Anonymous
Post 05/01/2017 10:18     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.


Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.


There are also children involved.

The IG should prove it or move on.





Interesting, because regular crime involves children all the time, and criminal law doesn't allow for an exception whenever children are involved.

Immigration law doesn't work this way either. Lots of poor children are coming home to an empty house because their parents have been deported.

I'm not saying there SHOULDN'T be considerations for kids, but in these examples it's a matter of putting kids on their appropriate school. It's more important to fight corruption.

I for one, plan on pushing my useless ward representative to make sure this does not go unpunished.


The punishment was already meted out -- Henderson has been reprimanded.

As for the families, unless they bribed her or are living outside the district, there's literally nothing to punish them for. And certainly no laws on the book to cover this scenario.

Time for everyone to move on.


"Reprimanded"?!? Give me a fucking break. She committed a crime, the families committed a crime, but we are supposed to look the other way?

Listen Kaya, aren't you busy with your modeling career? Stay off DCUM, I'm tired of reading your excuses.


No, it was not a "crime," particularly on the part of the families. Go read the DC Code; if you can find a statute that was violated please inform the rest of us.
Anonymous
Post 05/01/2017 10:16     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.


Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.


There are also children involved.

The IG should prove it or move on.





Interesting, because regular crime involves children all the time, and criminal law doesn't allow for an exception whenever children are involved.

Immigration law doesn't work this way either. Lots of poor children are coming home to an empty house because their parents have been deported.

I'm not saying there SHOULDN'T be considerations for kids, but in these examples it's a matter of putting kids on their appropriate school. It's more important to fight corruption.

I for one, plan on pushing my useless ward representative to make sure this does not go unpunished.


The punishment was already meted out -- Henderson has been reprimanded.

As for the families, unless they bribed her or are living outside the district, there's literally nothing to punish them for. And certainly no laws on the book to cover this scenario.

Time for everyone to move on.


"Reprimanded"?!? Give me a fucking break. She committed a crime, the families committed a crime, but we are supposed to look the other way?

Listen Kaya, aren't you busy with your modeling career? Stay off DCUM, I'm tired of reading your excuses.
Anonymous
Post 04/30/2017 20:41     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.


Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.


There are also children involved.

The IG should prove it or move on.





Interesting, because regular crime involves children all the time, and criminal law doesn't allow for an exception whenever children are involved.

Immigration law doesn't work this way either. Lots of poor children are coming home to an empty house because their parents have been deported.

I'm not saying there SHOULDN'T be considerations for kids, but in these examples it's a matter of putting kids on their appropriate school. It's more important to fight corruption.

I for one, plan on pushing my useless ward representative to make sure this does not go unpunished.


The punishment was already meted out -- Henderson has been reprimanded.

As for the families, unless they bribed her or are living outside the district, there's literally nothing to punish them for. And certainly no laws on the book to cover this scenario.

Time for everyone to move on.
Anonymous
Post 04/30/2017 20:32     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.


Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.


There are also children involved.

The IG should prove it or move on.





Interesting, because regular crime involves children all the time, and criminal law doesn't allow for an exception whenever children are involved.

Immigration law doesn't work this way either. Lots of poor children are coming home to an empty house because their parents have been deported.

I'm not saying there SHOULDN'T be considerations for kids, but in these examples it's a matter of putting kids on their appropriate school. It's more important to fight corruption.

I for one, plan on pushing my useless ward representative to make sure this does not go unpunished.
Anonymous
Post 04/30/2017 20:10     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.


Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.


There are also children involved.

The IG should prove it or move on.





Yes, the IG should release the full report. Let the chips fall where they may.
Anonymous
Post 04/30/2017 19:57     Subject: Crooked Kaya

I;ve never bee a Henderson fan, but see this as a non-issue.

What ever happened to her, anyhow?
Anonymous
Post 04/30/2017 09:21     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:I'm more curious about what DCPS schools these families ended up at.


You know as well as I do that they were Wilson / Deal feeders. Perhaps SWW.
Anonymous
Post 04/30/2017 09:02     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

I'm more curious about what DCPS schools these families ended up at.
Anonymous
Post 04/29/2017 23:01     Subject: Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:I think it would be way more embarrassing to the families than KH. At least one case involves someone from the previous administration pulling strings.


Follow up to say anyone in her shoes would have been foolish to not pull strings, as corrupt as that shows our system to be.
Anonymous
Post 04/29/2017 22:57     Subject: Crooked Kaya

I think it would be way more embarrassing to the families than KH. At least one case involves someone from the previous administration pulling strings.
Anonymous
Post 04/29/2017 22:40     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.


Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.


There are also children involved.

The IG should prove it or move on.



Anonymous
Post 04/29/2017 13:49     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.


Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.
Anonymous
Post 04/29/2017 11:48     Subject: Crooked Kaya

Not news worthy. A better story is Principal discretion when a family moves OOB.
Anonymous
Post 04/29/2017 09:28     Subject: Crooked Kaya

Discretion is fine. The question is whether she abused her discretion. Not sure how to balance the discretion, but DCPS is not an institution that can just say trust us.
Anonymous
Post 04/28/2017 18:54     Subject: Re:Crooked Kaya

Anonymous wrote:Is the underlying report public?


No. So far only NBC4 has it, and they got a leaked copy.