Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be some kind of achievement gap -,whether at charters, Wilson or across America. Perhaps we should focus more on making schools excellent, engaging and responsive to the students they serve than on closing a gap for groups of people that we've thrown into a definition.
That's why you need to track median growth percentile. You can see whether all students (advanced, struggling and in the middle) are improving and learning compared to where they were the previous year.
You can find this data now. But people believe the anecdotes more and behave like sheep.
Where does one find the median growth percentile?
For charters it is the first item on page 2 of each school's PMF report http://www.dcpcsb.org/report/school-quality-reports-pmf
For DCPS go to the DCPS school profile page and click into a school page. http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/ Then click into the "scorecard" tab, and then click under "student progress"
It is PARCC based - percentage of students that improved from year to year relative to their previous scores. But more gives a different picture from just the percentage achieving 4 or 5.
Except it's not the same children, there is so much movement of students between schools, teachers, principals and DCPS initiatives that all the data is meaningless!
No, the scores follow the kid and are reported.
And most students don't move much from 3rd to 8th, and if they move it is into/out of DC. High school is where the greatest churn is (from the DME task force data).
So your telling me when a child moves school the scores follow them? Well that's another reason for Charters to not accept some children, if you're reading at a 3rd grader by middle and high how are you ever going to pass PARCC at grade level? DCPS teaches grade level Common Core curricula so the children are doomed, unless DCPS allows teachers to meet students were they are at. Which they are not allowed to do, it's "rigor" without an understanding that for children reading at an elem level at middle/high school any work at 6th grade level is rigor! Same with math, yet teachers all over DCPS held to same standards with no regard for the population or behavior levels that's why despite having highest pay scale in the area Principals and teachers keep leaving. Churn & burn, churn & burn, and leads to even more instability for kids who need the most support as is exemplified in this article. As most folks on DCUM do not have their children in schools such as Ballou it doesn't generate much interest. WOTP schools are much more stable, and it leads to the myth of the lousy lazy teacher stories.
Anonymous wrote:DCPS isn't opening new schools anyway, so what you're calling for is a moratorium on charters. The city is going to add about 45,000 school-age kids in the next decade if Office of Planning is to be believed, and it looks like all of them are going to go to charters. So a moratorium on charters makes no sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be some kind of achievement gap -,whether at charters, Wilson or across America. Perhaps we should focus more on making schools excellent, engaging and responsive to the students they serve than on closing a gap for groups of people that we've thrown into a definition.
That's why you need to track median growth percentile. You can see whether all students (advanced, struggling and in the middle) are improving and learning compared to where they were the previous year.
You can find this data now. But people believe the anecdotes more and behave like sheep.
Where does one find the median growth percentile?
For charters it is the first item on page 2 of each school's PMF report http://www.dcpcsb.org/report/school-quality-reports-pmf
For DCPS go to the DCPS school profile page and click into a school page. http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/ Then click into the "scorecard" tab, and then click under "student progress"
It is PARCC based - percentage of students that improved from year to year relative to their previous scores. But more gives a different picture from just the percentage achieving 4 or 5.
Except it's not the same children, there is so much movement of students between schools, teachers, principals and DCPS initiatives that all the data is meaningless!
No, the scores follow the kid and are reported.
And most students don't move much from 3rd to 8th, and if they move it is into/out of DC. High school is where the greatest churn is (from the DME task force data).
So your telling me when a child moves school the scores follow them? Well that's another reason for Charters to not accept some children, if you're reading at a 3rd grader by middle and high how are you ever going to pass PARCC at grade level? DCPS teaches grade level Common Core curricula so the children are doomed, unless DCPS allows teachers to meet students were they are at. Which they are not allowed to do, it's "rigor" without an understanding that for children reading at an elem level at middle/high school any work at 6th grade level is rigor! Same with math, yet teachers all over DCPS held to same standards with no regard for the population or behavior levels that's why despite having highest pay scale in the area Principals and teachers keep leaving. Churn & burn, churn & burn, and leads to even more instability for kids who need the most support as is exemplified in this article. As most folks on DCUM do not have their children in schools such as Ballou it doesn't generate much interest. WOTP schools are much more stable, and it leads to the myth of the lousy lazy teacher stories.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be some kind of achievement gap -,whether at charters, Wilson or across America. Perhaps we should focus more on making schools excellent, engaging and responsive to the students they serve than on closing a gap for groups of people that we've thrown into a definition.
