Anonymous wrote:They are important but not the summer after freshman year. I'd focus on just having a summer job, regardless of field. I hire college interns and really only look at students for the summer after junior year when they've actually had some solid coursework in the field, good idea of what they want to do, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Tell him to get a LinkedIn account if he doesn't have one and join groups. Tell people within the groups he needs an internship.
Also, see if his school has access to Leadership Directories. Find contacts and write to them.
I'm a college career director and big believer in just writing to places of interest or calling them.
Anonymous wrote:Tell him to get a LinkedIn account if he doesn't have one and join groups. Tell people within the groups he needs an internship.
Also, see if his school has access to Leadership Directories. Find contacts and write to them.
I'm a college career director and big believer in just writing to places of interest or calling them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess it depends on how you define an 'internship" -- one reason we don't hire younger students is because our interns are treated as real employees. They are paid, they do real work, and are treated as a regular part of the team.
The PP who posted the video noted a legal internship requires "The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern". How is 'advantage' defined? I'm not hiring someone who will not provide me an 'advantage', that is, to me, they will produce actual work, which includes making copies if that's what's needed at a particular time (really, we rarely copy anything and if we do generally the person who needs them makes the copies). But, we do pay our interns above minimum wage.
The law is the law PP. Just make sure you follow so you don't get sued like Fox Searchlight picture. Don't be using interns as low paid or free labor to otherwise replace professionals. Time to protect the worker!
Who wrote The Iron Heel?
Where's Joe Hill buried at?
Which eye is Big Bill Haywood missing?
How'd Frank Little die?
WTF PP? You sound unhinged. OP asked a simple question. Either you answer her question or move on.![]()
- np
Anonymous wrote:I had various internships while I was in college -- think tanks, Capitol Hill, etc. and honestly, I wish I had worked a real job.
One thing that I have found is that an actual honest to god job job is more likely to yield you the kinds of experiences that you can talk about in actual job interviews in the future. If you look at the sorts of questions people ask in job interviews (i.e. Tell us about a time when you had a conflict with a coworker and how you resolved it; Tell us about a time you had to implement an unpopular decision; Tell us about a time when you had to work with others) they're looking for real-world experiences where you had some responsibility and had to work well with a boss and with coworkers, where you had to make decisions. Being an RA for one person in a think tank doesn't really give you those experiences.
My kids have had lots of real world experiences as RA's, camp counselors, lifeguards, waitresses and this has given them the sorts of experiences that they can use to answer those types of questions in a job interview. Look at the new foreign service exam. The skills questionnaire or whatever it is asks questions about 'a time you had to work with someone from a different culture,' etc. Having had an actual job probably provides a better set of experiences for answering those questions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess it depends on how you define an 'internship" -- one reason we don't hire younger students is because our interns are treated as real employees. They are paid, they do real work, and are treated as a regular part of the team.
The PP who posted the video noted a legal internship requires "The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern". How is 'advantage' defined? I'm not hiring someone who will not provide me an 'advantage', that is, to me, they will produce actual work, which includes making copies if that's what's needed at a particular time (really, we rarely copy anything and if we do generally the person who needs them makes the copies). But, we do pay our interns above minimum wage.
The law is the law PP. Just make sure you follow so you don't get sued like Fox Searchlight picture. Don't be using interns as low paid or free labor to otherwise replace professionals. Time to protect the worker!
Who wrote The Iron Heel?
Where's Joe Hill buried at?
Which eye is Big Bill Haywood missing?
How'd Frank Little die?
Anonymous wrote:I guess it depends on how you define an 'internship" -- one reason we don't hire younger students is because our interns are treated as real employees. They are paid, they do real work, and are treated as a regular part of the team.
The PP who posted the video noted a legal internship requires "The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern". How is 'advantage' defined? I'm not hiring someone who will not provide me an 'advantage', that is, to me, they will produce actual work, which includes making copies if that's what's needed at a particular time (really, we rarely copy anything and if we do generally the person who needs them makes the copies). But, we do pay our interns above minimum wage.