Anonymous wrote:3 for daytime.
Anonymous wrote:I think Americans are generally the last in the world to potty train LOL All the kids I knew overseas were trained by 1.5 like clockwork. The fact that we waited till 2.5 horrified everybody.
Methinks by 3 it's high time. Our PK3 requires children to be fully trained.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS is pushing 3.5 and still not potty trained. He is the only one in his preschool class still in diapers.
Yes, it is a parental failing and nothing more. We really screwed up on this in not training him earlier. Now that he is 3 years and 4 months, he is simply defiant and has no problem walking around in wet pants.
Do you actually put him in DIAPERS and not pull ups? I'm so confused about people using those terms interchangeably here.
Honestly they serve the same purpose. If they crap in either one someone else has to change them. I don't understand why you think they are so fundamentally different.
That being said, my son was like the PP's above. At 3.5 I did a three day potty training camp. It worked like a charm. He just wasn't a kid who could sit on the potty for 10 minutes every day and figure out that's what he needed to do. But in 3 days he was fully potty trained.
Because I taught my child that pull ups were like undies, so they were for accidents and naps/nighttime only. I guess other people use them differently and I didn't realize it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pull ups are marketed to be like safety underwear--hence the "pull up/down" action. Kid is ready to use the toilet, but isn't there yet, so you still have a backup in case they pee/poop in their pants. I would not equate that as a diaper, which is for the distinct purpose of peeing/pooping in.
They're MARKETED that way, and some people successfully use them as such. But they are effectively diapers, and as noted above, many people use them essentially as diapers and only use them at all because 1) their child has outgrown "regular" disposable diapers, 2) their daycare requires them over a certain age to encourage PT, and/or 3) to "start the process" (ineffectively at least 50% of the time IMO)-- but not actually for use only in an emergency or in case of rare miss. A good friend had an almost-2 who requested to use the potty at least 75% of the time, at least for pee, and was in pull -ups... and by 2.5, she has regressed, because she felt it easier to go in a fully absorbent diaper that simply pulls up. I had figured my friend would have put her in underwear to complete the process, but she never figured on actually PT until closer to three, so... The point being, she definitely wasn't using pull-ups as emergency accident-protection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS is pushing 3.5 and still not potty trained. He is the only one in his preschool class still in diapers.
Yes, it is a parental failing and nothing more. We really screwed up on this in not training him earlier. Now that he is 3 years and 4 months, he is simply defiant and has no problem walking around in wet pants.
Do you actually put him in DIAPERS and not pull ups? I'm so confused about people using those terms interchangeably here.
Honestly they serve the same purpose. If they crap in either one someone else has to change them. I don't understand why you think they are so fundamentally different.
That being said, my son was like the PP's above. At 3.5 I did a three day potty training camp. It worked like a charm. He just wasn't a kid who could sit on the potty for 10 minutes every day and figure out that's what he needed to do. But in 3 days he was fully potty trained.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 for daytime.
Don't be ridiculous. It is not unacceptable for a three year old to be wearing diapers.
And before you say it, my kid trained at two, but I remember plenty of three year olds, especially boys, who wore diapers.
Diapers yes, pull ups no.
Well if you're using the pull up as a diaper there is no difference, is it? ,
Then you're using pull ups wrong. They're supposed to be used like underwear.
Anonymous wrote:Pull ups are marketed to be like safety underwear--hence the "pull up/down" action. Kid is ready to use the toilet, but isn't there yet, so you still have a backup in case they pee/poop in their pants. I would not equate that as a diaper, which is for the distinct purpose of peeing/pooping in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS is pushing 3.5 and still not potty trained. He is the only one in his preschool class still in diapers.
Yes, it is a parental failing and nothing more. We really screwed up on this in not training him earlier. Now that he is 3 years and 4 months, he is simply defiant and has no problem walking around in wet pants.
Do you actually put him in DIAPERS and not pull ups? I'm so confused about people using those terms interchangeably here.
Anonymous wrote:DS is pushing 3.5 and still not potty trained. He is the only one in his preschool class still in diapers.
Yes, it is a parental failing and nothing more. We really screwed up on this in not training him earlier. Now that he is 3 years and 4 months, he is simply defiant and has no problem walking around in wet pants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 for daytime.
Don't be ridiculous. It is not unacceptable for a three year old to be wearing diapers.
And before you say it, my kid trained at two, but I remember plenty of three year olds, especially boys, who wore diapers.
Diapers yes, pull ups no.
Well if you're using the pull up as a diaper there is no difference, is it? ,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 for daytime.
Don't be ridiculous. It is not unacceptable for a three year old to be wearing diapers.
And before you say it, my kid trained at two, but I remember plenty of three year olds, especially boys, who wore diapers.
Diapers yes, pull ups no.
If a kid is in pull-ups, he is still in diapers, duh.