Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.
Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.
There are also children involved.
The IG should prove it or move on.
Interesting, because regular crime involves children all the time, and criminal law doesn't allow for an exception whenever children are involved.
Immigration law doesn't work this way either. Lots of poor children are coming home to an empty house because their parents have been deported.
I'm not saying there SHOULDN'T be considerations for kids, but in these examples it's a matter of putting kids on their appropriate school. It's more important to fight corruption.
I for one, plan on pushing my useless ward representative to make sure this does not go unpunished.
The punishment was already meted out -- Henderson has been reprimanded.
As for the families, unless they bribed her or are living outside the district, there's literally nothing to punish them for. And certainly no laws on the book to cover this scenario.
Time for everyone to move on.
"Reprimanded"?!? Give me a fucking break. She committed a crime, the families committed a crime, but we are supposed to look the other way?
Listen Kaya, aren't you busy with your modeling career? Stay off DCUM, I'm tired of reading your excuses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.
Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.
There are also children involved.
The IG should prove it or move on.
Interesting, because regular crime involves children all the time, and criminal law doesn't allow for an exception whenever children are involved.
Immigration law doesn't work this way either. Lots of poor children are coming home to an empty house because their parents have been deported.
I'm not saying there SHOULDN'T be considerations for kids, but in these examples it's a matter of putting kids on their appropriate school. It's more important to fight corruption.
I for one, plan on pushing my useless ward representative to make sure this does not go unpunished.
The punishment was already meted out -- Henderson has been reprimanded.
As for the families, unless they bribed her or are living outside the district, there's literally nothing to punish them for. And certainly no laws on the book to cover this scenario.
Time for everyone to move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.
Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.
There are also children involved.
The IG should prove it or move on.
Interesting, because regular crime involves children all the time, and criminal law doesn't allow for an exception whenever children are involved.
Immigration law doesn't work this way either. Lots of poor children are coming home to an empty house because their parents have been deported.
I'm not saying there SHOULDN'T be considerations for kids, but in these examples it's a matter of putting kids on their appropriate school. It's more important to fight corruption.
I for one, plan on pushing my useless ward representative to make sure this does not go unpunished.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.
Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.
There are also children involved.
The IG should prove it or move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.
Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.
There are also children involved.
The IG should prove it or move on.
Anonymous wrote:I'm more curious about what DCPS schools these families ended up at.
Anonymous wrote:I think it would be way more embarrassing to the families than KH. At least one case involves someone from the previous administration pulling strings.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.
Of course not. It's DCPS classified. They will cite "privacy and confidentiality" but the real reason is to avoid embarrassment to the DC cronies and other well-connected parents.
jsteele wrote:Sadly not a surprise. The report says there were seven instances but won't name the officials who received the preferential treatment.
Anonymous wrote:Is the underlying report public?