Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That explains BCC, but where is Whitman? My guess is this:
• Step 2: Identify high schools that performed at or better than the state average for their least advantaged students
Yep. This comes up every year. If you don't have any "least advantaged" students, or a statistically uncountable number, you lose out on a major metric. Which is fine. Whiteman families will just have to assume their school is fine.
So Churchill and Wooton can make the list because do have "least advantaged" students? I wonder where they live.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That explains BCC, but where is Whitman? My guess is this:
• Step 2: Identify high schools that performed at or better than the state average for their least advantaged students
Yep. This comes up every year. If you don't have any "least advantaged" students, or a statistically uncountable number, you lose out on a major metric. Which is fine. Whiteman families will just have to assume their school is fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eleanor Roosevelt in *gasp* PG County is ranked #23
Have at it, it could be ranked super duper and it is still in PG
Anonymous wrote:Eleanor Roosevelt in *gasp* PG County is ranked #23
Anonymous wrote:DC not enrolled at Churchill because we are in private...but I am happy for this report cause it only helps our home value. Yay!!
Anonymous wrote:So the methodology means you have to have disadvantages students as a control group within the school...hence town-based (and non-diverse schools within a county) are effectively excluded.
I get the rationale, and no metric is perfect, but looks like budget cuts at USNews made them forget to do a gut check on results.
At then end of the day, whatever - it's not like anyone really thinks these rankings matter much.
Anonymous wrote:Whtiman's great schools ranking dropped to 8. Are we sure there isn't a problem?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All W schools are top 1% btw.
Whiteman wasn't ranked.
Anonymous wrote:All W schools are top 1% btw.