Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington Latin isn't meant to be Boston Latin.
WL admits via an open lottery not competitive admissions.
Please just move to Boston already.
I really don't understand the attitude of Latin parents. When you bring up a totally reasonable point of people shut it down immediately. Unless you fall all over self praising the school, you're in the wrong. It is not an academically rigorous school. I wish it was.
Ironically, the person complaining about lack of rigor doesn't appear to know that it should be "I wish it were,"not "I wish it was."![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington Latin isn't meant to be Boston Latin.
WL admits via an open lottery not competitive admissions.
Please just move to Boston already.
I really don't understand the attitude of Latin parents. When you bring up a totally reasonable point of people shut it down immediately. Unless you fall all over self praising the school, you're in the wrong. It is not an academically rigorous school. I wish it was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington Latin isn't meant to be Boston Latin.
WL admits via an open lottery not competitive admissions.
Please just move to Boston already.
I really don't understand the attitude of Latin parents. When you bring up a totally reasonable point of people shut it down immediately. Unless you fall all over self praising the school, you're in the wrong. It is not an academically rigorous school. I wish it was.
I'm the PPP. It isn't the most rigorous school. But that isn't its mission. Its name is similar to Boston Latin because that's what the whack job who founded it chose. He was basically run out of town on a rail, and we have the school that Martha Cutts built.
If WL claimed to be the most rigorous school in the city, then your criticism would be fair. But it doesn't. So please stop measuring them against something aren't trying to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington Latin isn't meant to be Boston Latin.
WL admits via an open lottery not competitive admissions.
Please just move to Boston already.
I really don't understand the attitude of Latin parents. When you bring up a totally reasonable point of people shut it down immediately. Unless you fall all over self praising the school, you're in the wrong. It is not an academically rigorous school. I wish it was.
Anonymous wrote:Washington Latin isn't meant to be Boston Latin.
WL admits via an open lottery not competitive admissions.
Please just move to Boston already.
Anonymous wrote:We just declined our 5th grade spot to stay at a Deal feeder.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pur child graduated from Lain. They do not sell spots. All this thread communicates is that the model/vision/curriculum is unique and desirable and its time for a second campus. The charter board takes proposals every year. Its time for a second Latin.
The Latin Board has committed to starting one - within next 4 years.
Are they going to make one of them academically rigorous?
Here we go again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pur child graduated from Lain. They do not sell spots. All this thread communicates is that the model/vision/curriculum is unique and desirable and its time for a second campus. The charter board takes proposals every year. Its time for a second Latin.
The Latin Board has committed to starting one - within next 4 years.
Are they going to make one of them academically rigorous?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pur child graduated from Lain. They do not sell spots. All this thread communicates is that the model/vision/curriculum is unique and desirable and its time for a second campus. The charter board takes proposals every year. Its time for a second Latin.
The Latin Board has committed to starting one - within next 4 years.