Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do you only have high school age kids now, or are you using the high school clusters as a proxy for all the middle and elementary schools in those clusters as well?
My kids are in K, will be in 1st grade in the fall, we are just trying to decide the cluster.
I would steer clear of Churchill-full of snotty entitled kids and the parents are the worst. Whitman is far better-even though wealthy, they seem more down to earth.
Kinda agree in the fact that I know lots of Whitman families and none are snotty. But the 2 families I know from Churchill (both minorities) are also lovely. Also interact with dozens of Wootton families through work, spouse work and sports and most, but not all, are snotty. As an example, An older sibling of a family on sports team (from QO) was going to UMBC next fall and the Wootton parents acted like she was just diagnosed with cancer. It was bizarre.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do you only have high school age kids now, or are you using the high school clusters as a proxy for all the middle and elementary schools in those clusters as well?
My kids are in K, will be in 1st grade in the fall, we are just trying to decide the cluster.
I would steer clear of Churchill-full of snotty entitled kids and the parents are the worst. Whitman is far better-even though wealthy, they seem more down to earth.
Kinda agree in the fact that I know lots of Whitman families and none are snotty. But the 2 families I know from Churchill (both minorities) are also lovely. Also interact with dozens of Wootton families through work, spouse work and sports and most, but not all, are snotty. As an example, An older sibling of a family on sports team (from QO) was going to UMBC next fall and the Wootton parents acted like she was just diagnosed with cancer. It was bizarre.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do you only have high school age kids now, or are you using the high school clusters as a proxy for all the middle and elementary schools in those clusters as well?
My kids are in K, will be in 1st grade in the fall, we are just trying to decide the cluster.
I would steer clear of Churchill-full of snotty entitled kids and the parents are the worst. Whitman is far better-even though wealthy, they seem more down to earth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do you only have high school age kids now, or are you using the high school clusters as a proxy for all the middle and elementary schools in those clusters as well?
My kids are in K, will be in 1st grade in the fall, we are just trying to decide the cluster.
I think you have to get a lot more granular than just high school. Look at the long thread on Ashburton Elementary, which is horribly overcrowded, that's on the front page of this forum right now. That's in the WJ cluster, as is Luxmanor, which is a very small school (like half the size maybe?) compared to Ashburton. You've also got Farmland, Garrett Park, Kensington-Parkwood, Wyngate -- all different neighborhoods and all different schools. I'd focus a lot more on the near-term, since your kids will be in elementary school for six years, than the long-term, since they won't be entering 9th grade for nine years. You have to look at the whole package, not just the high school cluster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do you only have high school age kids now, or are you using the high school clusters as a proxy for all the middle and elementary schools in those clusters as well?
My kids are in K, will be in 1st grade in the fall, we are just trying to decide the cluster.