Anonymous wrote:My son's travel team: 1 in highly gifted program, 5 at very competitive private schools and seem to be doing very well, 1 skipped a grade, 1 is in some crazy math program working three years ahead, 4 others seem like average kids but well-educated professional parents so likely they do well too.
Parents: I'd say more than half have graduate level educations. We gave 3 doctors and 5 lawyers and 3 PhDs and not sure about the remaining parents but they're all smart, successful people. I think in this area you really aren't going to find travel teams that fit the scenario you suggest.
Anonymous wrote:Obviously not all, but you know what I mean. The best case scenario is your teen is one of the top 5% (?) who will get an athletic scholarship to college. OK...well...they still have to major in something. Patrician sports parents get this, but the middle class sports -- football, basketball, baseball, soccer, volleyball, softball, swimming -- parents rarely seem to. They let the sport just consume their and their kid's life, then they get to college and can only handle communications or sociology.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of the kids I know who are high level athletes are also outstanding students.
Bullshit. Maybe at STA or Langley, but not at an average public.
Are you concerned that kids who are talented at both athletics and academics will have an advantage over kids who have great academics but not other talents?
Oh right. No public school grads ever get a D1 scholarship. I forgot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of the kids I know who are high level athletes are also outstanding students.
Bullshit. Maybe at STA or Langley, but not at an average public.
Are you concerned that kids who are talented at both athletics and academics will have an advantage over kids who have great academics but not other talents?
Anonymous wrote:Focussing on elite sports vs academics in some white families is a sign of white privilege.
Anonymous wrote:The academics vs sports debate is not something you can compare. Bring the smartest kid has nothing to do with talent. Anyone can be a tip scholar, not everyone can be a tip athlete and a top scholar.
Colleges, employers know toots and seek them our.
Many of the academic types who go to debate clubs. Chess clubs, writing camps etc spend just ad much time and money at those activities as do athletes. The difference. Being one dementional vs two dimensional.
My daughter's club teams, every single player is a top tier student whip will get money for school for academics before sport's.
A recent graduate at Harvard played soccer at good council, a recent graduate of bcc played soccer at stanford, she took the academic scholarship instead of the sports one so the team could give the sports scholarship to another player. A local volleyball player is enrolling st Harvard this fall. Read the local commitments, it is pretty impressive
Sure many kids enroll at those schools but it is a lot easier if that is your dole focus.
I would take an athlete who is committed to their academics and sport over the top ranked non athlete 100% of the time.
Anonymous wrote:My boys are straight A students have been since elementary school.
They have always been completely self-motivated and always did their homework ahead of time without pressure from me.
My DH and I were Ivy athletes.