Anonymous wrote:
Instead of living in the past, look at the future. My white son has had far more injustices and loses than yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
According to the most recent CDS-
Williams: 49% domestic, white only (white in later % refers to this)
Davidson: 68% white
Washington and Lee: 84% white
Colorado College: 63% white
Bowdoin: 63% white
Middlebury: 63% white
Carleton: 60% white
Wesleyan: 55% white
Yale: 45% white
Dartmouth: 50% white
Princeton: 44% white
Swarthmore/Amherst: 43% white
Brown: 43% white
Pomona: 36% white
Pomona is the outlier, but otherwise, it looks like roughly speaking, the better the school, the lower the percentage of white students.
Anonymous wrote:
According to the most recent CDS-
Williams: 49% domestic, white only (white in later % refers to this)
Davidson: 68% white
Washington and Lee: 84% white
Colorado College: 63% white
Bowdoin: 63% white
Middlebury: 63% white
Carleton: 60% white
Wesleyan: 55% white
Yale: 45% white
Dartmouth: 50% white
Princeton: 44% white
Swarthmore/Amherst: 43% white
Brown: 43% white
Pomona: 36% white
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did you know that in the younger generation, whites are about 30%, maybe even less. So, actually, those numbers reflect the CA demographic. CA does not represent the whole of the US. Please educate yourself:
http://www.kidsdata.org/export/pdf?cat=7
Yes! I was going to say the same thing. California schools are very diverse! sorry if this bothers you. Don't go there.
-CA resident.
Pomona takes the lowest percentage of in-state students of any California college or university. When less than a quarter of students are from California, one can't just look to the California demographics to see what is representative.
give it up OP. 55% of kids born in the US in 2000 were white. Add in white international students and the demographics of California (for the still significant % of California admits) and the numbers are reasonable. Plus, you have no idea what the actual applicant pool looks like - perhaps it is more heavily nonwhite than the overall nation. You don't have automatic privilege anymore, sorry not sorry.
Show me any elite school that has 56.7% domestic students of color, and I'll believe you.
According to the most recent CDS-
Williams: 49% domestic, white only (white in later % refers to this)
Davidson: 68% white
Washington and Lee: 84% white
Colorado College: 63% white
Bowdoin: 63% white
Middlebury: 63% white
Carleton: 60% white
Wesleyan: 55% white
Yale: 45% white
Dartmouth: 50% white
Princeton: 44% white
Swarthmore/Amherst: 43% white
Brown: 43% white
Pomona: 36% white
See the exception? Pomona is not getting that different of an applicant pool from all of those top colleges and universities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did you know that in the younger generation, whites are about 30%, maybe even less. So, actually, those numbers reflect the CA demographic. CA does not represent the whole of the US. Please educate yourself:
http://www.kidsdata.org/export/pdf?cat=7
Yes! I was going to say the same thing. California schools are very diverse! sorry if this bothers you. Don't go there.
-CA resident.
Pomona takes the lowest percentage of in-state students of any California college or university. When less than a quarter of students are from California, one can't just look to the California demographics to see what is representative.
give it up OP. 55% of kids born in the US in 2000 were white. Add in white international students and the demographics of California (for the still significant % of California admits) and the numbers are reasonable. Plus, you have no idea what the actual applicant pool looks like - perhaps it is more heavily nonwhite than the overall nation. You don't have automatic privilege anymore, sorry not sorry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Instead of living in the past, look at the future. My white son has had far more injustices and loses than yours.
And this is what comes down to in one sentence.
People like OP are really upset about any loss of privilege, especially if it means colleges are admitting better qualified minorities. How will her son get through life if he has to compete on a slightly more even playing field?
How are you defining even. If all grades, activities and extras are truly equal, then yes, that is equal but if one is slightly higher and someone from a different race gets selected based off race, no it is not an even playing field. I was told for one job I got they wanted to hire a minority and there was only a slim chance I'd get an offer. It surprised me given it was a local county. They ended up hiring me but every time there was a job opening they recruited for minorities only. It didn't go to the best qualified and it sucked for some of us (regardless of race) as we had to pick up their slack. Sadly, they were the ones who got promoted due to race and many of us left leaving behind a huge mess (office got shut down).
