Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.
You don't need men.
Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.
You don't need men.
Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that it is a great time to be a man. Because of the imbalance in educated women to men and the changing values of society. I do not worry for my sons and I am concerned about my daughter's prospects.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.
You don't need men.
I don't want to have a baby by myself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.
You don't need men.
Please leave
No the PP, but what's wrong with this response?
Because you're robbing your child of having a father? B/c every single study done shows children do better in 2-parent households? Especially boys.
So let me get this straight. If I can provide a loving stable home for a child, I should not have one because the one thing I don't have is a partner? It would be better in your eyes to settle for a man, any man, then embark on this journey by myself? And when the marriage goes south, because I settled, it's better that the children live through divorce? Or maybe you think that I should have to have to suck it up and endure the marriage I settled for because I wanted children? Then again, what if he leaves against my wishes--you know because you can't control if someone wants to be in a relationship.
I'm not trying to upset you, but if you cannot find a decent partner who wants to live his/her life with you, then there is something wrong with you.
And so no, you should not procreate and you should also not burden your child with your mental illness/personality disorder, esp. since will be no other co-parent they can turn to when you get too cray.
Np. Pp, I would love to know: how old are you? My guess is that you are older, from the time when unmarried women were seen as failures and old maids? Or maybe from a culture that still sees it that way?
Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.
You don't need men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that it is a great time to be a man. Because of the imbalance in educated women to men and the changing values of society. I do not worry for my sons and I am concerned about my daughter's prospects.
I'm think the opposite- it's a horrible time to be a man. Look at all the anti men marches, rants, and raves. I worry more about my son's future than I do my son's.
Anonymous wrote:This article basically says he'll never buy the cow if he can get the milk for free. Grandma knew that, it's not new.
Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that it is a great time to be a man. Because of the imbalance in educated women to men and the changing values of society. I do not worry for my sons and I am concerned about my daughter's prospects.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.
You don't need men.
Please leave
No the PP, but what's wrong with this response?
Because you're robbing your child of having a father? B/c every single study done shows children do better in 2-parent households? Especially boys.
Who needs boys. They grow into men and they are clearly surplus to requirements.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.
You don't need men.
Please leave
No the PP, but what's wrong with this response?
Because you're robbing your child of having a father? B/c every single study done shows children do better in 2-parent households? Especially boys.
So let me get this straight. If I can provide a loving stable home for a child, I should not have one because the one thing I don't have is a partner? It would be better in your eyes to settle for a man, any man, then embark on this journey by myself? And when the marriage goes south, because I settled, it's better that the children live through divorce? Or maybe you think that I should have to have to suck it up and endure the marriage I settled for because I wanted children? Then again, what if he leaves against my wishes--you know because you can't control if someone wants to be in a relationship.
I'm not trying to upset you, but if you cannot find a decent partner who wants to live his/her life with you, then there is something wrong with you.
And so no, you should not procreate and you should also not burden your child with your mental illness/personality disorder, esp. since will be no other co-parent they can turn to when you get too cray.
Anonymous wrote:This article basically says he'll never buy the cow if he can get the milk for free. Grandma knew that, it's not new.
Also, men prize different qualities in women than women prize in men. An average looking woman with an ivy league education is not the equal of an average looking man with an ivy education. A female preschool [vimeo]teacher with a hot body has far more dating options than the hot bodied male preschool teacher. Same doesn't mean equal