Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone has all As these days. Tiger moms do not allow Bs — ever.
Damn straight. Anything less than an A better have a good reason behind it. Have you seen the GPAs needed to get into UVA and W&M?
Signed,
Tiger Dad.
Anonymous wrote:I somewhat agree with OP. It is a numbers game with students needing both test scores and GPA. Schools post average GPAs, which students and parents seize on as the indicator of how exclusive and desireable the school is. Rigor matters, but I think mostly to the extent it can raise your weighted GPA higher in order to get the school's average up. There are examples where it is more advantageous for a student (in terms of admissions) o focus on GPA rather then taking the most challenging courses, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grade inflation is insane. Bs = Putz. All As are ten a penny. You need All As just to get a look.
Disregard the Dummy State parents on here & college confidential saying Bs or the occasional C doesn't matter.
The reference to "Dummy State" make me wonder: Did you push your DC only to shoot for Ivys, or what?
It's a genuine question. I wonder what experience is behind this post. Did your child not get into the school you wanted? . Or did, with all As thanks to grade inflation since you bring that up? What's the story?
Anonymous wrote:Everyone has all As these days. Tiger moms do not allow Bs — ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A number of posts here seem to be based on an erroneous assumption. The fact that most kids who matriculated at particular school had stats (test scores/GPA) within a particular range, does NOT mean that most applicants to the school that had those credentials were admitted. Quite the contrary, at highly selective schools. Many, many more kids with the same stats were rejected.
Also, remember that the CDS range is 25th to 75th percentile, so falling just barely within it doesn't put a kid in range -- it puts the kid damned near the bottom quarter of the class. And being within the range on one measure but not another generally means you're not in the range period. The successful applicant will typically have both (as well as something else to recommend him/herself -- see paragraph 1).
Well put, thanks.
Anonymous wrote:A number of posts here seem to be based on an erroneous assumption. The fact that most kids who matriculated at particular school had stats (test scores/GPA) within a particular range, does NOT mean that most applicants to the school that had those credentials were admitted. Quite the contrary, at highly selective schools. Many, many more kids with the same stats were rejected.
Also, remember that the CDS range is 25th to 75th percentile, so falling just barely within it doesn't put a kid in range -- it puts the kid damned near the bottom quarter of the class. And being within the range on one measure but not another generally means you're not in the range period. The successful applicant will typically have both (as well as something else to recommend him/herself -- see paragraph 1).
Anonymous wrote:Grade inflation is insane. Bs = Putz. All As are ten a penny. You need All As just to get a look.
Disregard the Dummy State parents on here & college confidential saying Bs or the occasional C doesn't matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With grade inflation being as rampant as it is, if you don't have at least a 4.0 W/GPA, you're not really trying.
+1000
My DD will graduate with a 4.0 UW from her NoVA HS. She is smart, and I give her plenty of credit, but she isn't slaving away for hours on end. Maybe 1-2 hrs per day tops. Plenty of time for tv and ECs every day. She isn't alone...there are plenty of kids at her school with a similar profile. The grade inflation is real.
Agree. We are in FCPS and 4.0 unwaited. 6 AP classes so far + 5 next year (she is Junior now), plus two varsity team sports without putting much efforts. We also traveling a lot and she easily skips a week here and there and catching up without any problems.