all.

Anonymous wrote:Lot of lunatics ranting here. Not much else.

Still waiting for fireworks.......and nothing. Still waiting.......

Go away Boris.