Totally insane. ^^+10000
For every one (likely false) story of yours, I have a hundred that work in the other direction. You are insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Instead of living in the past, look at the future. My white son has had far more injustices and loses than yours.
And this is what comes down to in one sentence.
People like OP are really upset about any loss of privilege, especially if it means colleges are admitting better qualified minorities. How will her son get through life if he has to compete on a slightly more even playing field?
How are you defining even. If all grades, activities and extras are truly equal, then yes, that is equal but if one is slightly higher and someone from a different race gets selected based off race, no it is not an even playing field. I was told for one job I got they wanted to hire a minority and there was only a slim chance I'd get an offer. It surprised me given it was a local county. They ended up hiring me but every time there was a job opening they recruited for minorities only. It didn't go to the best qualified and it sucked for some of us (regardless of race) as we had to pick up their slack. Sadly, they were the ones who got promoted due to race and many of us left leaving behind a huge mess (office got shut down).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Instead of living in the past, look at the future. My white son has had far more injustices and loses than yours.
And this is what comes down to in one sentence.
People like OP are really upset about any loss of privilege, especially if it means colleges are admitting better qualified minorities. How will her son get through life if he has to compete on a slightly more even playing field?
How are you defining even. If all grades, activities and extras are truly equal, then yes, that is equal but if one is slightly higher and someone from a different race gets selected based off race, no it is not an even playing field. I was told for one job I got they wanted to hire a minority and there was only a slim chance I'd get an offer. It surprised me given it was a local county. They ended up hiring me but every time there was a job opening they recruited for minorities only. It didn't go to the best qualified and it sucked for some of us (regardless of race) as we had to pick up their slack. Sadly, they were the ones who got promoted due to race and many of us left leaving behind a huge mess (office got shut down).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Instead of living in the past, look at the future. My white son has had far more injustices and loses than yours.
And this is what comes down to in one sentence.
People like OP are really upset about any loss of privilege, especially if it means colleges are admitting better qualified minorities. How will her son get through life if he has to compete on a slightly more even playing field?
Anonymous wrote:
Instead of living in the past, look at the future. My white son has had far more injustices and loses than yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did you know that in the younger generation, whites are about 30%, maybe even less. So, actually, those numbers reflect the CA demographic. CA does not represent the whole of the US. Please educate yourself:
http://www.kidsdata.org/export/pdf?cat=7
Yes! I was going to say the same thing. California schools are very diverse! sorry if this bothers you. Don't go there.
-CA resident.
Pomona takes the lowest percentage of in-state students of any California college or university. When less than a quarter of students are from California, one can't just look to the California demographics to see what is representative.
give it up OP. 55% of kids born in the US in 2000 were white. Add in white international students and the demographics of California (for the still significant % of California admits) and the numbers are reasonable. Plus, you have no idea what the actual applicant pool looks like - perhaps it is more heavily nonwhite than the overall nation. You don't have automatic privilege anymore, sorry not sorry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did you know that in the younger generation, whites are about 30%, maybe even less. So, actually, those numbers reflect the CA demographic. CA does not represent the whole of the US. Please educate yourself:
http://www.kidsdata.org/export/pdf?cat=7
Yes! I was going to say the same thing. California schools are very diverse! sorry if this bothers you. Don't go there.
-CA resident.
Pomona takes the lowest percentage of in-state students of any California college or university. When less than a quarter of students are from California, one can't just look to the California demographics to see what is representative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did you know that in the younger generation, whites are about 30%, maybe even less. So, actually, those numbers reflect the CA demographic. CA does not represent the whole of the US. Please educate yourself:
http://www.kidsdata.org/export/pdf?cat=7
Yes! I was going to say the same thing. California schools are very diverse! sorry if this bothers you. Don't go there.
-CA resident.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did you know that in the younger generation, whites are about 30%, maybe even less. So, actually, those numbers reflect the CA demographic. CA does not represent the whole of the US. Please educate yourself:
http://www.kidsdata.org/export/pdf?cat=7
Yes! I was going to say the same thing. California schools are very diverse! sorry if this bothers you. Don't go there.
-CA resident.