That's why you need to track median growth percentile. You can see whether all students (advanced, struggling and in the middle) are improving and learning compared to where they were the previous year.
You can find this data now. But people believe the anecdotes more and behave like sheep.
Where does one find the median growth percentile?
For charters it is the first item on page 2 of each school's PMF report http://www.dcpcsb.org/report/school-quality-reports-pmf
For DCPS go to the DCPS school profile page and click into a school page. http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/ Then click into the "scorecard" tab, and then click under "student progress"
It is PARCC based - percentage of students that improved from year to year relative to their previous scores. But more gives a different picture from just the percentage achieving 4 or 5.
Except it's not the same children, there is so much movement of students between schools, teachers, principals and DCPS initiatives that all the data is meaningless!
No, the scores follow the kid and are reported.
And most students don't move much from 3rd to 8th, and if they move it is into/out of DC. High school is where the greatest churn is (from the DME task force data).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be some kind of achievement gap -,whether at charters, Wilson or across America. Perhaps we should focus more on making schools excellent, engaging and responsive to the students they serve than on closing a gap for groups of people that we've thrown into a definition.
That's why you need to track median growth percentile. You can see whether all students (advanced, struggling and in the middle) are improving and learning compared to where they were the previous year.
You can find this data now. But people believe the anecdotes more and behave like sheep.
Where does one find the median growth percentile?
For charters it is the first item on page 2 of each school's PMF report http://www.dcpcsb.org/report/school-quality-reports-pmf
For DCPS go to the DCPS school profile page and click into a school page. http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/ Then click into the "scorecard" tab, and then click under "student progress"
It is PARCC based - percentage of students that improved from year to year relative to their previous scores. But more gives a different picture from just the percentage achieving 4 or 5.
Except it's not the same children, there is so much movement of students between schools, teachers, principals and DCPS initiatives that all the data is meaningless!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be some kind of achievement gap -,whether at charters, Wilson or across America. Perhaps we should focus more on making schools excellent, engaging and responsive to the students they serve than on closing a gap for groups of people that we've thrown into a definition.
That's why you need to track median growth percentile. You can see whether all students (advanced, struggling and in the middle) are improving and learning compared to where they were the previous year.
You can find this data now. But people believe the anecdotes more and behave like sheep.
Where does one find the median growth percentile?
For charters it is the first item on page 2 of each school's PMF report http://www.dcpcsb.org/report/school-quality-reports-pmf
For DCPS go to the DCPS school profile page and click into a school page. http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/ Then click into the "scorecard" tab, and then click under "student progress"
It is PARCC based - percentage of students that improved from year to year relative to their previous scores. But more gives a different picture from just the percentage achieving 4 or 5.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be some kind of achievement gap -,whether at charters, Wilson or across America. Perhaps we should focus more on making schools excellent, engaging and responsive to the students they serve than on closing a gap for groups of people that we've thrown into a definition.
That's why you need to track median growth percentile. You can see whether all students (advanced, struggling and in the middle) are improving and learning compared to where they were the previous year.
You can find this data now. But people believe the anecdotes more and behave like sheep.
Where does one find the median growth percentile?
For charters it is the first item on page 2 of each school's PMF report http://www.dcpcsb.org/report/school-quality-reports-pmf
Except it's not the same children, there is so much movement of students between schools, teachers, principals and DCPS initiatives that all the data is meaningless!
For DCPS go to the DCPS school profile page and click into a school page. http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/ Then click into the "scorecard" tab, and then click under "student progress"
It is PARCC based - percentage of students that improved from year to year relative to their previous scores. But more gives a different picture from just the percentage achieving 4 or 5.
Anonymous wrote:There will always be some kind of achievement gap -,whether at charters, Wilson or across America. Perhaps we should focus more on making schools excellent, engaging and responsive to the students they serve than on closing a gap for groups of people that we've thrown into a definition.