Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't actually know any teams who knew each other before they were formed by ASA in kindergarten. ASA just groups kids together by school, and parents volunteer to coach. Out of our school's 6 teams, 1 girls team is very good, 1 girls team is pretty good and the 3rd girls team rarely wins. 1 boys team is very good, 1 boys team is decent and 1 boys team never wins. (Oddly, the same coach coaches the very good girls' team and the not-good boys' team.)
Let me guess - your first child? We have three kids in ASA and that was true for our first in K - minimal previous experience and randomly placed with other kids from the same school. 2nd and 3rd kids were way more proficient in K (played with older siblings; mini academy for 2 years) and were pulled onto teams by coaches we know. Much stronger teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't actually know any teams who knew each other before they were formed by ASA in kindergarten. ASA just groups kids together by school, and parents volunteer to coach. Out of our school's 6 teams, 1 girls team is very good, 1 girls team is pretty good and the 3rd girls team rarely wins. 1 boys team is very good, 1 boys team is decent and 1 boys team never wins. (Oddly, the same coach coaches the very good girls' team and the not-good boys' team.)
Let me guess - your first child? We have three kids in ASA and that was true for our first in K - minimal previous experience and randomly placed with other kids from the same school. 2nd and 3rd kids were way more proficient in K (played with older siblings; mini academy for 2 years) and were pulled onto teams by coaches we know. Much stronger teams.
Anonymous wrote:I don't actually know any teams who knew each other before they were formed by ASA in kindergarten. ASA just groups kids together by school, and parents volunteer to coach. Out of our school's 6 teams, 1 girls team is very good, 1 girls team is pretty good and the 3rd girls team rarely wins. 1 boys team is very good, 1 boys team is decent and 1 boys team never wins. (Oddly, the same coach coaches the very good girls' team and the not-good boys' team.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been said already. Parents in that club seek out peers and build teams prior to U6. Simple to do. They get the kids together on their own with siblings and friends, and then put the strong kindergartener?s together. They play the summer before Fall U6. Some clubs are all about breaking up teams and parity, but not your club. Very easy to go into U6 and beat everyone. The wins mean nothing. Again, this issue is dumb to go overboard on.
Why do you need to be a bitch to answer the question? I didn't even know there's U4 soccer or that coaches could choose players.
Anonymous wrote:This has been said already. Parents in that club seek out peers and build teams prior to U6. Simple to do. They get the kids together on their own with siblings and friends, and then put the strong kindergartener?s together. They play the summer before Fall U6. Some clubs are all about breaking up teams and parity, but not your club. Very easy to go into U6 and beat everyone. The wins mean nothing. Again, this issue is dumb to go overboard on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This. 100 times.
At ANY age, the kids with the most skill are going to be the ones who play a lot on their own. At U6, a coach who sees a team once a week isn't going to conjure up some magical improvement. Give the best coach in the world a team full of kids who don't touch a soccer ball outside the weekly practice, and that coach isn't going to make much difference.
And at U6 especially, the early-blooming athletes are going to dominate. A kid who has lovely skill but isn't as fast as his peers (or doesn't have the leg strength to simply boot the ball across the field on the fly into the Pugg goal) isn't going to have much time and space to show those skills.
Then how does one club end up with more of such kids on a team than the others, year after year, when teams draw from schools with similar demographics?
Anonymous wrote:
This. 100 times.
At ANY age, the kids with the most skill are going to be the ones who play a lot on their own. At U6, a coach who sees a team once a week isn't going to conjure up some magical improvement. Give the best coach in the world a team full of kids who don't touch a soccer ball outside the weekly practice, and that coach isn't going to make much difference.
And at U6 especially, the early-blooming athletes are going to dominate. A kid who has lovely skill but isn't as fast as his peers (or doesn't have the leg strength to simply boot the ball across the field on the fly into the Pugg goal) isn't going to have much time and space to show those skills.
Anonymous wrote:... so I am not a D1 former player, but I played HS and have coached U4 -U8 for several years. Coaching is not your answer. It is parents ahead of the curve who seek out friends and put together strong teams. Dhluh!
We have a 4 year old in our U5 Saturday session who can cruyff, stepover, scissor, and roulette, not to mention an outside cut beckenbauer or two. Yippee. What can your kindergartener do? Why can't your kid neat the team of kids who can do this? Cause her mom / dad and siblings do this crap with her, and they play together with other youngsters of soccer siblings and practice. It is not hard to dominate K soccer. What a stupid question. Totally dumb thread.
Anonymous wrote:OMG this is the dumbest soccer thread in some time. Please stop!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG this is the dumbest soccer thread in some time. Please stop!
+100. Hoping this thread dies.
why is it dumb and needs to die?
Because they are 6 years old that's why.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG this is the dumbest soccer thread in some time. Please stop!
+100. Hoping this thread dies.
why is it dumb and needs to die?