Lonely_Sojourner wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she's attractive. Maybe not a "classic beauty," but if her personality is nice, and the chemistry is there, I'd be happy with her. Most men would. The idea that "men feel entitled to supermodels" is mostly toxic feminist BS.

+1 Completely agree with ALL. Most of the time, women are their own worst enemies. Either backstabbing other women or denigrating themselves in some form or fashion. You can tell that this little lady takes care of herself. So, if the other pieces of the puzzle are there, why not? I'm a 50 y.o. widowed male and I'd love to have her number!!


LS

You know who really understands women?


Other women.


That's why they hate each other.

She may have other attributes or abilities that you aren't aware of.


FWIW, I find her attractive, in a classic sense, but she's far too thin for my liking. She needs about 15 more pounds.

The next French President is 39 years old and is married to a 64 year-old, they are right about love being blind

rich isn't the problem. Most wealthy men are ugly. I can't do ugly.

I'm still laughing that a guy basically placed his personal ad in this thread.

Anonymous wrote:Only another woman would say she is not very pretty.

My husband would say she is not very pretty.

OP, are you the one who keeps posting about Kate as well? If so, please consider getting therapy, in all seriousness. It is sad, really. But you can kick it. Just please get some help, you need help to move on, not to reinforce your problem. Good luck.

You don't have to be all of that to marry rich.
I'm not attractive, but my soon to be husband is really nice looking, and wealthy. I originally thought he was just a hardworker who came from a middle class family. I treat him well, we have a good relationship, and his family is amazing to me.

Why do people care about these workshy inbred trash? Omg George is soooo adorable!!!! It's so sad. Get a life.

She's pretty!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh ok, yeah. Having a bad day, OP?

She's pretty much the picture of classic beauty.

Pippa Middleton??


You think she is a classic beauty?

Yep, I do, even with a bad picture like that. Post your picture OP, I'd love to see it.

Why is the only measure of a woman's worth her looks with you people? Who are you?

This thread is ridiculous and mean spirited. She's not pretty but she has a very nice body and she looks better than most British women. But since I am a big royal gossip person just wanted to point out a few things:
1. The middletons themselves are actually not super wealthy. They're still rich but honestly there are probably a decent chunk of people on this site that are just as wealthy/wealthier Carole's brother is incredibly successful and was the main investor in their party pieces business. That said because of Kate's marriage you can't get more connected!
2. James Matthews brother is super trashy (on a reality show) and he is reportedly not quite as wealthy as he was originally claimed to be. But still really wealthy.
3. Pippa's face looks older because she smokes and fake tans. No bueno.

Anonymous wrote:White women age in dog years. Yikes!

Girl, please:

http://www.closerweekly.com/posts/helen-mirren-reveals-her-celebrity-crush-find-out-who-it-is-56648

White women age in dog years. Yikes!

I wish I looked like that on a casual day! What beautiful cheekbones and eyes. I think she's gorgeous.

--A woman